Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Radiology, Koege and Roskilde Hospital, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2016 Feb 1;6(1):8. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics6010008.
The purpose of this study was to assess inter- and intra-observer reproducibility of three different analytic methods to evaluate quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography (DCE-CT) measures from gastroesophageal junctional cancer. Twenty-five DCE-CT studies with gastroesophageal junction cancer were selected from a previous longitudinal study. Three radiologists independently reviewed all scans, and one repeated the analysis eight months later for intraobserver analysis. Review of the scans consisted of three analysis methods: (I) Four, fixed small sized regions of interest (2-dimensional (2D) fixed ROIs) placed in the tumor periphery, (II) 2-dimensional regions of interest (2D-ROI) along the tumor border in the tumor center, and (III) 3-dimensional volumes of interest (3D-VOI) containing the entire tumor volume. Arterial flow, blood volume and permeability (k(trans)) were recorded for each observation. Inter- and intra-observer variability were assessed by Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman statistics. Interobserver ICC was excellent for arterial flow (0.88), for blood volume (0.89) and for permeability (0.91) with 3D-VOI analysis. The 95% limits of agreement were narrower for 3D analysis compared to 2D analysis. Three-dimensional volume DCE-CT analysis of gastroesophageal junction cancer provides higher inter- and intra-observer reproducibility with narrower limits of agreement between readers compared to 2D analysis.
本研究旨在评估三种不同的分析方法评估胃食管交界处癌症定量动态对比增强 CT(DCE-CT)测量结果的观察者内和观察者间可重复性。从先前的纵向研究中选择了 25 例胃食管交界处癌症的 DCE-CT 研究。三位放射科医生独立审查了所有扫描,并在 8 个月后进行了一次内部观察者分析。扫描评估包括三种分析方法:(I)四个固定的小感兴趣区(2 维(2D)固定 ROI)置于肿瘤周围,(II)肿瘤中心沿肿瘤边界的 2 维感兴趣区(2D-ROI),以及(III)包含整个肿瘤体积的 3 维感兴趣区(3D-VOI)。记录了每个观察结果的动脉流量、血容量和渗透性(k(trans))。通过组内相关系数(ICC)和 Bland-Altman 统计评估观察者内和观察者间的变异性。对于动脉流量(0.88)、血容量(0.89)和渗透性(0.91),3D-VOI 分析的观察者间 ICC 为优秀。与 2D 分析相比,3D 分析的 95%一致性限更窄。与 2D 分析相比,胃食管交界处癌症的 3D 体积 DCE-CT 分析提供了更高的观察者内和观察者间可重复性,并且读者之间的一致性限更窄。