• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

补充临床癌症登记数据与患者报告的结果:奥地利骨髓瘤登记处常规电子患者报告结果评估的可行性研究。

Complementing clinical cancer registry data with patient reported outcomes: A feasibility study on routine electronic patient-reported outcome assessment for the Austrian Myelome Registry.

机构信息

Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Tirol, Austria.

Psychiatry II, Innsbruck University Hospital, Innsbruck, Tirol, Austria.

出版信息

Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2019 Nov;28(6):e13154. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13154. Epub 2019 Aug 29.

DOI:10.1111/ecc.13154
PMID:31465136
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6900154/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Routinely assessed patient-reported outcomes (PROs), such as quality of life (QOL), are important to supplement clinical cancer data but requires rigorous implementation. This study aims at depicting the implementation procedure and evaluating the feasibility of routine electronic PRO monitoring (ePRO) for collecting data supplementing the Austrian Myeloma Registry (AMR).

METHODS

Integration of ePRO monitoring into clinical routine was planned according to the Replicating Effective Programs framework. QOL data were assessed regularly during treatment and aftercare at the hematooncological outpatient unit at the Medical University of Innsbruck with the EORTC QLQ-C30/ +MY20 and the EQ-5D-5L. Feasibility and usability testing were performed via a multimethod approach.

RESULTS

Within the first year, 94.4% of the MM patients (N = 142, mean age 65.4, SD 11.8, 60% male) provided 748 PRO assessment time points overall. Patients and clinicians were satisfied with ePRO monitoring and indicated no to little disruption in clinical routine. Patient preference on assessment time points and completion frequency became evident.

CONCLUSIONS

Complementing the AMR with ePRO data proved to be feasible. Our findings provide useful insights for healthcare providers considering introducing ePRO monitoring to their units for informing clinical registries as well as individualised feedback to patients alike.

摘要

目的

定期评估患者报告的结果(PROs),如生活质量(QOL),对于补充临床癌症数据非常重要,但需要严格实施。本研究旨在描述实施程序,并评估常规电子 PRO 监测(ePRO)用于收集补充奥地利骨髓瘤登记处(AMR)数据的可行性。

方法

根据复制有效计划框架,计划将 ePRO 监测纳入临床常规。在因斯布鲁克医科大学血液肿瘤科门诊单元治疗和康复期间,使用 EORTC QLQ-C30/ + MY20 和 EQ-5D-5L 定期评估 QOL 数据。通过多方法途径进行可行性和可用性测试。

结果

在第一年,142 名 MM 患者(平均年龄 65.4,标准差 11.8,60%为男性)中的 94.4%总共提供了 748 个 PRO 评估时间点。患者和临床医生对 ePRO 监测感到满意,并表示对临床常规没有或几乎没有干扰。患者对评估时间点和完成频率的偏好变得明显。

结论

用 ePRO 数据补充 AMR 是可行的。我们的研究结果为考虑将 ePRO 监测引入其单位的医疗保健提供者提供了有用的见解,以便为临床登记处以及为患者提供个性化反馈。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4b9/6900154/25aaa27e66f4/ECC-28-na-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4b9/6900154/de73b891a89d/ECC-28-na-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4b9/6900154/698a61ca0f70/ECC-28-na-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4b9/6900154/25aaa27e66f4/ECC-28-na-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4b9/6900154/de73b891a89d/ECC-28-na-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4b9/6900154/698a61ca0f70/ECC-28-na-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4b9/6900154/25aaa27e66f4/ECC-28-na-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Complementing clinical cancer registry data with patient reported outcomes: A feasibility study on routine electronic patient-reported outcome assessment for the Austrian Myelome Registry.补充临床癌症登记数据与患者报告的结果:奥地利骨髓瘤登记处常规电子患者报告结果评估的可行性研究。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2019 Nov;28(6):e13154. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13154. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
2
Evaluation of electronic patient-reported outcome assessment with cancer patients in the hospital and at home.对癌症患者在医院和家中进行电子患者报告结局评估。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2015 Dec 23;15:110. doi: 10.1186/s12911-015-0230-y.
3
Mapping EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-MY20 to EQ-5D in patients with multiple myeloma.多发性骨髓瘤患者中欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织核心生活质量问卷C30版和骨髓瘤模块问卷MY20版与欧洲五维健康量表的映射关系
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014 Mar 11;12:35. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-12-35.
4
Development of a hospital-based patient-reported outcome framework for lung cancer patients: a study protocol.基于医院的肺癌患者报告结局框架的开发:研究方案。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Jan 11;16(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0837-z.
5
Randomized Controlled Trial of Paper-Based at a Hospital versus Continual Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes at Home for Metastatic Cancer Patients: Does Electronic Measurement at Home Detect Patients' Health Status in Greater Detail?转移性癌症患者在医院进行纸质版与在家持续进行电子患者报告结局的随机对照试验:在家进行电子测量能否更详细地检测患者的健康状况?
Med Decis Making. 2022 Jan;42(1):60-67. doi: 10.1177/0272989X211010171. Epub 2021 Apr 24.
6
Recommendations on evidence needed to support measurement equivalence between electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: ISPOR ePRO Good Research Practices Task Force report.关于支持电子和纸质患者报告结局(PRO)测量等效性所需证据的建议:国际药物经济学与结果研究协会(ISPOR)电子PRO良好研究实践工作组报告
Value Health. 2009 Jun;12(4):419-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00470.x. Epub 2008 Nov 11.
7
PROutine: a feasibility study assessing surveillance of electronic patient reported outcomes and adherence via smartphone app in advanced cancer.PROutine:一项评估通过智能手机应用程序对晚期癌症患者的电子患者报告结局及依从性进行监测的可行性研究。
Ann Palliat Med. 2019 Apr;8(2):104-111. doi: 10.21037/apm.2017.07.05. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
8
A prospective observational study to assess clinical decision-making, prognosis, quality of life and satisfaction with care in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: the CLARITY study protocol.一项评估复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者临床决策、预后、生活质量和护理满意度的前瞻性观察性研究:CLARITY 研究方案。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Jun 18;16(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-0953-4.
9
Integrating patient reported outcomes with clinical cancer registry data: a feasibility study of the electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes From Cancer Survivors (ePOCS) system.将患者报告结局与临床癌症登记数据相结合:癌症幸存者电子患者报告结局(ePOCS)系统的可行性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Oct 25;15(10):e230. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2764.
10
Physical activity and health-related quality of life in multiple myeloma survivors: the PROFILES registry.多发性骨髓瘤幸存者的身体活动与健康相关生活质量:PROFILES 登记研究。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2020 Dec;10(4):e35. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2018-001755. Epub 2019 Jun 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of immigration background on feasibility of electronic patient-reported outcomes in advanced urothelial cancer patients.移民背景对晚期尿路上皮癌患者电子患者报告结局可行性的影响。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2024 Dec 18;22(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12955-024-02325-z.
2
Assessing Whole-Person Outcomes During Routine Clinical Care: A Rapid Scoping Review.评估常规临床护理中的全人健康结局:快速范围综述。
Med Care. 2024 Dec 1;62(12 Suppl 1):S34-S42. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000002046. Epub 2024 Nov 11.
3
Adherence to Patient-Reported Symptom Monitoring and Subsequent Clinical Interventions for Patients With Multiple Myeloma in Outpatient Care: Longitudinal Observational Study.

本文引用的文献

1
The use of volunteers to implement electronic patient reported outcomes in lung cancer outpatient clinics.利用志愿者在肺癌门诊实施电子患者报告结局。
Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol. 2018 Jun 5;7:11-16. doi: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2018.05.002. eCollection 2018 Sep.
2
"Am I normal?" The Wishes of Patients With Lymphoma to Compare Their Patient-Reported Outcomes With Those of Their Peers.“我正常吗?”淋巴瘤患者将其自我报告的结果与同龄人进行比较的愿望。
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Aug 15;19(8):e288. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7079.
3
Patient-reported outcomes in hematology: is it time to focus more on them in clinical trials and hematology practice?
门诊多发性骨髓瘤患者报告症状监测及其后续临床干预的依从性:纵向观察研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Aug 22;25:e46017. doi: 10.2196/46017.
4
Response rates in clinical quality registries and databases that collect patient reported outcome measures: a scoping review.临床质量登记处和收集患者报告结局测量数据的数据库中的反应率:范围综述。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2023 Jul 11;21(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12955-023-02155-5.
5
Essential barriers and considerations for the implementation of electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) measures in oncological practice: contextualizing the results of a feasibility study with existing literature.肿瘤学实践中实施电子患者报告结局(ePRO)措施的基本障碍和考虑因素:结合现有文献对一项可行性研究的结果进行背景分析。
Z Gesundh Wiss. 2022 Oct 28:1-18. doi: 10.1007/s10389-022-01767-3.
6
Usability evaluation of the Computer-Based Health Evaluation System (CHES) eDiary for patients with faecal incontinence: a pilot study.基于计算机的健康评估系统 (CHES) 电子日记在粪便失禁患者中的可用性评估:一项试点研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Mar 28;22(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01818-5.
7
Using the Computer-based Health Evaluation System (CHES) to Support Self-management of Symptoms and Functional Health: Evaluation of Hematological Patient Use of a Web-Based Patient Portal.利用基于计算机的健康评估系统(CHES)支持症状和功能健康的自我管理:基于网络的患者门户在血液病患者中的使用评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jun 8;23(6):e26022. doi: 10.2196/26022.
8
The cancer patient's perspective of COVID-19-induced distress-A cross-sectional study and a longitudinal comparison of HRQOL assessed before and during the pandemic.癌症患者对 COVID-19 所致困扰的看法——一项横断面研究和疫情前后 HRQOL 评估的纵向比较。
Cancer Med. 2021 Jun;10(12):3928-3937. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3950. Epub 2021 May 10.
9
A Novel Digital Patient-Reported Outcome Platform (Noona) for Clinical Use in Patients With Cancer: Pilot Study Assessing Suitability.一种用于癌症患者临床使用的新型数字患者报告结局平台(Noona):评估适用性的试点研究
JMIR Form Res. 2021 May 6;5(5):e16156. doi: 10.2196/16156.
10
The GIMEMA-ALLIANCE Digital Health Platform for Patients With Hematologic Malignancies in the COVID-19 Pandemic and Postpandemic Era: Protocol for a Multicenter, Prospective, Observational Study.GIMEMA联盟在COVID-19大流行和大流行后时代为血液系统恶性肿瘤患者提供的数字健康平台:一项多中心、前瞻性、观察性研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Jun 1;10(6):e25271. doi: 10.2196/25271.
血液学中的患者报告结局:在临床试验和血液学实践中是否更应该关注它们?
Blood. 2017 Aug 17;130(7):859-866. doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-03-737403. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
4
Integration of Novel Agents into the Care of Patients with Multiple Myeloma.新型药物在多发性骨髓瘤患者治疗中的整合应用
Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Nov 15;22(22):5443-5452. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-0861. Epub 2016 Nov 14.
5
Progress and Paradigms in Multiple Myeloma.多发性骨髓瘤的进展与范式
Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Nov 15;22(22):5419-5427. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-0625.
6
The use of EORTC measures in daily clinical practice-A synopsis of a newly developed manual.欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)测量方法在日常临床实践中的应用——一本新编写手册的概要
Eur J Cancer. 2016 Nov;68:73-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.08.024. Epub 2016 Oct 6.
7
Thresholds for clinical importance for four key domains of the EORTC QLQ-C30: physical functioning, emotional functioning, fatigue and pain.欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织核心生活质量问卷(EORTC QLQ-C30)四个关键领域的临床重要性阈值:身体功能、情绪功能、疲劳和疼痛。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016 Jun 7;14:87. doi: 10.1186/s12955-016-0489-4.
8
The Electronic Patient Reported Outcome Tool: Testing Usability and Feasibility of a Mobile App and Portal to Support Care for Patients With Complex Chronic Disease and Disability in Primary Care Settings.电子患者报告结局工具:测试移动应用程序和门户的可用性和可行性,以支持初级保健环境中患有复杂慢性病和残疾的患者的护理。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016 Jun 2;4(2):e58. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.5331.
9
Revisiting the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results Cancer Registry and Medicare Health Outcomes Survey (SEER-MHOS) Linked Data Resource for Patient-Reported Outcomes Research in Older Adults with Cancer.重新审视监测、流行病学和最终结果癌症登记处与医疗保险健康结果调查(SEER-MHOS)的关联数据资源,用于老年癌症患者自我报告结局研究。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016 Jan;64(1):186-92. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13888.
10
Symptom Monitoring With Patient-Reported Outcomes During Routine Cancer Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial.常规癌症治疗期间通过患者报告结局进行症状监测:一项随机对照试验。
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Feb 20;34(6):557-65. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.0830. Epub 2015 Dec 7.