• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患有注意力缺陷多动障碍的男孩对服用药物与服用安慰剂时任务表现的评价及归因

Attention-deficit hyperactivity disordered boys' evaluations of and attributions for task performance on medication versus placebo.

作者信息

Milich R, Licht B G, Murphy D A, Pelham W E

出版信息

J Abnorm Psychol. 1989 Aug;98(3):280-4. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.98.3.280.

DOI:10.1037//0021-843x.98.3.280
PMID:2671083
Abstract

The present study examined the effects of stimulant medication on the self-evaluations of and attributions for task performance of 26 attention-deficit hyperactivity disordered boys. Each boy performed a continuous performance task twice, once while on medication and once while on placebo. Immediately following the completion of the task, the boys were asked a series of questions concerning their self-evaluations of, and attributions for, their performance. Two findings of note were obtained. First, medication, compared with placebo, increased the correspondence between the boys' self-evaluations and their performance. Second, the boys did not use medication as a frequent explanation for their performance, as others have predicted. In fact, the boys picked medication as an explanation for their successes significantly less often than either effort or ability.

摘要

本研究考察了刺激性药物对26名患有注意力缺陷多动障碍男孩的任务表现自我评价及归因的影响。每个男孩都完成了两次持续性操作任务,一次在服药时,一次在服用安慰剂时。任务完成后,立即询问男孩们一系列关于他们对自己表现的自我评价及归因的问题。获得了两个值得注意的发现。首先,与安慰剂相比,药物增加了男孩们的自我评价与表现之间的一致性。其次,正如其他人所预测的,男孩们并未频繁地将药物作为他们表现的解释。事实上,与努力或能力相比,男孩们将药物作为成功原因的选择频率要低得多。

相似文献

1
Attention-deficit hyperactivity disordered boys' evaluations of and attributions for task performance on medication versus placebo.患有注意力缺陷多动障碍的男孩对服用药物与服用安慰剂时任务表现的评价及归因
J Abnorm Psychol. 1989 Aug;98(3):280-4. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.98.3.280.
2
Methylphenidate and attributions in boys with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.患有注意力缺陷多动障碍男孩的哌甲酯与归因
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1992 Apr;60(2):282-292. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.60.2.282.
3
Effects of methylphenidate on the persistence of ADHD boys following failure experiences.
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1991 Oct;19(5):519-36. doi: 10.1007/BF00925818.
4
Effects of methylphenidate and expectancy of ADHD children's performance, self-evaluations, persistence, and attributions on a cognitive task.
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 1997 Feb;5(1):3-13. doi: 10.1037/1064-1297.5.1.3.
5
Effects of methylphenidate and expectancy on performance, self-evaluations, persistence, and attributions on a social task in boys with ADHD.哌甲酯及预期对患有注意力缺陷多动障碍男孩在一项社交任务中的表现、自我评价、坚持性和归因的影响。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2001 Nov;9(4):425-37. doi: 10.1037//1064-1297.9.4.425.
6
Effects of methylphenidate and expectancy on children with ADHD: behavior, academic performance, and attributions in a summer treatment program and regular classroom settings.哌甲酯及预期对多动症儿童的影响:在暑期治疗项目和常规课堂环境中的行为、学业表现及归因
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2002 Apr;70(2):320-35.
7
Messages of medication: effects of actual versus informed medication status on hyperactive boys' expectancies and self-evaluations.药物信息:实际用药状态与告知用药状态对多动男孩期望和自我评价的影响。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1991 Aug;59(4):602-606. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.59.4.602.
8
Which boys respond to stimulant medication? A controlled trial of methylphenidate in boys with disruptive behaviour.哪些男孩对兴奋剂药物有反应?一项针对患有破坏性行为的男孩的哌甲酯对照试验。
Psychol Med. 1987 Feb;17(1):121-43. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700013039.
9
Relative benefits of stimulant therapy with OROS methylphenidate versus mixed amphetamine salts extended release in improving the driving performance of adolescent drivers with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.与缓释混合安非他明盐相比,使用盐酸哌甲酯控释片进行兴奋剂治疗对改善患有注意力缺陷多动障碍的青少年驾驶员驾驶性能的相对益处。
Pediatrics. 2006 Sep;118(3):e704-10. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-2947.
10
Zinc sulfate as an adjunct to methylphenidate for the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children: a double blind and randomized trial [ISRCTN64132371].硫酸锌作为哌甲酯的辅助药物用于治疗儿童注意力缺陷多动障碍:一项双盲随机试验[国际标准随机对照试验编号64132371]
BMC Psychiatry. 2004 Apr 8;4:9. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-4-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Methylphenidate for children and adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).哌醋甲酯治疗注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)儿童和青少年。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 27;3(3):CD009885. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009885.pub3.
2
Accuracy of Achenbach Scales in the Screening of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in a Community Mental Health Clinic.阿肯巴克量表在社区心理健康诊所筛查注意缺陷多动障碍中的准确性
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2017 May;56(5):401-409. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2017.02.007. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
3
Methylphenidate for children and adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).
用于治疗儿童和青少年注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的哌甲酯。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Nov 25;2015(11):CD009885. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009885.pub2.
4
Changes in self-perceptions in children with ADHD: a longitudinal study of depressive symptoms and attributional style.ADHD 儿童自我认知的变化:一项关于抑郁症状和归因方式的纵向研究。
Behav Ther. 2011 Jun;42(2):170-82. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2010.05.003. Epub 2010 Dec 10.
5
Life in the last lane.最后一条车道上的生活。
Paediatr Child Health. 2002 Dec;7(10):681-8.
6
Depression and self-esteem in boys with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: associations with comorbid aggression and explanatory attributional mechanisms.注意缺陷多动障碍男孩的抑郁与自尊:与共病攻击行为的关联及解释性归因机制
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2001 Feb;29(1):23-39. doi: 10.1023/a:1005247412221.
7
Effects of stimulant medication treatment on mothers' and children's attributions for the behavior of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.兴奋剂药物治疗对患有注意力缺陷多动障碍儿童行为的母亲及儿童归因的影响。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2000 Aug;28(4):371-82. doi: 10.1023/a:1005121110278.
8
Effects of methylphenidate on the persistence of ADHD boys following failure experiences.
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1991 Oct;19(5):519-36. doi: 10.1007/BF00925818.