Ramos Ruth Alma, de los Reyes Vikki Carr, Sucaldito Ma Nemia, Tayag Enrique
Field Epidemiology Training Program, Epidemiology Bureau, Department of Health, Sta Cruz, Manila, Philippines.; Department of Health, Sta Cruz, Manila, Philippines.
Department of Health, Sta Cruz, Manila, Philippines .
Western Pac Surveill Response J. 2015 Nov 6;6 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):39-43. doi: 10.5365/WPSAR.2015.6.2.HYN_003. eCollection 2015 Oct-Dec.
Typhoon Haiyan caused thousands of deaths and catastrophic destruction, leaving many homeless in Region 8 of the Philippines. A team from the Philippine Field Epidemiology Training Program conducted a rapid health assessment survey of evacuation centres severely affected by Haiyan.
A descriptive study was conducted whereby a convenience sample of evacuation centres were assessed on the number of toilets per evacuee, sanitation, drinking-water, food supply source and medical services.
Of the 20 evacuation centres assessed, none had a designated manager. Most were located in schools (70%) with the estimated number of evacuees ranging from 15 to 5000 per centre. Only four (20%) met the World Health Organization standard for number of toilets per evacuee; none of the large evacuation centres had even half the recommended number of toilets. All of the evacuation centres had available drinking-water. None of the evacuation centres had garbage collection, vector control activities or standby medical teams. Fourteen (70%) evacuation centres had onsite vaccination activities for measles, tetanus and polio virus. Many evacuation centres were overcrowded.
Evacuation centres are needed in almost every disaster. They should be safely located and equipped with the required amenities. In disaster-prone areas such as the Philippines, schools and community centres should not be designated as evacuation centres unless they are equipped with adequate sanitation services.
台风“海燕”造成数千人死亡和灾难性破坏,使菲律宾第8地区许多人无家可归。菲律宾现场流行病学培训项目的一个团队对受“海燕”严重影响的疏散中心进行了快速健康评估调查。
开展了一项描述性研究,通过便利抽样对疏散中心进行评估,内容包括每个撤离者的厕所数量、卫生设施、饮用水、食物供应来源和医疗服务。
在评估的20个疏散中心中,没有一个有指定的管理人员。大多数位于学校(70%),每个中心的撤离者估计人数从15人到5000人不等。只有4个(20%)疏散中心的每个撤离者厕所数量符合世界卫生组织标准;没有一个大型疏散中心的厕所数量达到建议数量的一半。所有疏散中心都有饮用水供应。没有一个疏散中心有垃圾收集、病媒控制活动或待命医疗团队。14个(70%)疏散中心有针对麻疹、破伤风和脊髓灰质炎病毒的现场疫苗接种活动。许多疏散中心过度拥挤。
几乎每次灾难都需要疏散中心。它们应选址安全并配备所需设施。在菲律宾这样的易灾地区,除非学校和社区中心配备了足够的卫生设施,否则不应指定其为疏散中心。