• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

居住隔离、隔离墙与心理健康:一项基于人群的记录链接研究。

Residential segregation, dividing walls and mental health: a population-based record linkage study.

作者信息

Maguire Aideen, French Declan, O'Reilly Dermot

机构信息

Centre for Public Health, Queen's University, Belfast, UK.

School of Management, Queen's University, Belfast, UK.

出版信息

J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016 Sep;70(9):845-54. doi: 10.1136/jech-2015-206888. Epub 2016 Feb 8.

DOI:10.1136/jech-2015-206888
PMID:26858342
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5013154/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Neighbourhood segregation has been described as a fundamental determinant of physical health, but literature on its effect on mental health is less clear. While most previous research has relied on conceptualised measures of segregation, Northern Ireland is unique as it contains physical manifestations of segregation in the form of segregation barriers (or 'peacelines') which can be used to accurately identify residential segregation.

METHODS

We used population-wide health record data on over 1.3 million individuals, to analyse the effect of residential segregation, measured by both the formal Dissimilarity Index and by proximity to a segregation barrier, on the likelihood of poor mental health.

RESULTS

Using multilevel logistic regression models, we found residential segregation measured by the Dissimilarity Index poses no additional risk to the likelihood of poor mental health after adjustment for area-level deprivation. However, residence in an area segregated by a 'peaceline' increases the likelihood of antidepressant medication by 19% (OR=1.19, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.23) and anxiolytic medication by 39% (OR=1.39, 95% CI 1.32 to 1.48), even after adjustment for gender, age, conurbation, deprivation and crime.

CONCLUSIONS

Living in an area segregated by a 'peaceline' is detrimental to mental health suggesting segregated areas characterised by a heightened sense of 'other' pose a greater risk to mental health. The difference in results based on segregation measure highlights the importance of choice of measure when studying segregation.

摘要

背景

社区隔离被认为是身体健康的一个基本决定因素,但关于其对心理健康影响的文献尚不清楚。虽然此前大多数研究依赖于概念化的隔离测量方法,但北爱尔兰很独特,因为它存在以隔离屏障(或“和平线”)形式出现的隔离实体表现,可用于准确识别居住隔离情况。

方法

我们使用了超过130万人的全人群健康记录数据,分析居住隔离(通过正式的差异指数和与隔离屏障的接近程度来衡量)对心理健康状况不佳可能性的影响。

结果

使用多水平逻辑回归模型,我们发现,在对地区层面的贫困状况进行调整后,用差异指数衡量的居住隔离对心理健康状况不佳的可能性没有额外风险。然而,居住在被“和平线”隔离的地区,即使在对性别、年龄、城市区域、贫困状况和犯罪情况进行调整后,抗抑郁药物使用的可能性仍增加19%(比值比=1.19,95%置信区间1.14至1.23),使用抗焦虑药物的可能性增加39%(比值比=1.39,95%置信区间1.32至1.48)。

结论

生活在被“和平线”隔离的地区对心理健康有害,这表明以强烈的“他者”感为特征的隔离地区对心理健康构成更大风险。基于隔离测量方法的结果差异凸显了在研究隔离时测量方法选择的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ef9/5013154/d59cd1344c11/jech-2015-206888f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ef9/5013154/ef7b51ada2ec/jech-2015-206888f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ef9/5013154/d59cd1344c11/jech-2015-206888f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ef9/5013154/ef7b51ada2ec/jech-2015-206888f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ef9/5013154/d59cd1344c11/jech-2015-206888f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Residential segregation, dividing walls and mental health: a population-based record linkage study.居住隔离、隔离墙与心理健康:一项基于人群的记录链接研究。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016 Sep;70(9):845-54. doi: 10.1136/jech-2015-206888. Epub 2016 Feb 8.
2
Residential segregation and mental health among Latinos in a nationally representative survey.在一项具有全国代表性的调查中,拉丁裔人群的居住隔离与心理健康状况
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2017 Apr;71(4):318-323. doi: 10.1136/jech-2016-208034. Epub 2016 Nov 24.
3
Neighborhood residential segregation and mental health: a multilevel analysis on Hispanic Americans in Chicago.邻里居住隔离与心理健康:对芝加哥西班牙裔美国人的多层次分析
Soc Sci Med. 2009 Jun;68(11):1975-84. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.02.040. Epub 2009 Apr 7.
4
Residential segregation and the epidemiology of infectious diseases.居住隔离与传染病流行病学
Soc Sci Med. 2000 Oct;51(8):1143-61. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00016-2.
5
The impact of childhood residential mobility on mental health outcomes in adolescence and early adulthood: a record linkage study.童年时期居住流动性对青少年和成年早期心理健康结果的影响:一项记录链接研究。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016 Mar;70(3):278-85. doi: 10.1136/jech-2015-206123. Epub 2015 Oct 16.
6
Unmet need for mental health medication within the migrant population of Northern Ireland: a record linkage study.北爱尔兰移民群体中心理健康药物的未满足需求:一项记录链接研究。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2021 Mar;75(3):245-250. doi: 10.1136/jech-2019-212774. Epub 2020 Oct 31.
7
Latino residential segregation and self-rated health among Latinos: Washington State Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2012-2014.拉丁裔中的居住隔离与自我评估健康状况:华盛顿州行为风险因素监测系统,2012 - 2014年
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Jun;159:38-47. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.04.035. Epub 2016 May 3.
8
The role of daily mobility in mental health inequalities: the interactive influence of activity space and neighbourhood of residence on depression.日常活动在心理健康不平等中的作用:活动空间和居住社区对抑郁的交互影响。
Soc Sci Med. 2011 Oct;73(8):1133-44. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.08.009. Epub 2011 Aug 26.
9
The Effects of Residential Segregation and Neighborhood Characteristics on Surgery and Survival in Patients with Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.居住隔离和邻里特征对早期非小细胞肺癌患者手术及生存的影响
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2016 May;25(5):750-8. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-1126.
10
Does conurbation affect the risk of poor mental health? A population based record linkage study.城市群是否会影响心理健康不良的风险?基于人群的记录链接研究。
Health Place. 2015 Jul;34:126-34. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2015.05.003. Epub 2015 May 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Stage at diagnosis and breast cancer-specific mortality in breast cancer patients treated with antidepressants, anxiolytics, and antipsychotics: a population-based cohort study from Northern Ireland.使用抗抑郁药、抗焦虑药和抗精神病药治疗的乳腺癌患者的诊断分期及乳腺癌特异性死亡率:一项来自北爱尔兰的基于人群的队列研究。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2025 Aug;213(1):137-150. doi: 10.1007/s10549-025-07766-8. Epub 2025 Jul 5.
2
Using residents and experts to evaluate the validity of areal wombling for detecting social boundaries: A small-scale feasibility study.利用居民和专家评估真实漫游检测社会边界的有效性:一项小规模可行性研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 26;19(8):e0305774. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305774. eCollection 2024.
3

本文引用的文献

1
What does Self Rated Mental Health Represent.自评心理健康代表着什么。
J Public Health Res. 2014 Dec 2;3(3):287. doi: 10.4081/jphr.2014.287.
2
Psychotropic medications and the transition into care: a national data linkage study.精神药物与护理过渡:一项全国性数据关联研究。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013 Feb;61(2):215-21. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12101. Epub 2013 Jan 15.
3
Metropolitan-level racial residential segregation and black-white disparities in hypertension.大都市层面的种族居住隔离与高血压的黑白差异。
Residential segregation and prenatal depression in a non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic cohort in North Carolina.
北卡罗来纳州非西班牙裔黑人和西班牙裔人群中的居住隔离与产前抑郁。
Ann Epidemiol. 2023 Jul;83:15-22. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2023.04.015. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
4
The ethnic density effect in psychosis: a systematic review and multilevel meta-analysis.精神病中的民族密度效应:系统综述和多层次荟萃分析。
Br J Psychiatry. 2021 Dec;219(6):632-643. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2021.96.
5
The psychology of separation: Border walls, soft power, and international neighborliness.分离的心理学:边境墙、软实力和国际睦邻关系。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Jan 25;119(4). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2117797119.
6
Documenting Behavioral Health Needs in an Urban Setting.记录城市环境中的行为健康需求。
Front Public Health. 2021 Aug 30;9:493884. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.493884. eCollection 2021.
7
The association between self-reported mental health, medication record and suicide risk: A population wide study.自我报告的心理健康、用药记录与自杀风险之间的关联:一项全人群研究。
SSM Popul Health. 2021 Feb 2;13:100749. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100749. eCollection 2021 Mar.
8
Association between neighbourhood characteristics and antidepressant use at older ages: a register-based study of urban areas in three European countries.社区特征与老年人使用抗抑郁药之间的关联:三个欧洲国家城市地区的基于登记的研究。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2021 May;75(5):426-432. doi: 10.1136/jech-2020-214276. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
9
Factors Associated with Mortality Including Nursing Home Transitions: A Retrospective Analysis of 25,418 People Prescribed Anti-Dementia Drugs in Northern Ireland.与死亡率相关的因素,包括入住养老院:对北爱尔兰 25418 名开抗痴呆症药物处方的人的回顾性分析。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2020;73(3):1233-1242. doi: 10.3233/JAD-190751.
10
Antidepressant medication use among working age first-generation migrants resident in Finland: an administrative data linkage study.在芬兰居住的工作年龄第一代移民中使用抗抑郁药物的情况:一项基于行政数据的关联研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2019 Oct 16;18(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-1060-9.
Am J Epidemiol. 2011 Sep 1;174(5):537-45. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwr116. Epub 2011 Jun 22.
4
Do measures matter? Comparing surface-density-derived and census-tract-derived measures of racial residential segregation.措施是否重要?比较基于表面密度和人口普查区的种族居住隔离的衡量标准。
Int J Health Geogr. 2010 Jun 12;9:29. doi: 10.1186/1476-072X-9-29.
5
Neighborhoods and health.社区与健康。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010 Feb;1186:125-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05333.x.
6
Variations in anxiolytic and hypnotic prescribing by GPs: a cross-sectional analysis using data from the UK Quality and Outcomes Framework.全科医生开具抗焦虑和催眠药物的差异:一项基于英国质量与结果框架数据的横断面分析。
Br J Gen Pract. 2009 Jun;59(563):e191-8. doi: 10.3399/bjgp09X420923.
7
Is segregation bad for your health?隔离对健康有害吗?
Epidemiol Rev. 2009;31:178-94. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxp001. Epub 2009 May 23.
8
Residential segregation and health in Northern Ireland.北爱尔兰的居住隔离与健康状况。
Health Place. 2009 Sep;15(3):873-81. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2009.02.012. Epub 2009 Mar 10.
9
An algorithm to identify antidepressant users with a diagnosis of depression from prescription data.一种从处方数据中识别被诊断为抑郁症的抗抑郁药使用者的算法。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2009 Jan;18(1):7-15. doi: 10.1002/pds.1677.
10
Are neighbourhood characteristics associated with depressive symptoms? A review of evidence.邻里特征与抑郁症状有关联吗?证据综述。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2008 Nov;62(11):940-6, 8 p following 946. doi: 10.1136/jech.2007.066605. Epub 2008 Sep 5.