Aprea Maria Cristina, Bosi Anna, Manara Michele, Mazzocchi Barbara, Pompini Alessandra, Sormani Francesca, Lunghini Liana, Sciarra Gianfranco
a Public Health Laboratory, National Health Service , Siena , Italy.
b Operative Unit Prevention and Safe in Working Place, Public Health Department, National Health Service Piacenza , Italy.
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2016;13(6):476-89. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2016.1143948.
Some evidence of exposure-response of metolachlor and pendimethalin for lung cancer and an association of metribuzin with risk of glioma have been reported. The primary objectives in this study were to evaluate exposure and occupational risk during mixing/loading of pesticides and during their application to tomatoes cultivated in open fields. Sixteen farmers were sampled. Respiratory exposure was estimated by personal air sampling using fiberglass filters in a IOM device. Dermal exposure was assessed using skin pads and hand washing. Absorbed doses were estimated assuming 100% lung retention, and 50% or 10% skin absorption for metribuzin, and pendimethalin and metolachlor, respectively. The three pesticides were quantified by gas chromatography tandem mass spectrometry in all matrices. Metolachlor was used as a tracer of contamination of clothes and tractors unrelated to the exposure monitored. Respiratory exposure to metribuzin, used in granular form, was on average more than one order of magnitude higher than exposure to pendimethalin, used in the form of microencapsulated liquid. The actual doses were 0.067-8.08 µg/kg bw, 0.420-12.6 µg/kg bw, and 0.003-0.877 µg/kg bw for pendimethalin, metribuzin, and metolachlor, respectively. Dermal exposure was about 88% of the actual dose for metribuzin and more than 95%, for pendimethalin and metolachlor. For risk assessment, the total absorbed doses (sum of respiratory and skin absorbed doses) were compared with the AOEL for each compound. The actual and absorbed doses of the three pesticides were always lower than the acceptable operator exposure level (AOEL), which are reported to be 234 µg/kg bw, 20 µg/kg bw, and 150 µg/kg bw for pendimethalin, metribuzin, and metolachlor, respectively. In any case, personal protective equipment and spraying devices should be chosen with care to minimize exposure.
已报告了甲草胺和二甲戊灵对肺癌的暴露-反应的一些证据,以及嗪草酮与胶质瘤风险的关联。本研究的主要目的是评估在农药混合/装载过程中以及在露天种植的番茄上施用农药期间的暴露情况和职业风险。对16名农民进行了采样。通过在IOM装置中使用玻璃纤维滤器进行个人空气采样来估计呼吸道暴露。使用皮肤垫和洗手来评估皮肤暴露。假设肺保留率为100%,嗪草酮的皮肤吸收率为50%,二甲戊灵和甲草胺的皮肤吸收率分别为10%,据此估算吸收剂量。通过气相色谱串联质谱法对所有基质中的三种农药进行定量。甲草胺用作与所监测暴露无关的衣服和拖拉机污染的示踪剂。以颗粒形式使用的嗪草酮的呼吸道暴露平均比以微囊化液体形式使用的二甲戊灵的暴露高一个多数量级。二甲戊灵、嗪草酮和甲草胺的实际剂量分别为0.067-8.08μg/kg体重、0.420-12.6μg/kg体重和0.003-0.877μg/kg体重。嗪草酮的皮肤暴露约占实际剂量的88%,二甲戊灵和甲草胺的皮肤暴露超过95%。为了进行风险评估,将总吸收剂量(呼吸道和皮肤吸收剂量之和)与每种化合物的每日允许暴露量(AOEL)进行比较。三种农药的实际剂量和吸收剂量始终低于可接受的操作人员暴露水平(AOEL),据报告,二甲戊灵、嗪草酮和甲草胺的AOEL分别为234μg/kg体重、20μg/kg体重和150μg/kg体重。在任何情况下,都应谨慎选择个人防护设备和喷雾装置,以尽量减少暴露。