González-Rodenas Joaquín, Ferrandis Jordi, Valdó Jorge Carril, Claver-Rabaz Fernando, Ballester Rafael, Gil-Arias Alexander
Sport Sciences Research Centre, Rey Juan Carlos University, Fuenlabrada, Spain.
Faculty of Physical Education & Sport Sciences, Catholic University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
J Hum Kinet. 2024 Dec 19;97:237-247. doi: 10.5114/jhk/194071. eCollection 2025 Apr.
This study explored the impact of different tactical formations (TFs) on positional team behaviors in youth soccer during small sided games (SSGs). Eighteen U19 players participated in 7-a-side SSGs including goalkeepers, alternating between 2-3-1 and 3-1-2 TFs against a consistent opponent in the 3-3 TF. Positional data were collected with WIMU PRO GPS devices (Hudl, USA) to assess collective offensive and defensive dimensions that included teams´ width, length, height, the stretch index, and the surface area. The Mann-Whitney U test revealed that teams employing a 2-3-1 TF in offensive play exhibited increased height (p < 0.001; ES = 0.206), width (p = 0.006; ES = 0.113), and the surface area (p = 0.023; ES = 0.093) compared to the 3-1-2 TF. Conversely, defending with a 2-3-1 TF increased team height (p < 0.001; ES = 0.287) while decreasing length (p < 0.001; ES = 0.189), the surface area (p = 0.005; ES = 0.161), and the stretch index (p < 0.001; ES = 0.183) compared to the 3-1-2 TF. When attacking against a 2-3-1 TF, the offensive team experienced reduced height (p = 0.007; ES = 0.116) but an increased surface area (p < 0.001; ES = 0.241), width (p < 0.001; ES = 0.378) and the stretch index (p < 0.001; ES = 0.326) compared to the 3-1-2 TF. Finally, defending against a 2-3-1 TF resulted in decreased team length (p < 0.001; ES = 0.205), the surface area (p < 0.001; ES = 0.271) and the stretch index (p < 0.001; ES = 0.205) compared to defending against a 3-1-2 TF. Thus, coaches should acknowledge the significant role of TFs in modulating positional behaviors during SSGs, with relevant pedagogical implications for designing effective training sessions.
本研究探讨了在小型足球比赛(SSG)中不同战术阵型(TF)对青少年足球团队位置行为的影响。18名U19球员(包括守门员)参加了七人制SSG,在对阵采用3-3阵型的固定对手时,在2-3-1和3-1-2两种TF之间交替。使用WIMU PRO GPS设备(美国Hudl公司)收集位置数据,以评估集体进攻和防守维度,包括球队的宽度、长度、高度、伸展指数和表面积。曼-惠特尼U检验显示,在进攻时采用2-3-1 TF的球队与3-1-2 TF相比,高度增加(p < 0.001;效应量ES = 0.206)、宽度增加(p = 0.006;ES = 0.113)以及表面积增加(p = 0.023;ES = 0.093)。相反,与3-1-2 TF相比,采用2-3-1 TF防守时球队高度增加(p < 0.001;ES = 0.287),而长度减少(p < 0.001;ES = 0.189)、表面积减少(p = 0.005;ES = 0.161)以及伸展指数减少(p < 0.001;ES = 0.183)。当对阵2-3-1 TF进行进攻时,与3-1-2 TF相比,进攻球队高度降低(p = 0.007;ES = 0.116),但表面积增加(p < 0.001;ES = 0.241)、宽度增加(p < 0.001;ES = 0.378)以及伸展指数增加(p < 0.001;ES = 0.326)。最后,与防守3-1-2 TF相比,防守2-3-1 TF导致球队长度减少(p < 0.001;ES = 0.205)、表面积减少(p < 0.001;ES = 0.271)以及伸展指数减少(p < 0.001;ES = 0.205)。因此,教练应认识到TF在SSG中调节位置行为方面的重要作用,这对设计有效的训练课程具有相关的教学意义。