Novais Eduardo A, Adhi Mehreen, Moult Eric M, Louzada Ricardo N, Cole Emily D, Husvogt Lennart, Lee ByungKun, Dang Sabin, Regatieri Caio V S, Witkin André J, Baumal Caroline R, Hornegger Joachim, Jayaraman Vijaysekhar, Fujimoto James G, Duker Jay S, Waheed Nadia K
New England Eye Center, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; Federal University of São Paulo, School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil.
New England Eye Center, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Research Laboratory of Electronics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2016 Apr;164:80-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2016.01.011. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
To compare visualization of choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD) using an ultrahigh-speed swept-source (SS) optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) prototype vs a spectral-domain (SD) OCTA device.
Comparative analysis of diagnostic instruments.
Patients were prospectively recruited to be imaged on SD OCT and SS OCT devices on the same day. The SD OCT device employed is the RTVue Avanti (Optovue, Inc, Fremont, California, USA), which operates at ∼840 nm wavelength and 70 000 A-scans/second. The SS OCT device used is an ultrahigh-speed long-wavelength prototype that operates at ∼1050 nm wavelength and 400 000 A-scans/second. Two observers independently measured the CNV area on OCTA en face images from the 2 devices. The nonparametric Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare area measurements and P values of <.05 were considered statistically significant.
Fourteen eyes from 13 patients were enrolled. The CNV in 11 eyes (78.6%) were classified as type 1, 2 eyes (14.3%) as type 2, and 1 eye (7.1%) as mixed type. Total CNV area measured using SS OCT and SD OCT 3 mm × 3 mm OCTA were 0.949 ± 1.168 mm(2) and 0.340 ± 0.301 mm(2), respectively (P = .001). For the 6 mm × 6 mm OCTA the total CNV area using SS OCT and SD OCT were 1.218 ± 1.284 mm(2) and 0.604 ± 0.597 mm(2), respectively (P = .0019). The field of view did not significantly affect the measured CNV area (P = .19 and P = .18 for SS OCT and SD OCT, respectively).
SS OCTA yielded significantly larger CNV areas than SD OCTA. It is possible that SS OCTA is better able to demarcate the full extent of CNV vasculature.
使用超高速扫频源(SS)光学相干断层扫描血管造影(OCTA)原型设备与光谱域(SD)OCTA设备,比较年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD)继发脉络膜新生血管(CNV)的可视化情况。
诊断仪器的对比分析。
前瞻性招募患者,于同一天在SD OCT和SS OCT设备上进行成像。所使用的SD OCT设备为RTVue Avanti(美国加利福尼亚州弗里蒙特市Optovue公司),其工作波长约为840 nm,每秒进行70000次A线扫描。所使用的SS OCT设备是一个超高速长波长原型设备,工作波长约为1050 nm,每秒进行400000次A线扫描。两名观察者独立测量来自这两种设备的OCTA正面图像上的CNV面积。采用非参数Wilcoxon符号秩检验比较面积测量值,P值<.05被认为具有统计学意义。
纳入了13例患者的14只眼。11只眼(78.6%)的CNV被分类为1型,2只眼(14.3%)为2型,1只眼(7.1%)为混合型。使用SS OCT和SD OCT 3 mm×3 mm OCTA测量的总CNV面积分别为0.949±1.168 mm²和0.340±0.301 mm²(P = .001)。对于6 mm×6 mm OCTA,使用SS OCT和SD OCT测量的总CNV面积分别为1.218±1.284 mm²和0.604±0.597 mm²(P = .0019)。视野对测量的CNV面积没有显著影响(SS OCT和SD OCT分别为P = .19和P = .18)。
SS OCTA测量的CNV面积显著大于SD OCTA。SS OCTA可能更能清晰界定CNV脉管系统的全貌。