Biomedical Imaging Group Rotterdam, Departments of Radiology & Medical Informatics, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Biomedical Imaging Group Rotterdam, Departments of Radiology & Medical Informatics, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Quantitative Imaging Group, Department of Imaging Physics, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.
Med Image Anal. 2016 Apr;29:65-78. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2015.12.004. Epub 2015 Dec 19.
Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (qMRI) is a technique for estimating quantitative tissue properties, such as the T1 and T2 relaxation times, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and various perfusion measures. This estimation is achieved by acquiring multiple images with different acquisition parameters (or at multiple time points after injection of a contrast agent) and by fitting a qMRI signal model to the image intensities. Image registration is often necessary to compensate for misalignments due to subject motion and/or geometric distortions caused by the acquisition. However, large differences in image appearance make accurate image registration challenging. In this work, we propose a groupwise image registration method for compensating misalignment in qMRI. The groupwise formulation of the method eliminates the requirement of choosing a reference image, thus avoiding a registration bias. The method minimizes a cost function that is based on principal component analysis (PCA), exploiting the fact that intensity changes in qMRI can be described by a low-dimensional signal model, but not requiring knowledge on the specific acquisition model. The method was evaluated on 4D CT data of the lungs, and both real and synthetic images of five different qMRI applications: T1 mapping in a porcine heart, combined T1 and T2 mapping in carotid arteries, ADC mapping in the abdomen, diffusion tensor mapping in the brain, and dynamic contrast-enhanced mapping in the abdomen. Each application is based on a different acquisition model. The method is compared to a mutual information-based pairwise registration method and four other state-of-the-art groupwise registration methods. Registration accuracy is evaluated in terms of the precision of the estimated qMRI parameters, overlap of segmented structures, distance between corresponding landmarks, and smoothness of the deformation. In all qMRI applications the proposed method performed better than or equally well as competing methods, while avoiding the need to choose a reference image. It is also shown that the results of the conventional pairwise approach do depend on the choice of this reference image. We therefore conclude that our groupwise registration method with a similarity measure based on PCA is the preferred technique for compensating misalignments in qMRI.
定量磁共振成像(qMRI)是一种用于估计定量组织特性的技术,例如 T1 和 T2 弛豫时间、表观扩散系数(ADC)和各种灌注测量值。这种估计是通过获取具有不同采集参数的多个图像(或在注射对比剂后的多个时间点)并将 qMRI 信号模型拟合到图像强度来实现的。由于受试者运动和/或采集引起的几何变形,图像配准通常是必要的,以补偿配准的不准确性。然而,图像外观的巨大差异使得准确的图像配准具有挑战性。在这项工作中,我们提出了一种用于补偿 qMRI 中配准不准确的分组图像配准方法。该方法的分组公式消除了选择参考图像的要求,从而避免了配准偏差。该方法最小化基于主成分分析(PCA)的代价函数,利用 qMRI 中的强度变化可以用低维信号模型来描述的事实,但不需要了解特定的采集模型。该方法在 4D CT 肺部数据上进行了评估,并在五个不同 qMRI 应用的真实和合成图像上进行了评估:猪心的 T1 映射、颈动脉的 T1 和 T2 联合映射、腹部的 ADC 映射、大脑的扩散张量映射以及腹部的动态对比增强映射。每个应用都基于不同的采集模型。该方法与基于互信息的成对配准方法和其他四种最先进的分组配准方法进行了比较。通过估计的 qMRI 参数的精度、分割结构的重叠、对应地标之间的距离和变形的平滑度来评估配准精度。在所有 qMRI 应用中,所提出的方法的性能均优于或等同于竞争方法,同时避免了选择参考图像的需要。还表明,传统的成对方法的结果确实取决于此参考图像的选择。因此,我们得出结论,基于 PCA 的相似性度量的分组配准方法是补偿 qMRI 中配准不准确的首选技术。