Suppr超能文献

Reporting of Preclinical Research in Anesthesiology: Transparency and Enforcement.

作者信息

Eisenach James C, Warner David S, Houle Timothy T

机构信息

From the Department of Anesthesiology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina (J.C.E.); Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina (D.S.W.); and Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (T.T.H.).

出版信息

Anesthesiology. 2016 Apr;124(4):763-5. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001044.

Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Reporting of Preclinical Research in Anesthesiology: Transparency and Enforcement.
Anesthesiology. 2016 Apr;124(4):763-5. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001044.
2
[Reporting guidelines: tools to increase the completeness and transparency of your anesthesiology research paper].
Braz J Anesthesiol. 2019 Sep-Oct;69(5):429-431. doi: 10.1016/j.bjan.2019.09.008. Epub 2019 Oct 18.
3
Reporting preclinical anesthesia study (REPEAT): Evaluating the quality of reporting in the preclinical anesthesiology literature.
PLoS One. 2019 May 23;14(5):e0215221. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215221. eCollection 2019.
6
Drug therapy: Preclinical oncology - reporting transparency needed.
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2016 Jan;13(1):8-9. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2015.216. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
7
Sex and gender inclusion, analysis, and reporting in anaesthesia research.
Br J Anaesth. 2020 Mar;124(3):e43-e49. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.12.003. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
9
Selective primary outcome reporting in high-impact journals of anaesthesia and pain.
Br J Anaesth. 2016 Oct;117(4):542-543. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew280.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of redefining statistical significance on P-hacking and false positive rates: An agent-based model.
PLoS One. 2024 May 16;19(5):e0303262. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303262. eCollection 2024.
2
A Scoping Review of the Mechanisms Underlying Developmental Anesthetic Neurotoxicity.
Anesth Analg. 2025 Feb 1;140(2):409-426. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006897. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
3
Navigating regulatory pathways for translation of biologic cartilage repair products.
Sci Transl Med. 2022 Aug 24;14(659):eabp8163. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abp8163.
4
Frontiers in Pain Research: A Scope of Its Focus and Content.
Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2020 Oct 29;1:601528. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2020.601528. eCollection 2020.
5
Revision of the ARRIVE guidelines: rationale and scope.
BMJ Open Sci. 2018 Jun 12;2(1):e000002. doi: 10.1136/bmjos-2018-000002.
6
Reporting preclinical anesthesia study (REPEAT): Evaluating the quality of reporting in the preclinical anesthesiology literature.
PLoS One. 2019 May 23;14(5):e0215221. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215221. eCollection 2019.
7
Study Design Rigor in Animal-Experimental Research Published in Anesthesia Journals.
Anesth Analg. 2018 Jan;126(1):217-222. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001907.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk of Bias in Reports of In Vivo Research: A Focus for Improvement.
PLoS Biol. 2015 Oct 13;13(10):e1002273. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002273. eCollection 2015 Oct.
2
Experimental design and analysis and their reporting: new guidance for publication in BJP.
Br J Pharmacol. 2015 Jul;172(14):3461-71. doi: 10.1111/bph.12856.
4
Translational research in acute central nervous system injury: lessons learned and the future.
JAMA Neurol. 2014 Oct;71(10):1311-8. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.1238.
5
Policy: NIH plans to enhance reproducibility.
Nature. 2014 Jan 30;505(7485):612-3. doi: 10.1038/505612a.
6
Two years later: journals are not yet enforcing the ARRIVE guidelines on reporting standards for pre-clinical animal studies.
PLoS Biol. 2014 Jan;12(1):e1001756. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001756. Epub 2014 Jan 7.
7
Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience.
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013 May;14(5):365-76. doi: 10.1038/nrn3475. Epub 2013 Apr 10.
8
A call for transparent reporting to optimize the predictive value of preclinical research.
Nature. 2012 Oct 11;490(7419):187-91. doi: 10.1038/nature11556.
9
Drug development: Raise standards for preclinical cancer research.
Nature. 2012 Mar 28;483(7391):531-3. doi: 10.1038/483531a.
10
Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets?
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2011 Aug 31;10(9):712. doi: 10.1038/nrd3439-c1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验