Hadley Lauren V, Novembre Giacomo, Keller Peter E, Pickering Martin J
School of Philosophy, Psychology, and Language Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9JZ, United Kingdom, and MARCS Institute for Brain, Behaviour and Development, Western Sydney University, Penrith, New South Wales 2751, Australia
MARCS Institute for Brain, Behaviour and Development, Western Sydney University, Penrith, New South Wales 2751, Australia.
J Neurosci. 2015 Dec 16;35(50):16516-20. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1850-15.2015.
Overlap between sensory and motor representations has been documented for a range of human actions, from grasping (Rizzolatti et al., 1996b) to playing a musical instrument (Novembre and Keller, 2014). Such overlap suggests that individuals use motor simulation to predict the outcome of observed actions (Wolpert, 1997). Here we investigate motor simulation as a basis of human communication. Using a musical turn-taking task, we show that pianists call on motor representations of their partner's part to predict when to come in for their own turn. Pianists played alternating solos with a videoed partner, and double-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation was applied around the turn-switch to temporarily disrupt processing in two cortical regions implicated previously in different forms of motor simulation: (1) the dorsal premotor cortex (dPMC), associated with automatic motor resonance during passive observation of hand actions, especially when the actions are familiar (Lahav et al., 2007); and (2) the supplementary motor area (SMA), involved in active motor imagery, especially when the actions are familiar (Baumann et al., 2007). Stimulation of the right dPMC decreased the temporal accuracy of pianists' (right-hand) entries relative to sham when the partner's (left-hand) part had been rehearsed previously. This effect did not occur for dPMC stimulation without rehearsal or for SMA stimulation. These findings support the role of the dPMC in predicting the time course of observed actions via resonance-based motor simulation during turn-taking. Because turn-taking spans multiple modes of human interaction, we suggest that simulation is a foundational mechanism underlying the temporal dynamics of joint action.
Even during passive observation, seeing or hearing somebody execute an action from within our repertoire activates motor cortices of our brain. But what is the functional relevance of such "motor simulation"? By combining a musical duet task with a real-time repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation protocol, we provide evidence indicating that the dorsal premotor cortex plays a causal role in accurate turn-taking coordination between a pianist and their observed interaction partner. Given that turn-taking behavior is a fundamental feature of human communication, we suggest that simulation is a foundational mechanism underlying the temporal dynamics of communicative joint action.
从抓握(里佐拉蒂等人,1996b)到演奏乐器(诺温布雷和凯勒,2014),一系列人类动作的感觉和运动表征之间的重叠已被记录下来。这种重叠表明个体使用运动模拟来预测观察到的动作的结果(沃尔珀特,1997)。在此,我们将运动模拟作为人类交流的基础进行研究。通过一项音乐轮流演奏任务,我们发现钢琴演奏者会调用其搭档部分的运动表征来预测何时轮到自己演奏。钢琴演奏者与一个录像中的搭档交替进行独奏,并且在轮流转换点周围施加双脉冲经颅磁刺激,以暂时干扰先前涉及不同形式运动模拟的两个皮质区域的处理:(1)背侧运动前区皮质(dPMC),在被动观察手部动作时,尤其是当动作熟悉时,与自动运动共鸣相关(拉哈夫等人,2007);(2)辅助运动区(SMA),参与主动运动想象,尤其是当动作熟悉时(鲍曼等人,2007)。当搭档(左手)部分之前已经排练过时,相对于假刺激,对右侧dPMC的刺激降低了钢琴演奏者(右手)进入的时间准确性。对于未经排练的dPMC刺激或SMA刺激,这种效应并未出现。这些发现支持了dPMC在轮流演奏过程中通过基于共鸣的运动模拟来预测观察到的动作的时间进程方面的作用。由于轮流演奏跨越了多种人类互动模式,我们认为模拟是联合动作时间动态的基础机制。
即使在被动观察期间,看到或听到某人执行我们技能范围内的动作也会激活我们大脑的运动皮质。但是这种“运动模拟”的功能相关性是什么呢?通过将音乐二重奏任务与实时重复经颅磁刺激方案相结合,我们提供的证据表明,背侧运动前区皮质在钢琴演奏者与其观察到的互动搭档之间准确的轮流协调中起着因果作用。鉴于轮流行为是人类交流的一个基本特征,我们认为模拟是交流性联合动作时间动态的基础机制。