• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Electronic cigarettes: A comparison of national regulatory approaches.电子烟:各国监管方法比较
Can J Public Health. 2015 Oct 3;106(6):e450-3. doi: 10.17269/cjph.106.5043.
2
Effects of reduced-risk nicotine-delivery products on smoking prevalence and cigarette sales: an observational study.降低风险尼古丁传递产品对吸烟率和香烟销售的影响:一项观察性研究。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2023 Sep;11(7):1-39. doi: 10.3310/RPDN7327.
3
Prevalence of awareness, ever-use and current use of nicotine vaping products (NVPs) among adult current smokers and ex-smokers in 14 countries with differing regulations on sales and marketing of NVPs: cross-sectional findings from the ITC Project.14 个国家/地区的成年当前吸烟者和戒烟者中对尼古丁电子烟产品(NVPs)的知晓、曾经使用和当前使用情况:对 ITC 项目不同 NVPs 销售和营销法规的横断面调查结果。
Addiction. 2019 Jun;114(6):1060-1073. doi: 10.1111/add.14558. Epub 2019 Feb 20.
4
Reported exposure to E-cigarette advertising and promotion in different regulatory environments: Findings from the International Tobacco Control Four Country (ITC-4C) Survey.不同监管环境下电子烟广告和促销的报告暴露情况:来自国际烟草控制四项国家(ITC-4C)调查的结果。
Prev Med. 2018 Jul;112:130-137. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.04.022. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
5
The importance of product definitions in US e-cigarette laws and regulations.产品定义在美国电子烟法律法规中的重要性。
Tob Control. 2016 Apr;25(e1):e44-51. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051913. Epub 2014 Dec 14.
6
Global approaches to regulating electronic cigarettes.监管电子烟的全球方法。
Tob Control. 2017 Jul;26(4):440-445. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053179. Epub 2016 Nov 30.
7
Public Health Policies on E-Cigarettes.电子烟公共卫生政策。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2019 Aug 28;21(10):111. doi: 10.1007/s11886-019-1204-y.
8
Does the Regulatory Environment for E-Cigarettes Influence the Effectiveness of E-Cigarettes for Smoking Cessation?: Longitudinal Findings From the ITC Four Country Survey.电子烟的监管环境是否会影响电子烟戒烟的效果?国际烟草控制四国调查的纵向研究结果
Nicotine Tob Res. 2017 Nov 1;19(11):1268-1276. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntx056.
9
Adolescent's Health Perceptions of E-Cigarettes: A Systematic Review.青少年对电子烟的健康认知:系统评价。
Am J Prev Med. 2021 May;60(5):716-725. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.12.013. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
10
Impacts of EU Tobacco Products Directive regulations on use of e-cigarettes in adolescents in Great Britain: a natural experiment evaluation.欧盟烟草制品指令法规对英国青少年使用电子烟的影响:一项自然实验评估。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2023 Jun;11(5):1-102. doi: 10.3310/WTMH3198.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of electronic cigarette usage on the onset of respiratory symptoms and COPD among Chinese adults.电子烟使用对中国成年人呼吸道症状和 COPD 发病的影响。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 7;14(1):5598. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-56368-9.
2
User-generated content and influencer marketing involving e-cigarettes on social media: a scoping review and content analysis of YouTube and Instagram.社交媒体上的用户生成内容和电子烟影响者营销:YouTube 和 Instagram 上的范围审查和内容分析。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Mar 20;23(1):530. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15389-1.
3
Illegal Experimental Tobacco Marketplace II: effects of vaping product bans - findings from the 2020 International Tobacco Control Project.非法实验烟草市场 II:电子烟产品禁令的影响 - 2020 年国际烟草控制项目的调查结果。
Tob Control. 2022 Nov;31(Suppl 3):s214-s222. doi: 10.1136/tc-2022-057515.
4
Should electronic cigarette use be covered by clean indoor air laws?电子烟的使用是否应受室内清洁空气法的管制?
Tob Control. 2017 Mar;26(e1):e16-e18. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053074. Epub 2016 Sep 5.

本文引用的文献

1
A baseline understanding of state laws governing e-cigarettes.对管理电子烟的州法律的基本了解。
Tob Control. 2014 Jul;23 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):iii37-40. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051459.
2
Electronic cigarettes and conventional cigarette use among U.S. adolescents: a cross-sectional study.美国青少年使用电子烟和传统香烟情况:一项横断面研究。
JAMA Pediatr. 2014 Jul;168(7):610-7. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.5488.
3
Peering through the mist: systematic review of what the chemistry of contaminants in electronic cigarettes tells us about health risks.透过迷雾审视:电子烟中污染物化学性质对健康风险的系统评价
BMC Public Health. 2014 Jan 9;14:18. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-18.
4
Electronic cigarettes as a harm reduction strategy for tobacco control: a step forward or a repeat of past mistakes?电子烟作为烟草控制的减少伤害策略:是向前迈进还是重蹈覆辙?
J Public Health Policy. 2011 Feb;32(1):16-31. doi: 10.1057/jphp.2010.41. Epub 2010 Dec 9.

电子烟:各国监管方法比较

Electronic cigarettes: A comparison of national regulatory approaches.

作者信息

Rose Adam, Filion Kristian B, Eisenberg Mark J, Franck Caroline

机构信息

Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.

出版信息

Can J Public Health. 2015 Oct 3;106(6):e450-3. doi: 10.17269/cjph.106.5043.

DOI:10.17269/cjph.106.5043
PMID:26680438
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6972484/
Abstract

E-cigarettes have been readily available to global markets since 2004. However, regulations have lagged behind popular use and availability. As policies emerging from national health agencies have an important role to play in shaping consumer health, we examined the existing and upcoming national regulations surrounding e-cigarette availability and use in a convenience sample of English- and French-speaking countries, including Canada, the United States, the United Kingdom, France, Australia and New Zealand. There is substantial international variation in regulatory policies and the extent to which these are enforced. Of the countries considered in this review, the US has regulations that remain the most permissive, whereas those in Canada and New Zealand are the most conservative. However, regulations in Canada, Australia and New Zealand are easily bypassed through Internet imports and lenient enforcement. European health agencies are paving the way for Member States to take appropriate steps to regulate e-cigarettes according to their own jurisdictions. Currently, national regulations of e-cigarettes appear to be ill-defined in terms of shaping the future of e-cigarette availability and use. National regulations should be strengthened to reflect the public health implications of e-cigarettes and to emphasize their difference from consumer products.

摘要

自2004年以来,电子烟在全球市场上已随处可得。然而,监管却滞后于其广泛使用和可得性。由于各国卫生机构出台的政策在塑造消费者健康方面发挥着重要作用,我们在包括加拿大、美国、英国、法国、澳大利亚和新西兰在内的英语和法语国家的便利样本中,研究了围绕电子烟可得性和使用的现有及即将出台的国家法规。监管政策及其执行程度在国际上存在很大差异。在本次审查所涉及的国家中,美国的法规最为宽松,而加拿大和新西兰的法规最为保守。然而,加拿大、澳大利亚和新西兰的法规很容易通过互联网进口和宽松执法而被规避。欧洲卫生机构正在为成员国根据自身管辖权采取适当措施监管电子烟铺平道路。目前,就塑造电子烟可得性和使用的未来而言,国家对电子烟的监管似乎尚不明确。应加强国家法规,以反映电子烟对公众健康的影响,并强调其与消费品的区别。