• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Self-Assessment Organisational Readiness Tool (SORT) for Nursing Research Capacity Development: Results of a UK Delphi Study.用于护理研究能力发展的自我评估组织准备工具(SORT):英国德尔菲研究结果
Int Nurs Rev. 2025 Sep;72(3):e70084. doi: 10.1111/inr.70084.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Accreditation through the eyes of nurse managers: an infinite staircase or a phenomenon that evaporates like water.护士长眼中的认证:是无尽的阶梯还是如流水般消逝的现象。
J Health Organ Manag. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2025-0029.
4
Experiences of registered nurses as managers and leaders in residential aged care facilities: a systematic review.注册护士在养老院的管理和领导经验:系统评价。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2011 Dec;9(4):388-402. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2011.00239.x.
5
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
6
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.如何在英国产科护理中实施数字临床会诊:ARM@DA实证主义综述
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.
7
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
8
Co-creating a strategy for transforming person centred cultures.共同制定转变以人为本文化的策略。
Front Health Serv. 2025 Jun 4;5:1574632. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2025.1574632. eCollection 2025.
9
Interventions to improve safe and effective medicines use by consumers: an overview of systematic reviews.改善消费者安全有效用药的干预措施:系统评价概述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Apr 29;2014(4):CD007768. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007768.pub3.
10
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.

本文引用的文献

1
Use of Delphi in health sciences research: A narrative review.德尔菲法在健康科学研究中的应用:叙述性综述。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Feb 17;102(7):e32829. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000032829.
2
Barriers to Research Utilization in Nursing: A Systematic Review (2002-2021).护理领域研究成果应用的障碍:一项系统综述(2002 - 2021年)
SAGE Open Nurs. 2022 May 15;8:23779608221091073. doi: 10.1177/23779608221091073. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
3
Cultivating Innovative Work Behavior of Nurses Through Diversity Climate: The Mediating Role of Job Crafting.通过多元氛围培养护士的创新工作行为:工作重塑的中介作用。
SAGE Open Nurs. 2022 May 9;8:23779608221095432. doi: 10.1177/23779608221095432. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
4
Engaging with research: practical advice for nurses at every level.参与研究:给各级护士的实用建议。
Nurs Stand. 2022 Mar 2;37(3):30-34. doi: 10.7748/ns.2022.e11738. Epub 2022 Jan 4.
5
Delphi methodology in healthcare research: How to decide its appropriateness.医疗保健研究中的德尔菲法:如何确定其适用性。
World J Methodol. 2021 Jul 20;11(4):116-129. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v11.i4.116.
6
The Importance of Context and Organization Culture in the Understanding of Nurses' Barriers Against Research Utilization: A Systematic Review.理解护士对研究利用的障碍时,背景和组织文化的重要性:系统评价。
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2021 Apr;18(2):111-117. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12488. Epub 2021 Mar 13.
7
Clinical academic research internships: What works for nurses and the wider nursing, midwifery and allied health professional workforce.临床学术研究实习:对护士以及更广泛的护理、助产和联合健康专业人员队伍有效的方法。
J Clin Nurs. 2022 Feb;31(3-4):318-328. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15611. Epub 2021 Jan 16.
8
Engaging nurses in health policy in the era of COVID-19.在 COVID-19 时代让护士参与卫生政策。
Nurs Forum. 2021 Jan;56(1):89-94. doi: 10.1111/nuf.12514. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
9
Building Research Capacity for Impact in Applied Health Services Research Partnerships Comment on "Experience of Health Leadership in Partnering With University-Based Researchers in Canada - A Call to "Re-imagine" Research".在应用健康服务研究伙伴关系中建立有影响力的研究能力评论“在加拿大与大学研究人员合作的健康领导力经验——呼吁“重新构想”研究”。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2021 Feb 1;10(2):93-97. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2020.11.
10
Increasing capacity for nursing research in magnet-designated organizations to promote nursing research.提高磁石认证机构开展护理研究的能力,以促进护理研究。
Appl Nurs Res. 2020 Oct;55:151286. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2020.151286. Epub 2020 May 16.

用于护理研究能力发展的自我评估组织准备工具(SORT):英国德尔菲研究结果

Self-Assessment Organisational Readiness Tool (SORT) for Nursing Research Capacity Development: Results of a UK Delphi Study.

作者信息

Ali Parveen, Mcgarry Julie, Ahmed Talpur Ashfaque, Cooper Joanne, Cooke Joanne

机构信息

School of Allied Health Professions, Nursing and Midwifery, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, UK.

Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals, Doncaster, UK.

出版信息

Int Nurs Rev. 2025 Sep;72(3):e70084. doi: 10.1111/inr.70084.

DOI:10.1111/inr.70084
PMID:40889103
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12401072/
Abstract

AIM

This Delphi study aimed to develop the Self-assessment Organisational Readiness Tool (SORT), a prototype designed to assess healthcare organisations' capacity to support nursing engagement in research activities.

BACKGROUND

Nurses are pivotal to evidence-based healthcare, yet organisational barriers frequently hinder their engagement in research. Existing frameworks often lack the precision needed to evaluate organisational readiness to support nurses in research capacity building, leadership development and digital innovation. This study aims to bridge this gap through the development of the SORT framework.

METHODS

A structured Delphi consensus-building process was conducted over three iterative rounds and supplemented by four expert working group workshops. Participants, identified through purposive sampling, included 43 professionals with expertise in research and development, evidence-based practice and clinical and research leadership. Quantitative data were analysed using consensus thresholds (≥70% agreement), while qualitative feedback informed the iterative refinement of the tool.

FINDINGS

Consensus was achieved on 67 statements across five thematic areas: People-centred research, releasing potential, research systems, careers and digitally enabled research. Key items highlighted the importance of skills development, organisational leadership and collaboration with academia and patient/public involvement. Limited consensus in areas such as monitoring progress and digital research highlights the need for further refinement. SORT demonstrated strong face validity, with plans for reliability testing and factor analysis in future work.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE AND POLICY

SORT is designed to be used by nursing and R&D leaders, healthcare executives, managers and policymakers to evaluate and improve organisational readiness to support research aiming nurses in healthcare settings. It can inform strategic planning, workforce development and performance benchmarking within healthcare institutions. It will also serve as a guide to individual nurse respondents by increasing their awareness of various initiatives in their organisations that they should know about. SORT provides a practical framework for embedding research within healthcare organisations to support nursing practice. It offers organisations a tool to identify strengths and gaps in research capacity, informing workforce development and infrastructure planning. Policymakers can use SORT to benchmark readiness and align strategies with national objectives. While developed in the UK, SORT has the potential to support global efforts to advance nursing research capacity, as this is the first tool developed specially to measure organisational readiness to support nurses for research and has already generated interest in other countries and professions.

CONCLUSION

SORT represents a significant step towards fostering a research culture within healthcare organisations. By aligning with the Chief Nursing Officer strategy in the UK context, it supports evidence-based practice and enhances nursing's contribution to healthcare quality and innovation. Future work will focus on validating SORT's reliability and expanding its applicability across diverse healthcare settings.

摘要

目的

本德尔菲研究旨在开发自我评估组织准备度工具(SORT),这是一个用于评估医疗保健组织支持护士参与研究活动能力的原型工具。

背景

护士对于循证医疗保健至关重要,但组织障碍常常阻碍她们参与研究。现有框架往往缺乏评估组织在支持护士进行研究能力建设、领导力发展和数字创新方面的准备度所需的精确性。本研究旨在通过开发SORT框架来弥合这一差距。

方法

通过三轮迭代进行了结构化的德尔菲共识构建过程,并辅以四次专家工作组研讨会。通过目的抽样确定的参与者包括43名在研发、循证实践以及临床和研究领导方面具有专业知识的专业人员。定量数据使用共识阈值(≥70%的一致性)进行分析,而定性反馈为工具的迭代完善提供了依据。

结果

在五个主题领域的67条陈述上达成了共识:以人为主的研究、释放潜力、研究系统、职业发展和数字化支持的研究。关键项目突出了技能发展、组织领导力以及与学术界合作和患者/公众参与的重要性。在监测进展和数字研究等领域达成的共识有限,这凸显了进一步完善的必要性。SORT具有很强的表面效度,未来工作中计划进行信度测试和因子分析。

对护理实践和政策的启示

SORT旨在供护理和研发领导者、医疗保健高管、管理人员和政策制定者使用,以评估和提高组织在支持医疗保健环境中护士研究方面的准备度。它可为医疗机构内的战略规划、劳动力发展和绩效基准提供信息。它还将通过提高个体护士受访者对其组织中各种应知晓举措的认识,为他们提供指导。SORT为在医疗保健组织中融入研究以支持护理实践提供了一个实用框架。它为组织提供了一个工具,以识别研究能力的优势和差距,为劳动力发展和基础设施规划提供信息。政策制定者可以使用SORT来衡量准备度,并使战略与国家目标保持一致。虽然SORT是在英国开发的,但它有潜力支持全球提升护理研究能力的努力,因为这是首个专门开发用于衡量组织支持护士进行研究的准备度的工具,并且已经在其他国家和专业领域引起了关注。

结论

SORT是在医疗保健组织中培育研究文化的重要一步。通过与英国背景下的首席护理官战略保持一致,它支持循证实践,并增强了护理对医疗保健质量和创新的贡献。未来工作将专注于验证SORT的信度,并扩大其在不同医疗保健环境中的适用性。