Alessandroni Nicolás, Malafouris Lambros, Gallagher Shaun
Concordia Infant Research Laboratory, Concordia University, Montréal, Canada.
Hertford College/Institute of Archaeology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Eur J Psychol. 2024 May 29;20(2):84-103. doi: 10.5964/ejop.13227. eCollection 2024 May.
Although post-cognitivist approaches have shaken the status quo by emphasising the dynamic interactions among the brain, the body, and the environment in cognition, mainstream psychological theories continue to view concepts as primarily representational or skull-bound mental phenomena. As a result, the dynamics of action and the possible impact of material culture on conceptual thinking are poorly understood. In this paper, we explore the process and meaning of conceptual thinking from a material engagement perspective. We argue that conceptual thinking is not a matter of forming representations in the head but something we do-a way of engaging with materiality. Conceptual thinking is conceptual thinging, namely a kind of unmediated practical knowledge that individuals put into play when they engage, in a general way, with and through the world. In this sense, we propose that conceptual thinking is instantiated in the dynamic coordination of bodily practices and artefacts in sociomaterial activities. To elucidate this perspective, we introduce seven principles defining conceptual thinking within an ecological-enactive framework of cognition.
尽管后认知主义方法通过强调大脑、身体和环境在认知中的动态交互动摇了现状,但主流心理学理论仍然主要将概念视为表征性的或局限于头脑中的心理现象。因此,人们对行动的动态过程以及物质文化对概念思维可能产生的影响了解甚少。在本文中,我们从物质参与的角度探讨概念思维的过程和意义。我们认为,概念思维不是在头脑中形成表征的问题,而是我们所做的事情——一种与物质性打交道的方式。概念思维就是概念实践,即一种个体在以一般方式与世界互动并通过世界进行互动时所运用的直接实践知识。从这个意义上说,我们认为概念思维体现在社会物质活动中身体实践与人工制品的动态协调之中。为了阐明这一观点,我们引入了七条原则,在认知的生态-生成框架内定义概念思维。