Landry Shane, Anderson Clare, Conduit Russell
School of Psychological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing & Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
School of Health Sciences, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2016 Jan;127:56-63. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2015.11.009. Epub 2015 Dec 2.
While intervening sleep promotes the consolidation of memory, it is well established that cognitive interference from competing stimuli can impede memory retention. The current study examined changes in motor skill learning across periods of wakefulness with and without competing stimuli, and periods of sleep with and without disruption from external stimuli. A napping study design was adopted where participants (N=44) either had (1) a 30min nap composed of Non-Rapid Eye Movement (NREM) sleep, (2) 30min NREM nap fragmented by audio tone induced arousals, (3) 45min of quiet wakefulness, or (4) 45min of active wakefulness. Measures of subjective sleepiness (KSS), alertness (PVT) and motor skill learning (Sequential Finger Tapping Task, SFTT) were completed in the morning and evening to assess performance pre- and post-nap or wakefulness. Following a practice session, change in motor skill performance was measured over a 10min post training rest interval, as well as following a 7h morning to evening interval comprising one of the four study conditions. A significant offline enhancement in motor task performance (13-23%) was observed following 10min of rest in all conditions. Following the long delay with the intervening nap/wake condition, there were no further offline gains or losses in performance in any sleep (uninterrupted/fragmented) or wake (quiet/active) condition. The current findings suggest that after controlling for offline gains in performance that occur after a brief rest and likely to due to the dissipation of fatigue, the subsequent effect of an intervening sleep or wake period on motor skill consolidation is not significant. Consistent with this null result, the impact of disrupting the sleep episode or manipulating activity during intervening wake also appears to be negligible.
虽然干预睡眠有助于记忆巩固,但众所周知,来自竞争性刺激的认知干扰会阻碍记忆保持。本研究考察了在有或无竞争性刺激的清醒时段以及有或无外部刺激干扰的睡眠时段,运动技能学习的变化情况。采用了午睡研究设计,参与者(N = 44)被分为四组:(1)进行30分钟由非快速眼动(NREM)睡眠组成的午睡;(2)30分钟的NREM午睡,期间因音频提示引起觉醒而被打断;(3)45分钟的安静清醒;(4)45分钟的活跃清醒。在上午和晚上完成主观嗜睡程度(KSS)、警觉性(PVT)和运动技能学习(连续手指敲击任务,SFTT)的测量,以评估午睡或清醒前后的表现。在一次练习之后,在训练后的10分钟休息间隔以及包含四种研究条件之一的从上午到晚上的7小时间隔后,测量运动技能表现的变化。在所有条件下,休息10分钟后均观察到运动任务表现有显著的离线增强(13 - 23%)。在经历了午睡/清醒这一中间时段的长时间延迟后,在任何睡眠(未受干扰/受干扰)或清醒(安静/活跃)条件下,表现都没有进一步的离线提高或下降。目前的研究结果表明,在控制了短暂休息后出现的、可能由于疲劳消散而导致的表现离线提高之后,中间的睡眠或清醒时段对运动技能巩固的后续影响并不显著。与这一零结果一致,干扰睡眠时段或在中间清醒期间操纵活动的影响似乎也可以忽略不计。