• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

如何评审一篇外科科学论文:批判性评估指南

How to Review a Surgical Scientific Paper: A Guide for Critical Appraisal.

作者信息

Greco Stephanie H, Davis Catherine H, Hicks Caitlin W, Kaye Alison E, Maxwell Jessica E, Salles Arghavan, Henry Marion C W

机构信息

From the Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA.

Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX.

出版信息

Ann Surg Open. 2021 Jan 19;2(1):e027. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000027. eCollection 2021 Mar.

DOI:10.1097/AS9.0000000000000027
PMID:37638253
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10455126/
Abstract

It is important for surgeons to participate in the peer-review process of scientific literature. As the number of published manuscripts continues to increase, there is a great need for volunteerism in this arena. However, there is little formal or informal training, which can help surgeons provide unbiased and meaningful reviews. Therefore, it is critical to provide more resources and guidelines to aid surgeons during the review process. The purpose of this paper is to provide a structured guide for a quality review of a surgical paper. This review represents the work of the Association of Women Surgeons Publications Committee.

摘要

外科医生参与科学文献的同行评审过程很重要。随着已发表手稿数量持续增加,这个领域非常需要志愿服务。然而,几乎没有正式或非正式培训能帮助外科医生提供公正且有意义的评审。因此,在评审过程中提供更多资源和指导方针以协助外科医生至关重要。本文的目的是为外科论文的高质量评审提供一份结构化指南。本评审代表了女外科医生协会出版委员会的工作。

相似文献

1
How to Review a Surgical Scientific Paper: A Guide for Critical Appraisal.如何评审一篇外科科学论文:批判性评估指南
Ann Surg Open. 2021 Jan 19;2(1):e027. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000027. eCollection 2021 Mar.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
How to review a surgical paper: a guide for junior referees.如何评审一篇外科手术论文:给初级审稿人的指南。
BMC Med. 2016 Feb 14;14:29. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0578-6.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Peer Review in Scientific Publications: Benefits, Critiques, & A Survival Guide.科学出版物中的同行评审:益处、批判及生存指南。
EJIFCC. 2014 Oct 24;25(3):227-43. eCollection 2014 Oct.
6
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
7
Scientific basis of the OCRA method for risk assessment of biomechanical overload of upper limb, as preferred method in ISO standards on biomechanical risk factors.OCRA 方法评估上肢生物力学过载风险的科学基础,作为 ISO 生物力学风险因素标准中的首选方法。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2018 Jul 1;44(4):436-438. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3746.
8
Involving Patient Partners in the KRESCENT Peer Review: Intent, Process, Challenges, and Opportunities.让患者伙伴参与KRESCENT同行评审:目的、过程、挑战与机遇
Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2022 Nov 15;9:20543581221136402. doi: 10.1177/20543581221136402. eCollection 2022.
9
Rules to be adopted for publishing a scientific paper.发表科学论文应采用的规则。
Ann Ital Chir. 2016;87:1-3.
10
Lymphadenopathy in children: A streamlined approach for the surgeon - A report from the APSA Cancer Committee.儿童淋巴结病:外科医生的简化方法 - APSA 癌症委员会报告。
J Pediatr Surg. 2021 Feb;56(2):274-281. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2020.09.058. Epub 2020 Oct 6.

引用本文的文献

1
The art of peer review: Guidelines to become a credible and constructive peer reviewer.同行评议的艺术:成为可信且有建设性的同行评议人的指南。
Semin Vasc Surg. 2022 Dec;35(4):470-478. doi: 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2022.10.002. Epub 2022 Oct 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Reviewing the review: a qualitative assessment of the peer review process in surgical journals.审视同行评议:对外科医学期刊同行评议过程的定性评估
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2018 May 23;3:4. doi: 10.1186/s41073-018-0048-0. eCollection 2018.
2
Conflict of Interest in Journal Peer Review.期刊同行评审中的利益冲突
Toxicol Pathol. 2018 Feb;46(2):112-114. doi: 10.1177/0192623318754792. Epub 2018 Jan 30.
3
How to review a paper: suggestions from the editors of Surgery and the Journal of Surgical Research.如何审阅一篇论文:来自《外科学》与《外科研究杂志》编辑们的建议
J Surg Res. 2017 Jul;215:264-268. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.05.007. Epub 2017 May 4.
4
Avoiding common pitfalls of manuscript and figure preparation.避免手稿和图表准备中的常见陷阱。
FEBS J. 2017 May;284(9):1262-1266. doi: 10.1111/febs.14020.
5
How to review a surgical paper: a guide for junior referees.如何评审一篇外科手术论文:给初级审稿人的指南。
BMC Med. 2016 Feb 14;14:29. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0578-6.
6
How to Review a Manuscript.如何评审一份稿件。
J Electrocardiol. 2016 Mar-Apr;49(2):109-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2016.01.001. Epub 2016 Jan 9.
7
How to review a scientific paper.如何评论一篇科学论文。
Asian J Psychiatr. 2014 Oct;11:124-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2014.08.007. Epub 2014 Aug 27.
8
Peer review guidance: how do you write a good review?同行评审指南:如何撰写一篇优秀的评审意见?
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2013 Dec;113(12):916-20. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2013.070.
9
Choosing the target journal: do authors need a comprehensive approach?选择目标期刊:作者需要采用综合方法吗?
J Korean Med Sci. 2013 Aug;28(8):1117-9. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2013.28.8.1117.
10
Enhancing your manuscript with graphic elements, part 2: figures.用图形元素优化您的稿件,第2部分:图表
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2013 May;113(5):424-31.