Simner Patricia J, Doerr Kelly A, Steinmetz Lory K, Wengenack Nancy L
Division of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Division of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
J Clin Microbiol. 2016 Apr;54(4):1089-93. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02838-15. Epub 2016 Feb 10.
Mycobacterial cultures are historically performed using a liquid medium and a solid agar medium with an incubation period of up to 60 days. We performed a retrospective analysis of 21,494 mycobacterial and aerobic actinomycetes cultures performed over 10 months to determine whether two medium types remain necessary and to investigate whether culture incubation length can be shortened. Specimens were cultured using Bactec MGIT liquid medium and Middlebrook 7H11/S7H11 solid medium with incubation periods of 42 and 60 days, respectively. Time-to-positivity and the identity of isolates recovered from each medium were evaluated. A total of 1,205/21,494 cultures (6%) were positive on at least one medium. Of the 1,353 isolates recovered, 1,110 (82%) were nontuberculous mycobacteria, 145 (11%) were aerobic actinomycetes, and 98 (7%) wereMycobacterium tuberculosiscomplex. Assessing medium types, 1,121 isolates were recovered from solid medium cultures, 922 isolates were recovered from liquid medium cultures, and 690 isolates were recovered on both media. Liquid cultures were positive an average of 10 days before solid cultures when the two medium types were positive (P< 0.0001). Isolates detected on solid medium after 6 weeks of incubation included 65 (5%) nontuberculous mycobacteria, 4 (0.3%) aerobic actinomycetes, and 2 (0.2%) isolates from theM. tuberculosiscomplex. Medical chart review suggested that most of these later-growing isolates were insignificant, as the diagnosis was already known, or they were considered colonizers/contaminants. This study reaffirms the need for both liquid medium and solid medium for mycobacterial and aerobic actinomycetes culture and demonstrates that solid medium incubation times may be reduced to 6 weeks without significantly impacting sensitivity.
传统上,分枝杆菌培养采用液体培养基和固体琼脂培养基,培养期长达60天。我们对10个月内进行的21494例分枝杆菌和好氧放线菌培养进行了回顾性分析,以确定是否仍需要两种培养基类型,并研究培养孵育时间是否可以缩短。使用Bactec MGIT液体培养基和Middlebrook 7H11/S7H11固体培养基分别在42天和60天的孵育期内对标本进行培养。评估了每种培养基的阳性时间和分离株的鉴定结果。在21494例培养物中,共有1205例(6%)在至少一种培养基上呈阳性。在回收的1353株分离株中,1110株(82%)为非结核分枝杆菌,145株(11%)为好氧放线菌,98株(7%)为结核分枝杆菌复合群。评估培养基类型,从固体培养基培养物中回收了1121株分离株,从液体培养基培养物中回收了922株分离株,两种培养基上均回收了690株分离株。当两种培养基类型均呈阳性时,液体培养物比固体培养物平均早10天呈阳性(P<0.0001)。孵育6周后在固体培养基上检测到的分离株包括65株(5%)非结核分枝杆菌、4株(0.3%)好氧放线菌和2株(0.2%)结核分枝杆菌复合群分离株。病历审查表明,这些后期生长的分离株大多无意义,因为诊断已经明确,或者它们被视为定植菌/污染物。本研究再次证实了分枝杆菌和好氧放线菌培养需要液体培养基和固体培养基,并表明固体培养基孵育时间可缩短至6周,而不会显著影响敏感性。