Riley Mitchell R, Constantinidis Christos
Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy, Wake Forest School of Medicine Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Front Syst Neurosci. 2016 Jan 5;9:181. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2015.00181. eCollection 2015.
The prefrontal cortex is activated during working memory, as evidenced by fMRI results in human studies and neurophysiological recordings in animal models. Persistent activity during the delay period of working memory tasks, after the offset of stimuli that subjects are required to remember, has traditionally been thought of as the neural correlate of working memory. In the last few years several findings have cast doubt on the role of this activity. By some accounts, activity in other brain areas, such as the primary visual and posterior parietal cortex, is a better predictor of information maintained in visual working memory and working memory performance; dynamic patterns of activity may convey information without requiring persistent activity at all; and prefrontal neurons may be ill-suited to represent non-spatial information about the features and identity of remembered stimuli. Alternative interpretations about the role of the prefrontal cortex have thus been suggested, such as that it provides a top-down control of information represented in other brain areas, rather than maintaining a working memory trace itself. Here we review evidence for and against the role of prefrontal persistent activity, with a focus on visual neurophysiology. We show that persistent activity predicts behavioral parameters precisely in working memory tasks. We illustrate that prefrontal cortex represents features of stimuli other than their spatial location, and that this information is largely absent from early cortical areas during working memory. We examine memory models not dependent on persistent activity, and conclude that each of those models could mediate only a limited range of memory-dependent behaviors. We review activity decoded from brain areas other than the prefrontal cortex during working memory and demonstrate that these areas alone cannot mediate working memory maintenance, particularly in the presence of distractors. We finally discuss the discrepancy between BOLD activation and spiking activity findings, and point out that fMRI methods do not currently have the spatial resolution necessary to decode information within the prefrontal cortex, which is likely organized at the micrometer scale. Therefore, we make the case that prefrontal persistent activity is both necessary and sufficient for the maintenance of information in working memory.
在工作记忆过程中,前额叶皮层会被激活,这一点在人类研究的功能磁共振成像(fMRI)结果以及动物模型的神经生理学记录中得到了证实。在工作记忆任务的延迟期,即被试需要记住的刺激消失之后,持续的活动传统上被认为是工作记忆的神经关联。在过去几年里,一些研究结果对这种活动的作用提出了质疑。有人认为,其他脑区的活动,如初级视觉皮层和后顶叶皮层,能更好地预测视觉工作记忆中所保持的信息以及工作记忆表现;动态的活动模式可能根本不需要持续活动就能传递信息;而且前额叶神经元可能并不适合表征关于被记住刺激的特征和身份的非空间信息。因此,有人提出了关于前额叶皮层作用的其他解释,比如它对其他脑区所表征的信息提供自上而下的控制,而不是自身维持工作记忆痕迹。在这里,我们回顾支持和反对前额叶持续活动作用的证据,重点关注视觉神经生理学。我们表明,持续活动能在工作记忆任务中精确预测行为参数。我们举例说明,前额叶皮层表征刺激的特征而非其空间位置,并且在工作记忆过程中早期皮层区域基本不存在这种信息。我们研究不依赖持续活动的记忆模型,并得出结论,这些模型中的每一个只能介导有限范围的记忆依赖行为。我们回顾在工作记忆过程中从前额叶皮层以外的脑区解码的活动,并证明仅这些脑区无法介导工作记忆维持,尤其是在存在干扰物的情况下。我们最后讨论血氧水平依赖(BOLD)激活和放电活动结果之间的差异,并指出功能磁共振成像方法目前没有解码前额叶皮层内信息所需的空间分辨率,前额叶皮层可能是在微米尺度上组织的。因此,我们认为前额叶持续活动对于工作记忆中信息的维持既是必要的也是充分的。