Brett S M, Rodricks J V, Chinchilli V M
Environ Corporation, Washington, DC 20007.
Environ Health Perspect. 1989 Jul;82:267-81. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8982267.
Since the 1980 U.S. Supreme Court decision on the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's (OSHA) proposal to lower the occupational benzene standard from 10 ppm to 1 ppm, numerous quantitative assessments of the leukemia risk of benzene exposure have been prepared. The primary difference between these risk assessments has been in the way in which benzene exposure has been estimated and in the models applied to describe the dose-response relationship. The more recent assessments, in attempting to estimate benzene exposures on an individual basis, and in applying models which make maximal use of the available data points, represent a substantial improvement over earlier assessments. In this paper, we will review the available risk assessments and the data upon which they are based and will present our own assessment, which builds on prior efforts. Our reevaluation of the underlying data on the cohort that we judged to be most suitable for quantitative risk analysis suggested that past assessments may have overestimated risk by a factor of 3 to 24. In addition, we will present some recently made available data of relevance to the benzene exposure histories of cohort of concern. These data provide additional suggestion that the total benzene exposure of certain members of this cohort has likely been seriously underestimated, the extent to which remains to be determined. Further analysis of these data and pursuit of additional sources to improve the characterization of the benzene exposure of this cohort appear to be warranted in order to define more precisely the benzene-leukemia dose-response relationship.
自1980年美国最高法院就职业安全与健康管理局(OSHA)将职业苯标准从10 ppm降至1 ppm的提议做出裁决以来,已经开展了大量关于苯暴露白血病风险的定量评估。这些风险评估之间的主要差异在于苯暴露的估算方式以及用于描述剂量反应关系的模型。最近的评估试图基于个体来估算苯暴露,并应用能最大程度利用现有数据点的模型,相较于早期评估有了显著改进。在本文中,我们将回顾现有的风险评估及其所依据的数据,并给出我们自己基于先前研究成果的评估。我们对认为最适合进行定量风险分析的队列的基础数据进行重新评估后发现,过去的评估可能将风险高估了3至24倍。此外,我们将展示一些最近获得的与相关队列苯暴露历史相关的数据。这些数据进一步表明,该队列中某些成员的总苯暴露可能被严重低估,具体低估程度还有待确定。为了更精确地界定苯与白血病的剂量反应关系,似乎有必要对这些数据进行进一步分析,并寻找更多来源以完善该队列苯暴露的特征描述。