Reid Rory C
Department of Psychiatry, University of California , Los Angeles, CA, USA and Global Clinical Scholars Research Training Program, Harvard University , Boston, MA, USA.
J Behav Addict. 2015 Dec;4(4):221-5. doi: 10.1556/2006.4.2015.041.
The concept of severity among providers working with hypersexual behavior is frequently used despite a lack of consensus about how severity should be operationalized. The paucity of dialogue about severity for hypersexual behavior is disconcerting given its relevance in determining level of care, risk, allocation of resources, and measuring treatment outcomes in clinical practice and research trials. The aim of the current article is to highlight several considerations for assessing severity based on the proposed DSM-5 criteria for hypersexual disorder.
A review of current conceptualizations for severity among substance-use disorders and gambling disorder in the DSM-5 were considered and challenged as lacking applicability or clinical utility for hypersexual behavior.
The current research in the field of hypersexual behavior is in its infancy. No concrete approach currently exists to assess severity in hypersexual populations. Several factors in operationalizing severity are discussed and alternative approaches to defining severity are offered for readers to consider.
尽管在如何对严重程度进行操作化定义方面缺乏共识,但在处理性行为亢进的医疗人员中,严重程度这一概念仍经常被使用。鉴于性行为亢进严重程度在确定护理级别、风险、资源分配以及衡量临床实践和研究试验中的治疗结果方面具有相关性,然而关于性行为亢进严重程度的讨论却很少,这令人不安。本文的目的是根据拟议的《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版(DSM - 5)中关于性行为亢进障碍的标准,强调评估严重程度时的几个需要考虑的因素。
对DSM - 5中物质使用障碍和赌博障碍严重程度的当前概念进行了回顾,并对其缺乏对性行为亢进行为的适用性或临床实用性提出了质疑。
性行为亢进行为领域的当前研究尚处于起步阶段。目前不存在评估性行为亢进人群严重程度的具体方法。文中讨论了在操作化严重程度时的几个因素,并为读者提供了定义严重程度的替代方法以供考虑。