Suppr超能文献

参与研究性支气管镜检查:文献综述。

Participation in research bronchoscopy: a literature review.

作者信息

Martinsen Einar Marius Hjellestad, Leiten Elise Orvedal, Bakke Per Sigvald, Eagan Tomas Mikal Lind, Grønseth Rune

机构信息

Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway;

Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.

出版信息

Eur Clin Respir J. 2016 Feb 3;3:29511. doi: 10.3402/ecrj.v3.29511. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

Bronchoscopy is the preferred method for collecting biological samples from the lower airways of subjects in clinical research. However, ensuring participation in clinical research can be challenging when the research includes an invasive procedure. For this report we reviewed the literature to look for information on participation in research bronchoscopy studies to better design our own study, the Bergen COPD Microbiome study (MicroCOPD). We performed a systematic literature search on participation in research bronchoscopy studies in February 2014 using the search engines of PubMed and EMBASE. The literature search resulted in seven relevant papers. Motivation was an end point in six of the seven papers, but reasons for declining participation and recruitment strategies also seemed important. Human subjects participate in research bronchoscopy studies for personal benefit and altruistic reasons. Inconvenience associated with research, in addition to fear of procedures, is considered a barrier. Radio, especially news stations, generated the most inquiries for a clinical study involving bronchoscopy. There is a lack of information on participation in research bronchoscopy studies in the literature. A bronchoscopy study has been initiated at Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway, to examine the role of the microbiome in COPD, and participation will be explored as a substudy.

摘要

支气管镜检查是临床研究中从受试者下呼吸道采集生物样本的首选方法。然而,当研究包括侵入性操作时,确保受试者参与临床研究可能具有挑战性。在本报告中,我们查阅了文献,以寻找关于参与研究性支气管镜检查研究的信息,以便更好地设计我们自己的研究——卑尔根慢性阻塞性肺疾病微生物组研究(MicroCOPD)。2014年2月,我们使用PubMed和EMBASE的搜索引擎,对参与研究性支气管镜检查研究的情况进行了系统的文献检索。文献检索得到了7篇相关论文。在这7篇论文中的6篇中,动机是一个终点,但拒绝参与的原因和招募策略似乎也很重要。人类受试者出于个人利益和利他主义原因参与研究性支气管镜检查研究。除了对操作的恐惧之外,与研究相关的不便也被视为一个障碍。广播,尤其是新闻电台,对一项涉及支气管镜检查的临床研究产生的咨询最多。文献中缺乏关于参与研究性支气管镜检查研究的信息。挪威卑尔根的豪克兰大学医院已经启动了一项支气管镜检查研究,以研究微生物组在慢性阻塞性肺疾病中的作用,并将作为一项子研究探索受试者的参与情况。

相似文献

1
Participation in research bronchoscopy: a literature review.
Eur Clin Respir J. 2016 Feb 3;3:29511. doi: 10.3402/ecrj.v3.29511. eCollection 2016.
2
Motivation and response rates in bronchoscopy studies.
Multidiscip Respir Med. 2019 May 2;14:14. doi: 10.1186/s40248-019-0178-3. eCollection 2019.
3
The Bergen COPD microbiome study (MicroCOPD): rationale, design, and initial experiences.
Eur Clin Respir J. 2014 Dec 29;1. doi: 10.3402/ecrj.v1.26196. eCollection 2014.
4
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
6
Reasons for participation in pain research: can they indicate a lack of informed consent?
Pain Med. 2009 Jan;10(1):111-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2008.00481.x. Epub 2008 Jul 24.
7
[Study of the factors motivating refusal of women to participate to a randomized clinical trial in gynecological surgery. Retrospective observational bicentric study].
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2016 Nov;45(9):1054-1059. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2016.03.001. Epub 2016 Apr 22.
9
Involving South Asian patients in clinical trials.
Health Technol Assess. 2004 Oct;8(42):iii, 1-109. doi: 10.3310/hta8420.

引用本文的文献

2
Single-cell sequencing: Current applications in various tuberculosis specimen types.
Cell Prolif. 2024 Nov;57(11):e13698. doi: 10.1111/cpr.13698. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
5
Motivation and response rates in bronchoscopy studies.
Multidiscip Respir Med. 2019 May 2;14:14. doi: 10.1186/s40248-019-0178-3. eCollection 2019.
6
Microbial communities in swine lungs and their association with lung lesions.
Microb Biotechnol. 2019 Mar;12(2):289-304. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.13353. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
7
Comparing microbiotas in the upper aerodigestive and lower respiratory tracts of lambs.
Microbiome. 2017 Oct 27;5(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s40168-017-0364-5.
8
Microbiota in Exhaled Breath Condensate and the Lung.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2017 May 31;83(12). doi: 10.1128/AEM.00515-17. Print 2017 Jun 15.

本文引用的文献

1
The Bergen COPD microbiome study (MicroCOPD): rationale, design, and initial experiences.
Eur Clin Respir J. 2014 Dec 29;1. doi: 10.3402/ecrj.v1.26196. eCollection 2014.
3
British Thoracic Society guideline for diagnostic flexible bronchoscopy in adults: accredited by NICE.
Thorax. 2013 Aug;68 Suppl 1:i1-i44. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2013-203618.
5
Positive parental attitudes to participating in research involving newborn screened infants with CF.
J Cyst Fibros. 2013 May;12(3):234-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2012.09.001. Epub 2012 Oct 5.
6
Participation in colorectal cancer screening trials after first-time invitation: a systematic review.
Endoscopy. 2011 Dec;43(12):1059-86. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1291430. Epub 2011 Dec 1.
7
Attitudes to participation in a lung cancer screening trial: a qualitative study.
Thorax. 2012 May;67(5):418-25. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-200055. Epub 2011 Nov 21.
8
Analysis of the lung microbiome in the "healthy" smoker and in COPD.
PLoS One. 2011 Feb 22;6(2):e16384. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016384.
9
Induced sputum : whole sample.
Methods Mol Med. 2001;56:93-8. doi: 10.1385/1-59259-151-5:93.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验