Padhy Susanta Kumar, Sahoo Swapnajeet, Mahajan Sonali, Sinha Saroj Kumar
Department of Psychiatry, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Department of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2015 Oct-Dec;6(4):568-77. doi: 10.4103/0976-3147.169802.
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) has been recognized as one of the most common and best studied disorders among the group of functional gastrointestinal disorders. It is a functional bowel disorder in which abdominal pain or discomfort is associated with defecation or a change in bowel habit. In the Western world, IBS appears to affect up to 20% of the population at any given time but in Asian countries, the median value of IBS prevalence defined by various criteria ranges between 6.5% and 10.1%, and community prevalence of 4% is found in North India. Those attending gastroenterology clinics represent only the tip of the iceberg. The disorder substantially impairs the quality of life, and the overall health-care costs are high. IBS has therefore gained increased attention from clinicians, researchers, and pharmaceutical industries. It is often frustrating to both patients and physicians as the disease is usually chronic in nature and difficult to treat. However, the understanding of IBS has been changing from time to time and still most of its concepts are unknown. In this review we have discussed, debated, and synthesized the evidence base, focusing on underlying mechanisms in the brain and bowel. We conclude that it is both brain and bowel mechanisms that are responsible. The clinical implication of such mechanisms is discussed.
肠易激综合征(IBS)已被公认为是功能性胃肠疾病中最常见且研究最多的疾病之一。它是一种功能性肠道疾病,其中腹痛或不适与排便或排便习惯改变有关。在西方世界,肠易激综合征在任何特定时间似乎影响高达20%的人口,但在亚洲国家,根据各种标准确定的肠易激综合征患病率中位数在6.5%至10.1%之间,在印度北部社区患病率为4%。那些前往胃肠病诊所就诊的人只是冰山一角。这种疾病严重损害生活质量,总体医疗成本很高。因此,肠易激综合征越来越受到临床医生、研究人员和制药行业的关注。由于这种疾病通常是慢性的且难以治疗,它常常让患者和医生都感到沮丧。然而,对肠易激综合征的理解一直在不断变化,而且其大多数概念仍然未知。在本综述中,我们讨论、辩论并综合了证据基础,重点关注大脑和肠道的潜在机制。我们得出结论,大脑和肠道机制都有责任。讨论了这些机制的临床意义。