Mukadi Pierre, Lejon Veerle, Barbé Barbara, Gillet Philippe, Nyembo Christophe, Lukuka Albert, Likwela Joris, Lumbala Crispin, Mbaruku Justin, Vander Veken Wim, Mumba Dieudonné, Lutumba Pascal, Muyembe Jean-Jacques, Jacobs Jan
National Institute of Biomedical Research, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
University of Lubumbashi, Lubumbashi, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 20;11(1):e0146450. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146450. eCollection 2016.
The present External Quality Assessment (EQA) assessed microscopy of blood parasites among diagnostic laboratories in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. The EQA addressed 445 participants in 10/11 provinces (October 2013-April 2014). Participants were sent a panel of five slides and asked to return a routinely stained slide which was assessed for quality of preparation and staining. Response rate was 89.9% (400/445). For slide 1 (no parasites), 30.6% participants reported malaria, mostly Plasmodium falciparum. Only 11.0% participants reported slide 2 (Plasmodium malariae) correctly, 71.0% reported "malaria" or "Plasmodium falciparum" (considered acceptable). Slide 3 contained Plasmodium falciparum (109/μl) and Trypanosoma brucei brucei trypomastigotes: they were each reported by 32.5% and 16.5% participants respectively, 6.0% reported both. Slide 4 (Trypanosoma) was recognised by 44.9% participants. Slide 5 (Plasmodium ovale) was correctly reported by 6.2% participants, another 68.8% replied "malaria" or "Plasmodium falciparum" (considered acceptable). Only 13.6% of routine slides returned were correctly prepared and stained. The proportion of correct/acceptable scores for at least 4/5 slides was higher among EQA-experienced participants compared to first time participants (40.9% versus 22.4%, p = 0.001) and higher among those being trained < 2 years ago compared to those who were not (42.9% versus 26.3%, p = 0.01). Among diagnostic laboratories in Democratic Republic of the Congo, performance of blood parasite microscopy including non-falciparum species and Trypanosoma was poor. Recent training and previous EQA participation were associated with a better performance.
本次外部质量评估(EQA)对刚果民主共和国各诊断实验室的血液寄生虫显微镜检查进行了评估。该EQA涉及10/11个省份的445名参与者(2013年10月至2014年4月)。向参与者发送了一组五张载玻片,并要求他们返还一张常规染色的载玻片,对其制备和染色质量进行评估。回复率为89.9%(400/445)。对于第1张载玻片(无寄生虫),30.6%的参与者报告为疟疾,主要是恶性疟原虫。只有11.0%的参与者正确报告了第2张载玻片(间日疟原虫),71.0%的参与者报告为“疟疾”或“恶性疟原虫”(视为可接受)。第3张载玻片含有恶性疟原虫(109/μl)和布氏布氏锥虫锥鞭毛体:分别有32.5%和16.5%的参与者报告了它们,6.0%的参与者同时报告了两者。第4张载玻片(锥虫)被44.9%的参与者识别。第5张载玻片(卵形疟原虫)被6.2%的参与者正确报告,另有68.8%的参与者回复为“疟疾”或“恶性疟原虫”(视为可接受)。返还的常规载玻片中只有13.6%制备和染色正确。与首次参与者相比,有EQA经验的参与者中至少4/5张载玻片获得正确/可接受分数的比例更高(40.9%对22.4%,p = 0.001),与未接受培训的参与者相比,2年前内接受培训的参与者中该比例更高(42.9%对26.3%,p = 0.01)。在刚果民主共和国的诊断实验室中,包括非恶性疟原虫种类和锥虫在内的血液寄生虫显微镜检查表现较差。近期培训和以前参与EQA与更好的表现相关。