Montgomery Jonathan
University College London, ULC Laws, Bentham House, Endsleigh Gardens, London, WC1H 0EG, UK.
Health Care Anal. 2016 Mar;24(1):3-23. doi: 10.1007/s10728-015-0310-2.
Bioethics can be considered as a topic, an academic discipline (or combination of disciplines), a field of study, an enterprise in persuasion. The historical specificity of the forms bioethics takes is significant, and raises questions about some of these approaches. Bioethics can also be considered as a governance practice, with distinctive institutions and structures. The forms this practice takes are also to a degree country specific, as the paper illustrates by drawing on the author's UK experience. However, the UNESCO Universal Declaration on Bioethics can provide a starting point for comparisons provided that this does not exclude sensitivity to the socio-political context. Bioethics governance practices are explained by various legitimating narratives. These include response to scandal, the need to restrain irresponsible science, the accommodation of pluralist views, and the resistance to the relativist idea that all opinions count equally in bioethics. Each approach raises interesting questions and shows that bioethics should be studied as a governance practice as a complement to other approaches.
生物伦理学可以被视作一个主题、一门学术学科(或多学科的组合)、一个研究领域、一种说服活动。生物伦理学所呈现形式的历史特殊性意义重大,并引发了对其中一些方法的质疑。生物伦理学也可被视为一种治理实践,具有独特的制度和结构。正如本文通过借鉴作者在英国的经历所表明的那样,这种实践所采取的形式在一定程度上也因国家而异。然而,《联合国教科文组织生物伦理普遍宣言》可以为比较提供一个起点,前提是这并不排除对社会政治背景的敏感性。生物伦理学治理实践由各种正当化叙事来解释。这些叙事包括对丑闻的回应、抑制不负责任的科学的必要性、多元观点的调适,以及对相对主义观点(即在生物伦理学中所有观点都具有同等价值)的抵制。每种方法都引发了有趣的问题,并表明生物伦理学应作为一种治理实践来研究,作为对其他方法的补充。