Fluegge Keith
Institute of Health and Environmental Research, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
J Sci Food Agric. 2016 Jul;96(9):2939-40. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.7634. Epub 2016 Mar 14.
There exists a wide chasm between public opinion and scientific evidence on the safety of genetically engineered food, herein referred to as GMOs. Plant biotechnologists give credit to a small community of activists negatively influencing individual minds on this issue, but this approach neglects other social contexts in which such cognition operates. The author argues here that current public opinion on GMOs is a manifestation of the constant interaction between environmental, behavioral, and cognitive influences on this issue. In order to sway public opinion and be consistent with social learning theory, biotechnology advocates and plant scientists will need to move beyond their recognized expertise in order to rework the argument for GMOs in the modern-day food supply, one that wholly embraces an individual-level framing of the debate, tantamount to other successful professional trends like patient-centered medicine. © 2016 Society of Chemical Industry.
在公众舆论与关于基因工程食品(以下简称转基因生物)安全性的科学证据之间存在着巨大差距。植物生物技术专家认为一小群激进分子在这个问题上对个人思想产生了负面影响,但这种观点忽视了产生这种认知的其他社会背景。作者在此认为,当前公众对转基因生物的看法是环境、行为和认知因素在这个问题上持续相互作用的表现。为了影响公众舆论并与社会学习理论保持一致,生物技术倡导者和植物科学家将需要超越他们已被认可的专业知识,以便在现代食品供应中重新构建转基因生物的论据,这种论据要完全接受基于个人层面的辩论框架,这类似于以患者为中心的医学等其他成功的专业趋势。© 2016化学工业协会。