Browne Lorin R, Studnek Jonathan R, Shah Manish I, Brousseau David C, Guse Clare E, Lerner E Brooke
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2016;20(1):59-65. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2015.1056897.
Prior studies have identified provider and system characteristics that impede pain management in children, but no studies have investigated the effect of changing these characteristics on prehospital opioid analgesia. Our objectives were to determine: 1) the frequency of opioid analgesia and pain score documentation among prehospital pediatric patients after system wide changes to improve pain treatment, and 2) if older age, longer transport times, the presence of vascular access and pain score documentation were associated with increased prehospital administration of opioid analgesia in children.
This was a retrospective cross-sectional study of pediatric patients aged 3-18 years assessed by a single EMS system between October 1, 2011 and September 30, 2013. Prior to October 2011, the EMS system had implemented 3 changes to improve pain treatment: (1) training on age appropriate pain scales, (2) protocol changes to allow opioid analgesia without contacting medical control, and (3) the introduction of intranasal fentanyl. All patients with working assessments of blunt, penetrating, lacerating, and/or burn trauma were included. We used descriptive statistics to determine the frequency of pain score documentation and opioid analgesia administration and logistic regression to determine the association of age, transport time, and the presence of intravenous access with opioid analgesia administration.
Of the 1,368 eligible children, 336 (25%) had a documented pain score. Eleven percent (130/1204) of children without documented contraindications to opioid administration received opioids. Of the children with no documented pain score and no protocol exclusions, 9% (81/929) received opioid analgesia, whereas 18% (49/275) with a documented pain score ≥4 and no protocol exclusions received opioids. Multivariate analysis revealed that vascular access (OR = 11.89; 95% CI: 7.33-19.29), longer patient transport time (OR = 1.07; 95% CI: 1.04-1.11), age (OR 0.93; 95% CI: 0.88-0.98) and pain score documentation (OR 2.23; 95% CI: 1.40-3.55) were associated with opioid analgesia.
Despite implementation of several best practice recommendations to improve prehospital pain treatment, few children have a documented pain score and even fewer receive opioid analgesia. Children with longer transport times, successful IV placement, and/or documentation of pain score(s) were more likely to receive prehospital analgesia.
先前的研究已确定了阻碍儿童疼痛管理的医护人员及系统特征,但尚无研究调查改变这些特征对院前阿片类药物镇痛的影响。我们的目标是确定:1)在全系统为改善疼痛治疗而做出改变后,院前儿科患者中阿片类药物镇痛及疼痛评分记录的频率;2)年龄较大、转运时间较长、存在血管通路及疼痛评分记录是否与儿童院前阿片类药物镇痛的增加相关。
这是一项对2011年10月1日至2013年9月30日期间由单一急救医疗服务(EMS)系统评估的3至18岁儿科患者进行的回顾性横断面研究。在2011年10月之前,该EMS系统已实施了3项改善疼痛治疗的措施:(1)针对适合不同年龄段的疼痛量表进行培训;(2)修改协议以允许在不联系医疗控制人员的情况下使用阿片类药物镇痛;(3)引入鼻内芬太尼。纳入所有对钝性、穿透性、撕裂伤和/或烧伤创伤进行有效评估的患者。我们使用描述性统计来确定疼痛评分记录及阿片类药物镇痛给药的频率,并使用逻辑回归来确定年龄、转运时间和静脉通路的存在与阿片类药物镇痛给药之间的关联。
在1368名符合条件的儿童中,336名(25%)有记录的疼痛评分。在没有记录到阿片类药物使用禁忌的儿童中,11%(130/1204)接受了阿片类药物治疗。在没有记录疼痛评分且无协议排除情况的儿童中,9%(81/929)接受了阿片类药物镇痛,而在记录疼痛评分≥4且无协议排除情况的儿童中,18%(49/275)接受了阿片类药物治疗。多变量分析显示,血管通路(比值比[OR]=11.89;95%置信区间[CI]:7.33 - 19.29)、较长的患者转运时间(OR = 1.07;95% CI:1.04 - 1.11)、年龄(OR 为0.93;95% CI:0.88 - 0.98)和疼痛评分记录(OR 为2.23;95% CI:1.40 - 3.55)与阿片类药物镇痛相关。
尽管实施了多项改善院前疼痛治疗的最佳实践建议,但很少有儿童有记录的疼痛评分,接受阿片类药物镇痛的儿童更少。转运时间较长、静脉穿刺成功和/或有疼痛评分记录的儿童更有可能接受院前镇痛。