Hunter P R, Fraser C A
Division of Hospital Infection, Central Public Health Laboratory, London, England.
J Clin Microbiol. 1989 Oct;27(10):2156-60. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.10.2156-2160.1989.
Four typing methods for the strain differentiation of Candida albicans (morphotyping, resistotyping, extracellular enzyme production, and carbon source assimilation reactions) were compared on a single population of 100 strains. An index of discriminatory power was used to facilitate this comparison. Extracellular enzyme production had poor discriminatory power, and carbon source assimilation reactions were poorly reproducible. Morphotyping and resistotyping had acceptable reproducibility and discrimination. The use of resistotyping and morphotyping in parallel enhanced discrimination without an unacceptable decrease in reproducibility, although other combinations did not enhance discrimination because reproductibility was impaired.
在100株白色念珠菌的单一群体上比较了四种菌株鉴别方法(形态分型、耐药分型、细胞外酶产生和碳源同化反应)。使用鉴别力指数来促进这种比较。细胞外酶产生的鉴别力较差,碳源同化反应的重现性较差。形态分型和耐药分型具有可接受的重现性和鉴别力。并行使用耐药分型和形态分型可增强鉴别力,且重现性不会出现不可接受的下降,尽管其他组合由于重现性受损而无法增强鉴别力。