Grochowalski Joseph H, Liu Ying, Siedlecki Karen L
a Department of Psychology , Fordham University , Bronx , NY , USA.
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2016 Sep;23(5):513-29. doi: 10.1080/13825585.2015.1127320. Epub 2015 Dec 28.
The purpose of this study was to estimate and examine ways to improve the reliability of change scores on the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale, Cognitive Subtest (ADAS-Cog). The sample, provided by the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, included individuals with Alzheimer's disease (AD) (n = 153) and individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) (n = 352). All participants were administered the ADAS-Cog at baseline and 1 year, and change scores were calculated as the difference in scores over the 1-year period. Three types of change score reliabilities were estimated using multivariate generalizability. Two methods to increase change score reliability were evaluated: reweighting the subtests of the scale and adding more subtests. Reliability of ADAS-Cog change scores over 1 year was low for both the AD sample (ranging from .53 to .64) and the MCI sample (.39 to .61). Reweighting the change scores from the AD sample improved reliability (.68 to .76), but lengthening provided no useful improvement for either sample. The MCI change scores had low reliability, even with reweighting and adding additional subtests. The ADAS-Cog scores had low reliability for measuring change. Researchers using the ADAS-Cog should estimate and report reliability for their use of the change scores. The ADAS-Cog change scores are not recommended for assessment of meaningful clinical change.
本研究的目的是评估和探讨提高阿尔茨海默病评估量表认知子测试(ADAS-Cog)变化分数可靠性的方法。由阿尔茨海默病神经影像倡议组织提供的样本包括阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者(n = 153)和轻度认知障碍(MCI)患者(n = 352)。所有参与者在基线和1年后均接受了ADAS-Cog测试,并将变化分数计算为1年期间分数的差异。使用多变量概化性估计了三种类型的变化分数可靠性。评估了两种提高变化分数可靠性的方法:重新加权量表的子测试和增加更多子测试。AD样本(范围为0.53至0.64)和MCI样本(0.39至0.61)的ADAS-Cog变化分数在1年期间的可靠性均较低。对AD样本的变化分数进行重新加权提高了可靠性(0.68至0.76),但延长测试对两个样本均未带来有效改善。即使进行了重新加权和增加额外子测试,MCI变化分数的可靠性仍然较低。ADAS-Cog分数在测量变化方面的可靠性较低。使用ADAS-Cog的研究人员应估计并报告其使用变化分数的可靠性。不建议使用ADAS-Cog变化分数来评估有意义的临床变化。