Pignaton Wangles, Braz José Reinaldo C, Kusano Priscila S, Módolo Marília P, de Carvalho Lídia R, Braz Mariana G, Braz Leandro G
From the Anesthesia Cardiac Arrest and Mortality Study Commission, Department of Anesthesiology, Botucatu Medical School (WP, JRCB, PSK, MPM, MGB, LGB); and Department of Biostatistics, Institute of Biosciences, UNESP, University Estadual Paulista, Botucatu, Brazil (LRDC).
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Jan;95(2):e2208. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002208.
In 2006, a previous study at our institution reported high perioperative and anesthesia-related mortality rates of 21.97 and 1.12 per 10,000 anesthetics, respectively. Since then, changes in surgical practices may have decreased these rates. However, the actual perioperative and anesthesia-related mortality rates in Brazil remains unknown. The study aimed to reexamine perioperative and anesthesia-related mortality rates in one Brazilian tertiary teaching hospital.In this observational study, deaths occurring in the operation room and postanesthesia care unit between April 2005 and December 2012 were identified from an anesthesia database. The data included patient characteristics, surgical procedures, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status, and medical specialty teams, as well as the types of surgery and anesthesia. All deaths were reviewed and grouped by into 1 of 4 triggering factors groups: totally anesthesia-related, partially anesthesia-related, surgery-related, or disease/condition-related. The mortality rates are expressed per 10,000 anesthetics with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).A total of 55,002 anesthetics and 88 deaths were reviewed, representing an overall mortality rate of 16.0 per 10,000 anesthetics (95% CI: 13.0-19.7). There were no anesthesia-related deaths. The major causes of mortality were patient disease/condition-related (13.8, 95% CI: 10.7-16.9) followed by surgery-related (2.2, 95% CI: 1.0-3.4). The major risks of perioperative mortality were children younger than 1-year-old, older patients, patients with poor ASA physical status (III-V), emergency, cardiac or vascular surgeries, and multiple surgeries performed under the same anesthetic technique (P < 0.0001).There were no anesthesia-related deaths. However, the high mortality rate caused by the poor physical conditions of some patients suggests that primary prevention might be the key to reducing perioperative mortality. These findings demonstrate the need to improve medical perioperative practices for high-risk patients in under-resourced settings.
2006年,我们机构之前的一项研究报告称,围手术期和麻醉相关的死亡率分别高达每10000例麻醉中21.97例和1.12例。自那时以来,手术操作的变化可能降低了这些比率。然而,巴西实际的围手术期和麻醉相关死亡率仍然未知。该研究旨在重新审视巴西一家三级教学医院的围手术期和麻醉相关死亡率。
在这项观察性研究中,从麻醉数据库中确定了2005年4月至2012年12月期间在手术室和麻醉后护理单元发生的死亡病例。数据包括患者特征、手术程序、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)身体状况、医学专科团队,以及手术和麻醉类型。所有死亡病例均经过审查,并分为以下4个触发因素组之一:完全与麻醉相关、部分与麻醉相关、与手术相关或与疾病/病情相关。死亡率以每10000例麻醉表示,并给出95%置信区间(CI)。
共审查了55002例麻醉病例和88例死亡病例,总体死亡率为每10000例麻醉中16.0例(95%CI:13.0 - 19.7)。没有与麻醉相关的死亡病例。主要死亡原因是与患者疾病/病情相关(13.8,95%CI:10.7 - 16.9),其次是与手术相关(2.2,95%CI:1.0 - 3.4)。围手术期死亡的主要风险因素是1岁以下儿童、老年患者、ASA身体状况较差(III - V级)的患者、急诊手术、心脏或血管手术,以及在同一麻醉技术下进行的多次手术(P<0.0001)。
没有与麻醉相关的死亡病例。然而,一些患者身体状况不佳导致的高死亡率表明,一级预防可能是降低围手术期死亡率的关键。这些发现表明,在资源匮乏的环境中,需要改善高危患者的医疗围手术期实践。