Suppr超能文献

前列腺动态对比增强磁共振成像中不同总体平均动脉输入函数的比较:对药代动力学参数及其诊断性能的影响。

Comparison of different population-averaged arterial-input-functions in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the prostate: Effects on pharmacokinetic parameters and their diagnostic performance.

作者信息

Othman Ahmed E, Falkner Florian, Kessler David-Emanuel, Martirosian Petros, Weiss Jakob, Kruck Stephan, Kaufmann Sascha, Grimm Robert, Kramer Ulrich, Nikolaou Konstantin, Notohamiprodjo Mike

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, University Hospital Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, University Hospital Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.

出版信息

Magn Reson Imaging. 2016 May;34(4):496-501. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2015.12.009. Epub 2015 Dec 17.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess the effect of different population-averaged arterial-input-functions (pAIF) on pharmacokinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) and their diagnostic accuracy regarding the detection of potentially malignant prostate lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

66 male patients (age 65.4±10.8y) with suspected prostate cancer underwent multiparametric MRI of the prostate including T2-w, DWI-w and DCE-MRI sequences at a 3T MRI scanner. All detected lesions were categorized based on ACR PI-RADS version 2 and divided into 2 groups (A: PI-RADS ≤3, n=32; B: PI-RADS >3, n=34). In each DCE-MRI dataset, pharmacokinetic parameters (Ktrans, Kep and ve) and goodness of fit (chi(2)) were generated using the Tofts model with 3 different pAIFs (fast, intermediate, slow) as provided by a commercially available postprocessing software. Pharmacokinetic parameters, their diagnostic accuracies and model fits were compared for the 3 pAIFs.

RESULTS

Ktrans, Kep and ve differed significantly among the 3 pAIFs (all p<.001). Ktrans and Kep were significantly higher in group B compared to group A (all p<.001). For chi(2), lowest results (representing highest goodness of fit) were found for intermediate pAIF (chi(2) 0.073). ROC analyses revealed comparable diagnostic accuracies for the different pAIFs, which were high for Ktrans and Kep and low for ve.

CONCLUSION

Choosing various pAIF types causes a high variability in pharmacokinetic parameter estimates. Therefore, it is of great importance to consider this as potential artifact and thus keep AIF type selection constant in DCE-MRI studies.

摘要

目的

评估不同的总体平均动脉输入函数(pAIF)对动态对比增强磁共振成像(DCE-MRI)药代动力学参数的影响及其在检测潜在恶性前列腺病变方面的诊断准确性。

材料与方法

66例疑似前列腺癌的男性患者(年龄65.4±10.8岁)在3T MRI扫描仪上接受了前列腺多参数MRI检查,包括T2加权成像、扩散加权成像和DCE-MRI序列。所有检测到的病变根据ACR PI-RADS第2版进行分类,并分为两组(A组:PI-RADS≤3,n = 32;B组:PI-RADS>3,n = 34)。在每个DCE-MRI数据集中,使用市售后处理软件提供的3种不同的pAIF(快速、中等、慢速),通过Tofts模型生成药代动力学参数(Ktrans、Kep和ve)以及拟合优度(chi(2))。比较3种pAIF的药代动力学参数、诊断准确性和模型拟合情况。

结果

3种pAIF的Ktrans、Kep和ve差异显著(均p<0.001)。B组的Ktrans和Kep显著高于A组(均p<0.001)。对于chi(2),中等pAIF的结果最低(代表最高拟合优度)(chi(2) 0.073)。ROC分析显示不同pAIF的诊断准确性相当,Ktrans和Kep的诊断准确性高,ve的诊断准确性低。

结论

选择不同类型的pAIF会导致药代动力学参数估计值存在很大差异。因此,将其视为潜在伪影并在DCE-MRI研究中保持AIF类型选择恒定非常重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验