• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国急诊普通外科患者的风险分层、管理及预后

Risk stratification, management and outcomes in emergency general surgical patients in the UK.

出版信息

Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2014 Oct;40(5):617-24. doi: 10.1007/s00068-014-0399-2. Epub 2014 May 27.

DOI:10.1007/s00068-014-0399-2
PMID:26814520
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The Royal College of Surgeons of England (RCS) published guidance in 2011 setting standards for the management of emergency surgical patients with the aim of reducing surgical mortality. These suggested the presence of a consultant surgeon and anaesthetist, and transfer to a higher level of care postoperatively for all patients deemed high risk.

OBJECTIVE

This prospective multi-institutional study sought to evaluate whether adherence to these standards was associated with reduced mortality.

DESIGN

Data were prospectively collected on all emergency general surgery operations performed in emergency theatres across Merseyside, UK, during a 30-day period in September-October 2011. Patients were risk assessed using P-POSSUM (Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity). High-risk patients were classified as those with a P-POSSUM predicted mortality of ≥10 %, and moderate-risk patients as those with a P-POSSUM predicted mortality of 5-10 %.

RESULTS

Some 494 procedures were performed on 471 patients. Twenty-four patients (5 %) died within 30 days of surgery. Mortality in the 65 patients identified as high risk was 27 % (14 patients undergoing 17 procedures), with a consultant surgeon present in 46 of 65 high-risk cases (71 %), a consultant anaesthetist in 43 (66 %), and 46 (71 %) cases were admitted to level 2 or 3 care postoperatively. There was no association between adherence to standards and postoperative mortality in either the whole cohort or specifically the high-risk group.

CONCLUSIONS

There is currently incomplete adherence to the national guidelines, but this does not seem to adversely impact postoperative mortality.

摘要

引言

英国皇家外科医学院(RCS)于2011年发布了指南,为急诊外科患者的管理设定标准,旨在降低手术死亡率。这些标准建议配备外科顾问医师和麻醉医师,并将所有被视为高风险的患者术后转至更高水平的护理机构。

目的

这项前瞻性多机构研究旨在评估遵守这些标准是否与降低死亡率相关。

设计

前瞻性收集了2011年9月至10月期间在英国默西塞德郡各急诊手术室进行的所有急诊普通外科手术的数据。使用P-POSSUM(死亡率和发病率评估的生理和手术严重程度评分)对患者进行风险评估。高风险患者被定义为P-POSSUM预测死亡率≥10%的患者,中度风险患者为P-POSSUM预测死亡率为5%-10%的患者。

结果

共对471例患者进行了约494例手术。24例患者(5%)在术后30天内死亡。在被确定为高风险的65例患者中,死亡率为27%(14例患者接受了17例手术),65例高风险病例中有46例(71%)有外科顾问医师在场,43例(66%)有麻醉顾问医师在场,46例(71%)病例术后被收治到二级或三级护理机构。在整个队列或特定的高风险组中,遵守标准与术后死亡率之间均无关联。

结论

目前对国家指南的遵守情况并不完全,但这似乎并未对术后死亡率产生不利影响。

相似文献

1
Risk stratification, management and outcomes in emergency general surgical patients in the UK.英国急诊普通外科患者的风险分层、管理及预后
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2014 Oct;40(5):617-24. doi: 10.1007/s00068-014-0399-2. Epub 2014 May 27.
2
Consultant versus trainee led surgery and impact on outcome following an emergency colonic resection.顾问医生主导手术与实习医生主导手术及其对急诊结肠切除术后结局的影响
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2021 Dec;47(6):1797-1803. doi: 10.1007/s00068-020-01369-2. Epub 2020 Apr 24.
3
Risk-adjusted scoring systems in colorectal surgery.结直肠外科手术中的风险调整评分系统。
Int J Surg. 2011;9(2):130-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.10.016. Epub 2010 Nov 5.
4
Efficacy of POSSUM score in predicting the outcome in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy.POSSUM评分在预测急诊剖腹手术患者预后中的效能。
Pol Przegl Chir. 2014 Apr;86(4):159-65. doi: 10.2478/pjs-2014-0029.
5
Prospective comparison of POSSUM and P-POSSUM with clinical assessment of mortality following emergency surgery.急诊手术后,对POSSUM和P-POSSUM与死亡率临床评估的前瞻性比较。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2007 Jan;51(1):94-100. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.01167.x. Epub 2006 Nov 1.
6
The concept of damage control: extending the paradigm to emergency general surgery.损伤控制的概念:将范式扩展至急诊普通外科。
Injury. 2008 Jan;39(1):93-101. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2007.06.011. Epub 2007 Sep 20.
7
[The POSSUM: a good scoring system for predicting mortality in elderly patients undergoing emergency surgery?].[POSSUM评分系统:预测老年急诊手术患者死亡率的良好评分系统?]
Pan Afr Med J. 2016 Jun 28;24:166. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2016.24.166.9528. eCollection 2016.
8
Comparison of the possum, P-POSSUM and Cr-POSSUM scoring systems as predictors of postoperative mortality in patients undergoing major colorectal surgery.负鼠评分系统、P-POSSUM评分系统和Cr-POSSUM评分系统在预测接受大肠大手术患者术后死亡率方面的比较。
ANZ J Surg. 2006 Sep;76(9):812-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2006.03875.x.
9
Risk-adjusted surgical audit with the POSSUM scoring system in a developing country. Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity.在一个发展中国家使用POSSUM评分系统进行风险调整后的外科手术审计。用于计算死亡率和发病率的生理与手术严重程度评分。
Br J Surg. 2002 Jan;89(1):110-3. doi: 10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01979.x.
10
Pre-NELA vs NELA - has anything changed, or is it just an audit exercise?NELA实施前与NELA对比——有什么变化吗,还是仅仅是一次审核工作?
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2016 Nov;98(8):554-559. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2016.0248. Epub 2016 Aug 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Daytime Versus Night-Time Emergency Abdominal Operations: Perspective from a Low-Middle-Income Country.日间与夜间急诊腹部手术:来自中低收入国家的观点。
World J Surg. 2019 Dec;43(12):2967-2972. doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-05160-2.
2
Morbidity and mortality rates after emergency abdominal surgery: an analysis of 4346 patients scheduled for emergency laparotomy or laparoscopy.急诊腹部手术后的发病率和死亡率:对4346例计划进行急诊剖腹手术或腹腔镜检查的患者的分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2017 Jun;402(4):615-623. doi: 10.1007/s00423-016-1493-1. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
3
Identification of the high risk emergency surgical patient: Which risk prediction model should be used?

本文引用的文献

1
When is death inevitable after emergency laparotomy? Analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database.在紧急剖腹手术后何时死亡不可避免?美国外科医师学院国家手术质量改进计划数据库分析。
J Am Coll Surg. 2012 Oct;215(4):503-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.06.004. Epub 2012 Jul 11.
2
Variations in mortality after emergency laparotomy: the first report of the UK Emergency Laparotomy Network.急诊剖腹手术后死亡率的变化:英国急诊剖腹手术网络的首次报告。
Br J Anaesth. 2012 Sep;109(3):368-75. doi: 10.1093/bja/aes165. Epub 2012 Jun 22.
3
Evaluation of five risk prediction models for elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair using the UK National Vascular Database.
高危急诊手术患者的识别:应使用哪种风险预测模型?
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2015 Jul 26;4(3):240-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2015.07.004. eCollection 2015 Sep.
使用英国国家血管数据库评估 5 种择期腹主动脉瘤修复的风险预测模型。
Br J Surg. 2012 May;99(5):673-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.8731. Epub 2012 Mar 13.
4
Managing perioperative risk in patients undergoing elective non-cardiac surgery.管理接受择期非心脏手术患者的围手术期风险。
BMJ. 2011 Oct 5;343:d5759. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d5759.
5
MELD-based indices as predictors of mortality in chronic liver disease patients who undergo emergency surgery with general anesthesia.基于 MELD 的指数作为接受全身麻醉急诊手术的慢性肝病患者死亡率的预测指标。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2011 Nov;15(11):2029-35. doi: 10.1007/s11605-011-1669-5. Epub 2011 Sep 13.
6
The ASA classification and peri-operative risk.美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级与围手术期风险
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2011 Apr;93(3):185-7. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2011.93.3.185a.
7
Clinical risk scores to guide perioperative management.临床风险评分指导围手术期管理。
Postgrad Med J. 2011 Aug;87(1030):535-41. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2010.107169. Epub 2011 Jan 21.
8
Mortality and utilisation of critical care resources amongst high-risk surgical patients in a large NHS trust.大型国民保健服务信托基金中高危外科患者的死亡率及重症监护资源利用情况
Anaesthesia. 2008 Jul;63(7):695-700. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05560.x. Epub 2008 May 16.
9
Identification and characterisation of the high-risk surgical population in the United Kingdom.英国高风险手术人群的识别与特征分析
Crit Care. 2006;10(3):R81. doi: 10.1186/cc4928. Epub 2006 Jun 2.
10
Comparison of P-POSSUM risk-adjusted mortality rates after surgery between patients in the USA and the UK.美国和英国患者术后P-POSSUM风险调整死亡率的比较。
Br J Surg. 2003 Dec;90(12):1593-8. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4347.