Suppr超能文献

修复言语不流畅加工中的预测:来自视觉世界范式的证据。

Prediction in the processing of repair disfluencies: Evidence from the visual-world paradigm.

作者信息

Lowder Matthew W, Ferreira Fernanda

机构信息

Department of Psychology.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016 Sep;42(9):1400-16. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000256. Epub 2016 Feb 11.

Abstract

Two visual-world eye-tracking experiments investigated the role of prediction in the processing of repair disfluencies (e.g., "The chef reached for some salt uh I mean some ketchup . . ."). Experiment 1 showed that listeners were more likely to fixate a critical distractor item (e.g., pepper) during the processing of repair disfluencies compared with the processing of coordination structures (e.g., ". . . some salt and also some ketchup . . ."). Experiment 2 replicated the findings of Experiment 1 for disfluency versus coordination constructions and also showed that the pattern of fixations to the critical distractor for disfluency constructions was similar to the fixation patterns for sentences employing contrastive focus (e.g., ". . . not some salt but rather some ketchup . . ."). The results suggest that similar mechanisms underlie the processing of repair disfluencies and contrastive focus, with listeners generating sets of entities that stand in semantic contrast to the reparandum in the case of disfluencies or the negated entity in the case of contrastive focus. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

两项视觉世界眼动追踪实验研究了预测在修复不流畅表达(例如,“厨师伸手去拿一些盐,呃,我是说一些番茄酱……”)加工过程中的作用。实验1表明,与处理并列结构(例如,“……一些盐还有一些番茄酱……”)相比,听众在处理修复不流畅表达时更有可能注视关键干扰项(例如,胡椒)。实验2重复了实验1关于不流畅表达与并列结构的研究结果,并且还表明,对于不流畅表达结构,对关键干扰项的注视模式与使用对比焦点的句子(例如,“……不是一些盐而是一些番茄酱……”)的注视模式相似。结果表明,修复不流畅表达和对比焦点的加工过程存在相似的机制,在不流畅表达的情况下,听众会生成与被修正项形成语义对比的实体集,在对比焦点的情况下,会生成与被否定实体形成语义对比的实体集。(PsycINFO数据库记录)

相似文献

1
Prediction in the processing of repair disfluencies: Evidence from the visual-world paradigm.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016 Sep;42(9):1400-16. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000256. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
2
Phonological versus semantic prediction in focus and repair constructions: No evidence for differential predictions.
Cogn Psychol. 2019 Aug;112:25-47. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2019.04.001. Epub 2019 May 9.
3
Prediction in the Processing of Repair Disfluencies.
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2016 Jan;31(1):73-79. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2015.1036089. Epub 2015 Apr 21.
4
Processing of Self-Repairs in Stuttered and Non-Stuttered Speech.
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2020;35(1):93-105. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2019.1628284. Epub 2019 Jun 26.
5
Event processing in the visual world: Projected motion paths during spoken sentence comprehension.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016 May;42(5):804-12. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000199. Epub 2015 Oct 19.
6
Lexical interference effects in sentence processing: evidence from the visual world paradigm and self-organizing models.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 Mar;40(2):326-47. doi: 10.1037/a0034903. Epub 2013 Nov 18.
7
To err is human; to structurally prime from errors is also human.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 May;39(3):985-92. doi: 10.1037/a0029525. Epub 2012 Jul 30.
8
Preliminary study of disfluency in school-aged children with autism.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2014 Jan-Feb;49(1):75-89. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12048. Epub 2013 Sep 11.
9
Negation in context: Evidence from the visual world paradigm.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016;69(6):1082-92. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1063675. Epub 2015 Jul 28.
10
If you say thee uh you are describing something hard: the on-line attribution of disfluency during reference comprehension.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 Sep;33(5):914-30. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.5.914.

引用本文的文献

1
Information entropy facilitates (not impedes) lexical processing during language comprehension.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Oct;31(5):2102-2117. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02463-x. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
2
Temporary ambiguity and memory for the context of spoken language.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Aug;29(4):1440-1450. doi: 10.3758/s13423-022-02088-y. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
3
Processing of Self-Repairs in Stuttered and Non-Stuttered Speech.
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2020;35(1):93-105. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2019.1628284. Epub 2019 Jun 26.
4
Integration and Prediction in Language Processing: A Synthesis of Old and New.
Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2018 Dec;27(6):443-448. doi: 10.1177/0963721418794491. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
5
I see what you meant to say: Anticipating speech errors during online sentence processing.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2019 Oct;148(10):1849-1858. doi: 10.1037/xge0000544. Epub 2018 Dec 17.

本文引用的文献

1
What do we mean by prediction in language comprehension?
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2016;31(1):32-59. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2015.1102299. Epub 2015 Nov 13.
2
Prediction in the Processing of Repair Disfluencies.
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2016 Jan;31(1):73-79. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2015.1036089. Epub 2015 Apr 21.
3
Focus takes time: structural effects on reading.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Dec;22(6):1733-8. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0843-2.
4
Effects of prediction and contextual support on lexical processing: prediction takes precedence.
Cognition. 2015 Mar;136:135-49. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.10.017. Epub 2014 Dec 8.
5
Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal.
J Mem Lang. 2013 Apr;68(3). doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001.
6
Newness, Givenness and Discourse Updating: Evidence from Eye Movements.
J Mem Lang. 2014 Feb 1;71(1). doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2013.10.003.
7
A noisy-channel account of crosslinguistic word-order variation.
Psychol Sci. 2013 Jul 1;24(7):1079-88. doi: 10.1177/0956797612463705. Epub 2013 May 6.
8
Rational integration of noisy evidence and prior semantic expectations in sentence interpretation.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 May 14;110(20):8051-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1216438110. Epub 2013 May 1.
10
Generalized event knowledge activation during online sentence comprehension.
J Mem Lang. 2012 May 1;66(4):545-567. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.01.001.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验