• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估选定的社区层面干预措施对三个国家关键孕产妇、儿童健康及预防母婴传播艾滋病毒结局的有效性(“认可”项目):一项随机对照试验的研究方案

Evaluating the effectiveness of selected community-level interventions on key maternal, child health, and prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV outcomes in three countries (the ACCLAIM Project): a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Woelk Godfrey B, Kieffer Mary Pat, Walker Damilola, Mpofu Daphne, Machekano Rhoderick

机构信息

Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation, 1140 Connecticut Avenue NW, Suite 200, Washington, DC, 20036, USA.

USAID/Bureau for Global Health (BGH)/Office of HIV/AIDS, Washington, DC, USA.

出版信息

Trials. 2016 Feb 16;17:88. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1202-y.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-016-1202-y
PMID:26883307
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4754877/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Efforts to scale up and improve programs for prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV (PMTCT) have focused primarily at the health facility level, and limited attention has been paid to defining an effective set of community interventions to improve demand and uptake of services and retention. Many barriers to PMTCT are also barriers to pregnancy, childbirth, and postnatal care faced by mothers regardless of HIV status. Demand for maternal and child health (MCH) and PMTCT services can be limited by critical social, cultural, and structural barriers. Yet, rigorous evaluation has shown limited evidence of effectiveness of multilevel community-wide interventions aimed at improving MCH and HIV outcomes for pregnant women living with HIV. We propose to assess the effect of a package of multilevel community interventions: a social learning and action component, community dialogues, and peer-led discussion groups, on the demand for, uptake of, and retention of HIV positive pregnant/postpartum women in MCH/PMTCT services.

METHODS/DESIGN: This study will undertake a three-arm randomized trial in Swaziland, Uganda, and Zimbabwe. Districts/regions (n = 9) with 45 PMTCT-implementing health facilities and their catchment areas (populations 7,300-27,500) will be randomly allocated to three intervention arms: 1) community leader engagement, 2) community leader engagement with community days, or 3) community leader engagement with community days and male and female community peer groups. The primary study outcome is HIV exposed infants (HEIs) returning to the health facility within 2 months for early infant diagnosis (EID) of HIV. Secondary study outcomes include gestational age of women attending for first antenatal care, male partners tested for HIV, and HEIs receiving nevirapine prophylaxis at birth. Changes in community knowledge, attitudes, practices, and beliefs on MCH/PMTCT will be assessed through household surveys.

DISCUSSION

Implementation of the protocol necessitated changes in the original study design. We purposively selected facilities in the districts/regions though originally the study clusters were to be randomly selected. Lifelong antiretroviral therapy for all HIV positive pregnant and lactating women, Option B+, was implemented in the three countries during the study period, with the potential for a differential impact by study arm. Implementation however, was rapidly done across the districts/regions, so that there is unlikely be this potential confounding. We developed a system of monitoring and documentation of potential confounding activities or actions, and these data will be incorporated into analyses at the conclusion of the project. Strengthens of the study are that it tests multilevel interventions, utilizes program as well as study specific and individual data, and it is conducted under "real conditions" leading to more robust findings. Limitations of the protocol include the lack of a true control arm and inadequate control for the potential effect of Option B+, such as the intensification of messages as the importance of early ANC and male partner testing.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov (study ID: NCT01971710) Protocol version 5, 30 July 2013, registered 13 August 2013.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c913/4754877/bcfd797249d3/13063_2016_1202_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c913/4754877/18c32dac5e35/13063_2016_1202_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c913/4754877/35130d27bdb9/13063_2016_1202_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c913/4754877/bcfd797249d3/13063_2016_1202_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c913/4754877/18c32dac5e35/13063_2016_1202_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c913/4754877/35130d27bdb9/13063_2016_1202_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c913/4754877/bcfd797249d3/13063_2016_1202_Fig3_HTML.jpg
摘要

背景

扩大并改进预防艾滋病母婴传播(PMTCT)项目的努力主要集中在医疗机构层面,而对于确定一套有效的社区干预措施以提高服务需求、利用率和留存率的关注有限。无论母亲的艾滋病毒感染状况如何,许多PMTCT的障碍也是她们在怀孕、分娩和产后护理中面临的障碍。母婴健康(MCH)和PMTCT服务的需求可能受到关键的社会、文化和结构障碍的限制。然而,严格的评估表明,旨在改善感染艾滋病毒孕妇的母婴健康和艾滋病毒相关结果的多层次社区干预措施的有效性证据有限。我们建议评估一套多层次社区干预措施的效果:一个社会学习与行动组成部分、社区对话以及同伴主导的讨论小组,对感染艾滋病毒的怀孕/产后妇女对妇幼保健/预防艾滋病母婴传播服务的需求、利用率和留存率的影响。

方法/设计:本研究将在斯威士兰、乌干达和津巴布韦进行一项三臂随机试验。将有45个实施预防艾滋病母婴传播项目的医疗机构及其服务区域(人口7300 - 27500)的地区/区域(n = 9)随机分配到三个干预组:1)社区领袖参与;2)社区领袖参与社区日活动;3)社区领袖参与社区日活动以及男性和女性社区同伴小组。主要研究结果是艾滋病毒暴露婴儿(HEIs)在2个月内返回医疗机构进行艾滋病毒早期婴儿诊断(EID)。次要研究结果包括首次产前检查的妇女的孕周、接受艾滋病毒检测的男性伴侣以及出生时接受奈韦拉平预防的HEIs。将通过家庭调查评估社区对妇幼保健/预防艾滋病母婴传播的知识、态度、行为和信念的变化。

讨论

方案的实施需要对原研究设计进行更改。我们有目的地在地区/区域中选择了医疗机构,尽管最初研究组应随机选择。在研究期间,这三个国家对所有感染艾滋病毒的怀孕和哺乳期妇女实施了终身抗逆转录病毒疗法,即选项B +,这可能对各研究组产生不同影响。然而,该疗法在各地区/区域迅速实施,因此不太可能存在这种潜在的混杂因素。我们开发了一个监测和记录潜在混杂活动或行动的系统,这些数据将在项目结束时纳入分析。该研究的优势在于它测试了多层次干预措施,利用了项目数据以及特定研究和个体数据,并且是在“实际情况”下进行的,从而得出更可靠的结果。方案的局限性包括缺乏真正的对照组,以及对选项B +的潜在影响控制不足,例如强化了早期产前检查和男性伴侣检测重要性的信息。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov(研究编号:NCT01971710)方案版本5, 2013年7月30日,于2013年8月13日注册。

相似文献

1
Evaluating the effectiveness of selected community-level interventions on key maternal, child health, and prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV outcomes in three countries (the ACCLAIM Project): a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.评估选定的社区层面干预措施对三个国家关键孕产妇、儿童健康及预防母婴传播艾滋病毒结局的有效性(“认可”项目):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2016 Feb 16;17:88. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1202-y.
2
Project ACCLAIM: Intervention Effect on Community Knowledge, Attitudes and Beliefs of Maternal and Child Health and HIV/AIDS in Eswatini, Uganda and Zimbabwe.项目 ACCLAIM:在斯威士兰、乌干达和津巴布韦,干预对母婴健康和艾滋病毒/艾滋病的社区知识、态度和信念的影响。
AIDS Behav. 2021 Aug;25(8):2400-2409. doi: 10.1007/s10461-021-03202-2. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
The Enhanced Mentor Mother ProgrAm (EMMA) for the prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV in Kenya: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial.肯尼亚预防母婴传播艾滋病毒的强化指导母亲计划(EMMA):一项整群随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2018 Oct 30;19(1):594. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2975-y.
5
Evaluation of a community health worker intervention and the World Health Organization's Option B versus Option A to improve antenatal care and PMTCT outcomes in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: study protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled health systems implementation trial.评估社区卫生工作者干预措施以及世界卫生组织的方案B与方案A在坦桑尼亚达累斯萨拉姆改善产前护理和预防母婴传播结果方面的效果:一项整群随机对照卫生系统实施试验的研究方案
Trials. 2014 Sep 15;15:359. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-359.
6
Integrating prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission (PMTCT) programmes with other health services for preventing HIV infection and improving HIV outcomes in developing countries.在发展中国家,将预防母婴传播艾滋病毒(PMTCT)项目与其他预防艾滋病毒感染及改善艾滋病毒防治效果的卫生服务相结合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jun 15(6):CD008741. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008741.pub2.
7
Implementing comprehensive prevention of mother-to-child transmission and HIV prevention for South African couples: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.为南非夫妇实施母婴传播综合预防及艾滋病预防:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2014 Oct 27;15:417. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-417.
8
Enhanced peer-group strategies to support the prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission leads to increased retention in care in Uganda: A randomized controlled trial.增强同伴群体策略以支持预防母婴传播艾滋病毒可提高乌干达的护理保留率:一项随机对照试验。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 19;19(4):e0297652. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297652. eCollection 2024.
9
Community-facility linkage models and maternal and infant health outcomes in Malawi's PMTCT/ART program: A cohort study. Malawi 母婴传播预防项目中社区卫生机构链接模式与母婴健康结局:一项队列研究
PLoS Med. 2021 Sep 17;18(9):e1003780. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003780. eCollection 2021 Sep.
10
Integration of prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV (PMTCT) postpartum services with other HIV care and treatment services within the maternal and child health setting in Zimbabwe, 2012.2012年,津巴布韦在母婴健康领域将预防母婴传播艾滋病毒(PMTCT)产后服务与其他艾滋病毒护理和治疗服务相结合。
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 10;9(6):e98236. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098236. eCollection 2014.

引用本文的文献

1
"We help people change harmful norms": Working with key opinion leaders to influence MNCH+N behaviors in Nigeria.“我们帮助人们改变有害规范”:与关键意见领袖合作,影响尼日利亚母婴健康和营养行为。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 15;19(8):e0308527. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308527. eCollection 2024.
2
Understanding communication in community engagement for maternal and newborn health programmes in low- and middle-income countries: a realist review.理解在中低收入国家母婴健康项目中的社区参与中的沟通:一个现实主义的综述。
Health Policy Plan. 2023 Oct 11;38(9):1079-1098. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czad078.
3
What's in a name? Unpacking 'Community ' terminology in reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health: a scoping review.

本文引用的文献

1
Reaching the poor with health interventions: programme-incidence analysis of seven randomised trials of women's groups to reduce newborn mortality in Asia and Africa.通过健康干预措施惠及贫困人口:对亚洲和非洲七项妇女团体降低新生儿死亡率随机试验的项目发生率分析
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016 Jan;70(1):31-41. doi: 10.1136/jech-2014-204685. Epub 2015 Aug 5.
2
Lessons learned from early implementation of option B+: the Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation experience in 11 African countries.从早期实施选项 B+中吸取的经验教训:伊丽莎白·格拉泽儿科艾滋病基金会在 11 个非洲国家的经验。
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2014 Dec 1;67 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S188-94. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000000372.
3
名称的含义是什么?生殖、孕产妇、新生儿和儿童健康领域中“社区”术语的解析:范围综述。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Feb;8(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009423.
4
A summative content analysis of how programmes to improve the right to sexual and reproductive health address power.对旨在改善性健康和生殖健康权利的方案如何处理权力问题的总结性内容分析。
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Apr;7(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-008438.
5
Exploring community support on safe motherhood: A case of Lilongwe District, Malawi.探讨母婴安全的社区支持:以马拉维利隆圭区为例。
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2021 Aug 3;13(1):e1-e7. doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v13i1.2907.
6
Project ACCLAIM: Intervention Effect on Community Knowledge, Attitudes and Beliefs of Maternal and Child Health and HIV/AIDS in Eswatini, Uganda and Zimbabwe.项目 ACCLAIM:在斯威士兰、乌干达和津巴布韦,干预对母婴健康和艾滋病毒/艾滋病的社区知识、态度和信念的影响。
AIDS Behav. 2021 Aug;25(8):2400-2409. doi: 10.1007/s10461-021-03202-2. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
7
Men's perspectives on male participation in antenatal care with their pregnant wives: a case of a military hospital in Lusaka, Zambia.男性对与怀孕妻子一起接受产前护理的看法:赞比亚卢萨卡一家军事医院的案例。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jul 8;19(1):463. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4294-8.
8
A study using knowledge, attitude and practices on the prevention of HIV-1 vertical transmission with outcomes in early infant HIV-1 diagnosis in Eastern Uganda.一项关于乌干达东部预防HIV-1垂直传播的知识、态度和实践与早期婴儿HIV-1诊断结果的研究。
J Virus Erad. 2019 Apr 1;5(2):102-108. doi: 10.1016/S2055-6640(20)30059-5.
9
Screening, management, and treatment of intimate partner violence among women in low-resource settings.资源匮乏地区女性亲密伴侣暴力的筛查、管理与治疗
Womens Health (Lond). 2018 Jan-Dec;14:1745506518766709. doi: 10.1177/1745506518766709.
10
Women's decision-making and uptake of services to prevent mother-to-child HIV transmission in Zambia.赞比亚妇女在预防母婴传播艾滋病毒方面的决策及服务利用情况。
AIDS Care. 2018 Apr;30(4):426-434. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2017.1381328. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
Role of community-level factors across the treatment cascade: a critical review.
社区层面因素在治疗流程中的作用:一项批判性综述。
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2014 Aug 15;66 Suppl 3:S311-8. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000000234.
4
Economic and social factors are some of the most common barriers preventing women from accessing maternal and newborn child health (MNCH) and prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) services: a literature review.经济和社会因素是阻碍妇女获得孕产妇和新生儿健康(MNCH)及预防母婴传播(PMTCT)服务的一些最常见障碍:一项文献综述。
AIDS Behav. 2014 Oct;18 Suppl 5:S516-30. doi: 10.1007/s10461-014-0756-5.
5
Home visits during pregnancy enhance male partner HIV counselling and testing in Kenya: a randomized clinical trial.孕期家访提高肯尼亚男性伴侣 HIV 咨询和检测:一项随机临床试验。
AIDS. 2014 Jan 2;28(1):95-103. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000000023.
6
Women's groups practising participatory learning and action to improve maternal and newborn health in low-resource settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.妇女组织开展参与式学习和行动,以改善资源匮乏环境中的孕产妇和新生儿健康:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2013 May 18;381(9879):1736-46. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60685-6.
7
Measuring HIV- and AIDS-related stigma and discrimination in Nicaragua: results from a community-based study.尼加拉瓜艾滋病毒和艾滋病相关耻辱感与歧视的测量:一项基于社区研究的结果
AIDS Educ Prev. 2013 Apr;25(2):164-78. doi: 10.1521/aeap.2013.25.2.164.
8
Male involvement and prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV in Sub-Saharan Africa: an integrative review.撒哈拉以南非洲地区男性参与及预防母婴传播艾滋病毒:一项综合综述
Curr HIV Res. 2013 Mar;11(2):169-77. doi: 10.2174/1570162x11311020009.
9
Operational issues and barriers to implementation of prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV (PMTCT) interventions in Sub-Saharan Africa.撒哈拉以南非洲地区预防母婴传播艾滋病毒(PMTCT)干预措施实施过程中的操作问题及障碍
Curr HIV Res. 2013 Mar;11(2):144-59. doi: 10.2174/1570162x11311020007.
10
When is a program ready for rigorous impact evaluation? The role of a falsifiable logic model.一个项目在什么时候可以进行严格的影响评估?可证伪逻辑模型的作用。
Eval Rev. 2012 Oct;36(5):375-401. doi: 10.1177/0193841X12474275.