Suppr超能文献

作为治理实践的生物伦理学

Bioethics as a Governance Practice.

作者信息

Montgomery Jonathan

机构信息

University College London, ULC Laws, Bentham House, Endsleigh Gardens, London, WC1H 0EG, UK.

出版信息

Health Care Anal. 2016 Mar;24(1):3-23. doi: 10.1007/s10728-015-0310-2.

Abstract

Bioethics can be considered as a topic, an academic discipline (or combination of disciplines), a field of study, an enterprise in persuasion. The historical specificity of the forms bioethics takes is significant, and raises questions about some of these approaches. Bioethics can also be considered as a governance practice, with distinctive institutions and structures. The forms this practice takes are also to a degree country specific, as the paper illustrates by drawing on the author's UK experience. However, the UNESCO Universal Declaration on Bioethics can provide a starting point for comparisons provided that this does not exclude sensitivity to the socio-political context. Bioethics governance practices are explained by various legitimating narratives. These include response to scandal, the need to restrain irresponsible science, the accommodation of pluralist views, and the resistance to the relativist idea that all opinions count equally in bioethics. Each approach raises interesting questions and shows that bioethics should be studied as a governance practice as a complement to other approaches.

摘要

生物伦理学可以被视作一个主题、一门学术学科(或多学科的组合)、一个研究领域、一种说服活动。生物伦理学所呈现形式的历史特殊性意义重大,并引发了对其中一些方法的质疑。生物伦理学也可被视为一种治理实践,具有独特的制度和结构。正如本文通过借鉴作者在英国的经历所表明的那样,这种实践所采取的形式在一定程度上也因国家而异。然而,《联合国教科文组织生物伦理普遍宣言》可以为比较提供一个起点,前提是这并不排除对社会政治背景的敏感性。生物伦理学治理实践由各种正当化叙事来解释。这些叙事包括对丑闻的回应、抑制不负责任的科学的必要性、多元观点的调适,以及对相对主义观点(即在生物伦理学中所有观点都具有同等价值)的抵制。每种方法都引发了有趣的问题,并表明生物伦理学应作为一种治理实践来研究,作为对其他方法的补充。

相似文献

1
Bioethics as a Governance Practice.作为治理实践的生物伦理学
Health Care Anal. 2016 Mar;24(1):3-23. doi: 10.1007/s10728-015-0310-2.
6
The activities of UNESCO in the area of ethics.联合国教科文组织在伦理领域的活动。
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2006 Dec;16(4):333-51. doi: 10.1353/ken.2006.0024.
9
What's in a name? Bioethics--and human rights--at UNESCO.
Hastings Cent Rep. 2005 Mar-Apr;35(2):8. doi: 10.1353/hcr.2005.0032.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
On the nature and sociology of bioethics.论生命伦理学的本质与社会学。
Health Care Anal. 2013 Mar;21(1):54-69. doi: 10.1007/s10728-012-0234-z.
2
Reflections on the nature of public ethics.
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2013 Jan;22(1):9-21. doi: 10.1017/S0963180112000345.
3
The troubled identity of the bioethicist.生物伦理学家的困境身份。
Health Care Anal. 2013 Mar;21(1):6-19. doi: 10.1007/s10728-012-0229-9.
5
What can history do for bioethics?历史能为生命伦理学做些什么?
Bioethics. 2013 May;27(4):215-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01933.x. Epub 2011 Dec 13.
6
The Nuremberg Code-A critique.《纽伦堡法典》批判
Perspect Clin Res. 2011 Apr;2(2):72-6. doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.80371.
9
Regulation and the social licence for medical research.医学研究的监管与社会许可
Med Health Care Philos. 2008 Dec;11(4):381-91. doi: 10.1007/s11019-008-9152-0. Epub 2008 Jul 17.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验