• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

助产士劳动力:美国护理助产士学院2012年及助产士认证委员会2013年核心数据

The Midwifery Workforce: ACNM 2012 and AMCB 2013 Core Data.

作者信息

Fullerton Judith, Sipe Theresa Ann, Hastings-Tolsma Marie, McFarlin Barbara L, Schuiling Kerri, Bright Carrie D, Havens Lori B, Krulewitch Cara J

出版信息

J Midwifery Womens Health. 2015 Nov-Dec;60(6):751-61. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12405.

DOI:10.1111/jmwh.12405
PMID:26769385
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Core data are crucial for detailing an accurate profile of the midwifery workforce in the United States. The American College of Nurse-Midwives (ACNM) and the American Midwifery Certification Board, Inc. (AMCB), at the request and with support from the US Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), are engaged in a collaborative effort to develop a data collection strategy (the Midwifery MasterFile) that will reflect demographic and practice characteristics of certified nurse-midwives (CNMs) and certified midwives (CMs) in the United States.

METHODS

Two independent datasets, one collected by ACNM in 2012 and one by AMCB in 2013, were examined to determine key workforce information. ACNM data were collected from the online Core Data Survey sent to ACNM members. AMCB data were extracted from information submitted online by applicants seeking initial certification in 2013 and applicants seeking to recertify following 5 years of initial certification.

RESULTS

The ACNM 2012 survey was partially or fully completed by 36% (n = 2185) of ACNM members (N = 6072). AMCB respondents included 100% of new certificants (N = 539) and those applying for recertification in 2013 (n = 1323) of the total 11,682 certificants in the AMCB database. These two datasets demonstrate that midwives remain largely white, female, and older in age, with most engaged in clinical midwifery while employed primarily by hospitals and medical centers. Differences were reported between the ACNM membership and AMCB certification datasets in the numbers of midwives holding other certifications, working full-time, attending births, and providing newborn care.

DISCUSSION

The new collaboration among HRSA, ACNM, and AMCB, represented as the Midwifery MasterFile, provides the opportunity to clearly profile CNMs/CMs, distinct from advanced practice registered nurses, in government reports about the health care workforce. This information is central to identifying and marketing the role and contribution of CNMs/CMs in the provision of primary and reproductive health care services.

摘要

引言

核心数据对于详细描绘美国助产士劳动力的准确概况至关重要。应美国卫生资源与服务管理局(HRSA)的要求并在其支持下,美国护士助产士学院(ACNM)和美国助产士认证委员会(AMCB)正在共同努力制定一项数据收集策略(助产士主文件),该策略将反映美国认证护士助产士(CNM)和认证助产士(CM)的人口统计学和执业特征。

方法

对两个独立的数据集进行了审查,以确定关键的劳动力信息,其中一个数据集由ACNM在2012年收集,另一个由AMCB在2013年收集。ACNM的数据是从发送给ACNM成员的在线核心数据调查中收集的。AMCB的数据是从2013年寻求初始认证的申请人以及在初始认证5年后寻求重新认证的申请人在线提交的信息中提取的。

结果

ACNM 2012年的调查有36%(n = 2185)的ACNM成员(N = 6072)部分或全部完成。AMCB的受访者包括100%的新认证者(N = 539)以及AMCB数据库中11,682名认证者中2013年申请重新认证的人员(n = 1323)。这两个数据集表明,助产士在很大程度上仍然以白人、女性和年龄较大者为主,大多数从事临床助产工作,主要受雇于医院和医疗中心。在持有其他认证、全职工作、接生和提供新生儿护理的助产士数量方面,ACNM成员数据集和AMCB认证数据集之间存在差异。

讨论

HRSA、ACNM和AMCB之间新的合作,即助产士主文件,为在政府关于医疗保健劳动力的报告中清晰描绘CNM/CM(有别于高级实践注册护士)提供了机会。这些信息对于识别和宣传CNM/CM在提供初级和生殖保健服务中的作用及贡献至关重要。

相似文献

1
The Midwifery Workforce: ACNM 2012 and AMCB 2013 Core Data.助产士劳动力:美国护理助产士学院2012年及助产士认证委员会2013年核心数据
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2015 Nov-Dec;60(6):751-61. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12405.
2
American Midwifery Certification Board Certification Demographic and Employment Data, 2016 to 2020: The Certified Nurse-Midwife and Certified Midwife Workforce.美国助产学认证委员会认证人口统计和就业数据,2016 年至 2020 年:注册护士助产士和注册助产士劳动力。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2023 Sep-Oct;68(5):563-574. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13511. Epub 2023 Jun 7.
3
Findings from the analysis of the American College of Nurse-Midwives' membership surveys: 2009 to 2011.美国护士助产士学院会员调查分析结果:2009 年至 2011 年。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2013 Jul-Aug;58(4):404-15. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12064. Epub 2013 Jul 23.
4
Findings from the analysis of the American College of Nurse-Midwives' membership surveys: 2000-2003.美国助产士学院成员调查分析结果:2000 - 2003年
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2005 Jan-Feb;50(1):8-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2004.08.025.
5
Findings from the analysis of the American College of Nurse-Midwives' membership surveys: 2006-2008.美国护士助产士学院会员调查分析结果:2006-2008 年。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2010 Jul-Aug;55(4):299-307. doi: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2010.03.011.
6
Findings of the 1990 Annual American College of Nurse-Midwives Membership Survey.1990年美国助产士学院年度会员调查结果。
J Nurse Midwifery. 1992 Jan-Feb;37(1):33-47. doi: 10.1016/0091-2182(92)90020-4.
7
Formulating evidence-based guidelines for certified nurse-midwives and certified midwives attending home births.为认证护士助产士和认证助产士制定家庭分娩护理的循证指南。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2014 Mar-Apr;59(2):153-9. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12142. Epub 2014 Mar 5.
8
Knowledge of US Midwifery Credentials Among Members of the American College of Nurse-Midwives.美国助产士协会会员对美国助产学资质的了解。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2020 Mar;65(2):238-247. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13038. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
9
ACNM's Commentary on the Midwifery Workforce in the US.美国助产士劳动力的 ACNM 述评。
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2024;38(2):113-116. doi: 10.1097/JPN.0000000000000830. Epub 2024 May 13.
10
The Practice of Midwifery in Rural US Hospitals.美国乡村医院的助产实践。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2016 Jul;61(4):411-8. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12474. Epub 2016 Apr 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Examining respect, autonomy, and mistreatment in childbirth in the US: do provider type and place of birth matter?审视美国分娩中的尊重、自主权和虐待问题:提供者类型和分娩地点是否重要?
Reprod Health. 2023 May 1;20(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12978-023-01584-1.
2
Inequities in quality perinatal care in the United States during pregnancy and birth after cesarean.美国剖宫产术后妊娠和分娩期间围产期护理质量的不平等现象。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 22;17(9):e0274790. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274790. eCollection 2022.
3
Burnout of the US midwifery workforce and the role of practice environment.
美国助产士劳动力倦怠及其执业环境的作用。
Health Serv Res. 2022 Apr;57(2):351-363. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13922. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
4
The Impact of Culturally-Centered Care on Peripartum Experiences of Autonomy and Respect in Community Birth Centers: A Comparative Study.以文化为中心的护理对社区分娩中心围产期自主性和尊重体验的影响:一项比较研究。
Matern Child Health J. 2022 Apr;26(4):895-904. doi: 10.1007/s10995-021-03245-w. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
5
Racial and Ethnic Diversity in the Nursing Workforce: A Focus on Maternity Care.护理劳动力中的种族和民族多样性:以产妇护理为重点。
Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2021 Aug;22(3):170-179. doi: 10.1177/15271544211005719. Epub 2021 Mar 27.
6
Nature and scope of certified nurse-midwifery practice: A workforce study.认证护士助产士实践的性质和范围:劳动力研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2018 Nov;27(21-22):4000-4017. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14489. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
7
Differentiating Research, Quality Improvement, and Case Studies to Ethically Incorporate Pregnant Women.区分研究、质量改进和案例研究,以便在伦理上纳入孕妇。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2018 Jan;63(1):104-114. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12673. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
8
Utilizing Datasets to Advance Perinatal Research.利用数据集推进围产期研究。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2017 Sep;62(5):545-561. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12640. Epub 2017 Aug 11.