Fedzechkina Maryia, Newport Elissa L, Jaeger T Florian
Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania.
Department of Neurology, Center for Brain Plasticity and Recovery, Georgetown University.
Cogn Sci. 2017 Mar;41(2):416-446. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12346. Epub 2016 Feb 22.
Across languages of the world, some grammatical patterns have been argued to be more common than expected by chance. These are sometimes referred to as (statistical) language universals. One such universal is the correlation between constituent order freedom and the presence of a case system in a language. Here, we explore whether this correlation can be explained by a bias to balance production effort and informativity of cues to grammatical function. Two groups of learners were presented with miniature artificial languages containing optional case marking and either flexible or fixed constituent order. Learners of the flexible order language used case marking significantly more often. This result parallels the typological correlation between constituent order flexibility and the presence of case marking in a language and provides a possible explanation for the historical development of Old English to Modern English, from flexible constituent order with case marking to relatively fixed order without case marking. In addition, learners of the flexible order language conditioned case marking on constituent order, using more case marking with the cross-linguistically less frequent order, again mirroring typological data. These results suggest that some cross-linguistic generalizations originate in functionally motivated biases operating during language learning.
在世界各种语言中,一些语法模式被认为比随机情况下预期的更为常见。这些有时被称为(统计)语言共性。其中一个共性是语言中成分顺序自由度与格系统的存在之间的相关性。在此,我们探讨这种相关性是否可以通过平衡表达努力和语法功能线索的信息量的倾向来解释。两组学习者被呈现包含可选格标记以及灵活或固定成分顺序的微型人工语言。灵活顺序语言的学习者使用格标记的频率明显更高。这一结果与语言中成分顺序灵活性和格标记的存在之间的类型学相关性相似,并为古英语到现代英语的历史发展提供了一种可能的解释,即从古英语具有格标记的灵活成分顺序到现代英语相对固定的无格标记顺序。此外,灵活顺序语言的学习者根据成分顺序来使用格标记,对于跨语言中较不常见的顺序使用更多的格标记,这再次反映了类型学数据。这些结果表明,一些跨语言的概括源于语言学习过程中起作用的功能驱动偏差。