González-Rodenas Joaquín, Calabuig Ferran, Aranda Rafael
Department of Physical Education and Sport. University of Valencia (Spain).
J Hum Kinet. 2015 Dec 30;49:229-35. doi: 10.1515/hukin-2015-0125. eCollection 2015 Dec 22.
The aim of this study was to compare the effects of game design modification, the type of the goal and the number of players on the intensity of play in small-sided soccer games (SSGs) in youth elite players. Twenty young soccer players (age 13.7 ± 0.5 years, body mass 57.4 ± 7.8 kg, body height 1.67 ± 7.8 m, maximal heart rate 201.1 ± 8.2 beats/min) performed three types of SSGs (possession play (PP) vs. regular goals (RG) vs. small goals (SG)) in both four-a-side and six-a-side formats. The heart rate responses were recorded and analysed as an indicator of the intensity of play. The four-a-side format obtained higher intensity of play than six-a-side for PP (p<0.05), but not for SG and RG. SG showed higher intensity of play than RG for four-a-side (p<0.001), but not for six-a-side. PP registered higher intensity of play than RG (p<0.05), but not than SG in four-a-side, whereas in six-a-side no differences were found between the three formats. In conclusion, the modification of variables such as the number of players, the game design and the type of the goal influences the intensity of play in small-sided soccer games in youth players.
本研究旨在比较游戏设计修改、目标类型和球员数量对青少年精英球员小型足球比赛(SSG)中比赛强度的影响。20名年轻足球运动员(年龄13.7±0.5岁,体重57.4±7.8千克,身高1.67±7.8米,最大心率201.1±8.2次/分钟)以四人制和六人制形式进行了三种类型的小型足球比赛(控球比赛(PP)对阵常规球门(RG)对阵小球门(SG))。记录并分析心率反应,将其作为比赛强度的指标。对于控球比赛,四人制形式的比赛强度高于六人制(p<0.05),但对于小球门比赛和常规球门比赛则不然。对于四人制比赛,小球门比赛的强度高于常规球门比赛(p<0.001),但对于六人制比赛则不然。控球比赛的强度高于常规球门比赛(p<0.05),但在四人制比赛中不高于小球门比赛,而在六人制比赛中,三种形式之间未发现差异。总之,球员数量、游戏设计和目标类型等变量的修改会影响青少年球员小型足球比赛的强度。