Vilkaitė Laura
University of Nottingham.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016 Oct;42(10):1632-1642. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000259. Epub 2016 Feb 25.
Numerous studies have shown processing advantages for collocations, but they only investigated processing of adjacent collocations (e.g., provide information). However, in naturally occurring language, nonadjacent collocations (provide some of the information) are equally, if not more frequent. This raises the question whether the same kind of processing advantage holds for nonadjacent collocations as for adjacent ones. This paper reports on an eye-tracking experiment in which participants read sentences containing either adjacent or nonadjacent collocations or matched control phrases. The results replicated the finding that collocations are processed faster than control phrases, and extended this finding to nonadjacent collocations. However, the results also suggest that the facilitative effect might be larger for adjacent collocations than for nonadjacent ones. (PsycINFO Database Record
众多研究表明搭配具有加工优势,但这些研究仅考察了相邻搭配(如“提供信息”)的加工情况。然而,在自然语言中,非相邻搭配(如“提供一些信息”)即便出现频率不更高,至少也是同样常见的。这就引发了一个问题:非相邻搭配是否与相邻搭配一样具有相同类型的加工优势。本文报告了一项眼动追踪实验,实验中参与者阅读包含相邻或非相邻搭配或匹配控制短语的句子。研究结果重现了搭配比控制短语加工更快这一发现,并将这一发现扩展到了非相邻搭配。然而,结果也表明,相邻搭配的促进作用可能比非相邻搭配更大。(《心理学文摘数据库记录》 )