Demers Anne-Marie, Venter Amour, Friedrich Sven O, Rojas-Ponce Gabriel, Mapamba Daniel, Jugheli Levan, Sasamalo Mohammed, Almeida Deepak, Dorasamy Afton, Jentsch Ute, Gibson Mara, Everitt Daniel, Eisenach Kathleen D, Diacon Andreas H
Molecular Biology and Human Genetics, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.
MRC Centre for Molecular and Cellular Biology, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.
J Clin Microbiol. 2016 May;54(5):1276-81. doi: 10.1128/JCM.03162-15. Epub 2016 Feb 24.
Pyrazinamide (PZA) is a key antituberculosis drug, yet no rapid susceptibility test is commercially available. PZA drug susceptibility testing (DST) was performed directly on sputum samples from 327 patients and compared with the indirect method by using the Bactec MGIT 960 system in the context of patient screening for participation in a drug trial. Compared to standard indirect PZA DST, direct DST was successful in only 59% of cases, but results obtained were highly accurate and available faster. Agreement between the direct and indirect methods varied from 90 to 100% in each laboratory. The median times for obtaining PZA results from the time when the specimen was collected ranged from 11 to 16 days for the direct test and 18 to 95 days for the indirect test across laboratories. The direct method is accurate and reproducible across laboratories. It can be expected to accelerate results in >50% of cases, but it cannot replace indirect DST for PZA. Phenotypic methods remain the gold standard for DST in drug trials. If future studies can optimize the method to decrease the number of uninterpretable results, direct MGIT DST could be the new phenotypic DST standard for clinical trials, providing more rapid detection of resistance to new drugs in experimental regimens.
吡嗪酰胺(PZA)是一种关键的抗结核药物,但尚无商业化的快速药敏试验。对327例患者的痰液样本直接进行了PZA药敏试验(DST),并在患者参与药物试验筛查的背景下,与使用Bactec MGIT 960系统的间接方法进行了比较。与标准间接PZA DST相比,直接DST仅在59%的病例中成功,但获得的结果高度准确且更快可得。每个实验室中直接法与间接法的一致性在90%至100%之间。各实验室从采集标本时起获得PZA结果的中位时间,直接检测为11至16天,间接检测为18至95天。直接法在各实验室中准确且可重复。预计在超过50%的病例中能加快结果得出,但它不能替代PZA的间接DST。表型方法仍然是药物试验中DST的金标准。如果未来的研究能够优化该方法以减少无法解释的结果数量,直接MGIT DST可能成为临床试验新的表型DST标准,从而在实验方案中更快地检测出对新药的耐药性。