• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

修复言语不流畅加工中的预测:来自视觉世界范式的证据。

Prediction in the processing of repair disfluencies: Evidence from the visual-world paradigm.

作者信息

Lowder Matthew W, Ferreira Fernanda

机构信息

Department of Psychology.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016 Sep;42(9):1400-16. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000256. Epub 2016 Feb 11.

DOI:10.1037/xlm0000256
PMID:26866657
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4981572/
Abstract

Two visual-world eye-tracking experiments investigated the role of prediction in the processing of repair disfluencies (e.g., "The chef reached for some salt uh I mean some ketchup . . ."). Experiment 1 showed that listeners were more likely to fixate a critical distractor item (e.g., pepper) during the processing of repair disfluencies compared with the processing of coordination structures (e.g., ". . . some salt and also some ketchup . . ."). Experiment 2 replicated the findings of Experiment 1 for disfluency versus coordination constructions and also showed that the pattern of fixations to the critical distractor for disfluency constructions was similar to the fixation patterns for sentences employing contrastive focus (e.g., ". . . not some salt but rather some ketchup . . ."). The results suggest that similar mechanisms underlie the processing of repair disfluencies and contrastive focus, with listeners generating sets of entities that stand in semantic contrast to the reparandum in the case of disfluencies or the negated entity in the case of contrastive focus. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

两项视觉世界眼动追踪实验研究了预测在修复不流畅表达(例如,“厨师伸手去拿一些盐,呃,我是说一些番茄酱……”)加工过程中的作用。实验1表明,与处理并列结构(例如,“……一些盐还有一些番茄酱……”)相比,听众在处理修复不流畅表达时更有可能注视关键干扰项(例如,胡椒)。实验2重复了实验1关于不流畅表达与并列结构的研究结果,并且还表明,对于不流畅表达结构,对关键干扰项的注视模式与使用对比焦点的句子(例如,“……不是一些盐而是一些番茄酱……”)的注视模式相似。结果表明,修复不流畅表达和对比焦点的加工过程存在相似的机制,在不流畅表达的情况下,听众会生成与被修正项形成语义对比的实体集,在对比焦点的情况下,会生成与被否定实体形成语义对比的实体集。(PsycINFO数据库记录)

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c49a/4981572/fe9ee5b25b5c/nihms755692f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c49a/4981572/e4c25743c4a0/nihms755692f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c49a/4981572/e6aec02c5cfb/nihms755692f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c49a/4981572/261a4194128d/nihms755692f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c49a/4981572/627f6462803a/nihms755692f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c49a/4981572/fe9ee5b25b5c/nihms755692f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c49a/4981572/e4c25743c4a0/nihms755692f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c49a/4981572/e6aec02c5cfb/nihms755692f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c49a/4981572/261a4194128d/nihms755692f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c49a/4981572/627f6462803a/nihms755692f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c49a/4981572/fe9ee5b25b5c/nihms755692f5.jpg

相似文献

1
Prediction in the processing of repair disfluencies: Evidence from the visual-world paradigm.修复言语不流畅加工中的预测:来自视觉世界范式的证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016 Sep;42(9):1400-16. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000256. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
2
Phonological versus semantic prediction in focus and repair constructions: No evidence for differential predictions.焦点与修复结构中的语音预测与语义预测:没有证据表明存在差异预测。
Cogn Psychol. 2019 Aug;112:25-47. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2019.04.001. Epub 2019 May 9.
3
Prediction in the Processing of Repair Disfluencies.修复言语不流畅过程中的预测
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2016 Jan;31(1):73-79. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2015.1036089. Epub 2015 Apr 21.
4
Processing of Self-Repairs in Stuttered and Non-Stuttered Speech.口吃和非口吃言语中自我修复的处理
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2020;35(1):93-105. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2019.1628284. Epub 2019 Jun 26.
5
Event processing in the visual world: Projected motion paths during spoken sentence comprehension.视觉世界中的事件处理:口语句子理解过程中的预测运动路径
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016 May;42(5):804-12. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000199. Epub 2015 Oct 19.
6
Lexical interference effects in sentence processing: evidence from the visual world paradigm and self-organizing models.词汇干扰效应对句子处理的影响:来自视觉世界范式和自组织模型的证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 Mar;40(2):326-47. doi: 10.1037/a0034903. Epub 2013 Nov 18.
7
To err is human; to structurally prime from errors is also human.犯错是人之常情;从错误中进行结构启动也是人之常情。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 May;39(3):985-92. doi: 10.1037/a0029525. Epub 2012 Jul 30.
8
Preliminary study of disfluency in school-aged children with autism.自闭症儿童口语不流畅的初步研究。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2014 Jan-Feb;49(1):75-89. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12048. Epub 2013 Sep 11.
9
Negation in context: Evidence from the visual world paradigm.语境中的否定:来自视觉世界范式的证据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016;69(6):1082-92. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1063675. Epub 2015 Jul 28.
10
If you say thee uh you are describing something hard: the on-line attribution of disfluency during reference comprehension.如果你说“thee uh”,你是在描述一些困难的事情:指代理解过程中不流畅的在线归因。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 Sep;33(5):914-30. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.5.914.

引用本文的文献

1
Information entropy facilitates (not impedes) lexical processing during language comprehension.信息熵促进(而非阻碍)语言理解过程中的词汇处理。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Oct;31(5):2102-2117. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02463-x. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
2
Temporary ambiguity and memory for the context of spoken language.口语语境中暂时的歧义与记忆。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Aug;29(4):1440-1450. doi: 10.3758/s13423-022-02088-y. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
3
Processing of Self-Repairs in Stuttered and Non-Stuttered Speech.口吃和非口吃言语中自我修复的处理
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2020;35(1):93-105. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2019.1628284. Epub 2019 Jun 26.
4
Integration and Prediction in Language Processing: A Synthesis of Old and New.语言处理中的整合与预测:新旧融合
Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2018 Dec;27(6):443-448. doi: 10.1177/0963721418794491. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
5
I see what you meant to say: Anticipating speech errors during online sentence processing.我明白你的意思了:在线句子处理中预测言语错误。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2019 Oct;148(10):1849-1858. doi: 10.1037/xge0000544. Epub 2018 Dec 17.

本文引用的文献

1
What do we mean by prediction in language comprehension?我们所说的语言理解中的预测是什么意思?
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2016;31(1):32-59. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2015.1102299. Epub 2015 Nov 13.
2
Prediction in the Processing of Repair Disfluencies.修复言语不流畅过程中的预测
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2016 Jan;31(1):73-79. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2015.1036089. Epub 2015 Apr 21.
3
Focus takes time: structural effects on reading.专注力需要时间:阅读的结构效应
Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Dec;22(6):1733-8. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0843-2.
4
Effects of prediction and contextual support on lexical processing: prediction takes precedence.预测和语境支持对词汇加工的影响:预测占主导地位。
Cognition. 2015 Mar;136:135-49. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.10.017. Epub 2014 Dec 8.
5
Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal.用于验证性假设检验的随机效应结构:保持其最大化。
J Mem Lang. 2013 Apr;68(3). doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001.
6
Newness, Givenness and Discourse Updating: Evidence from Eye Movements.新颖性、已知性与话语更新:来自眼动的证据
J Mem Lang. 2014 Feb 1;71(1). doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2013.10.003.
7
A noisy-channel account of crosslinguistic word-order variation.一种关于语言间语序变化的噪声信道解释。
Psychol Sci. 2013 Jul 1;24(7):1079-88. doi: 10.1177/0956797612463705. Epub 2013 May 6.
8
Rational integration of noisy evidence and prior semantic expectations in sentence interpretation.合理整合句子解释中的嘈杂证据和先验语义期望。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 May 14;110(20):8051-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1216438110. Epub 2013 May 1.
9
Multiple Influences of Semantic Memory on Sentence Processing: Distinct Effects of Semantic Relatedness on Violations of Real-World Event/State Knowledge and Animacy Selection Restrictions.语义记忆对句子处理的多重影响:语义相关性对违背现实世界事件/状态知识及生命性选择限制的不同作用。
J Mem Lang. 2012 Nov 1;67(4):426-448. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.07.003. Epub 2012 Sep 6.
10
Generalized event knowledge activation during online sentence comprehension.在线句子理解过程中的广义事件知识激活
J Mem Lang. 2012 May 1;66(4):545-567. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.01.001.