• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

谷歌搜索能预测精神活性物质的流行程度和危害吗?

Can Google Searches Predict the Popularity and Harm of Psychoactive Agents?

作者信息

Jankowski Wojciech, Hoffmann Marcin

机构信息

Faculty of Chemistry, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan, Poznan, Poland.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2016 Feb 25;18(2):e38. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4033.

DOI:10.2196/jmir.4033
PMID:26916984
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4786686/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Predicting the popularity of and harm caused by psychoactive agents is a serious problem that would be difficult to do by a single simple method. However, because of the growing number of drugs it is very important to provide a simple and fast tool for predicting some characteristics of these substances. We were inspired by the Google Flu Trends study on the activity of the influenza virus, which showed that influenza virus activity worldwide can be monitored based on queries entered into the Google search engine.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to propose a fast method for ranking the most popular and most harmful drugs based on easily available data gathered from the Internet.

METHODS

We used the Google search engine to acquire data for the ranking lists. Subsequently, using the resulting list and the frequency of hits for the respective psychoactive drugs combined with the word "harm" or "harmful", we estimated quickly how much harm is associated with each drug.

RESULTS

We ranked the most popular and harmful psychoactive drugs. As we conducted the research over a period of several months, we noted that the relative popularity indexes tended to change depending on when we obtained them. This suggests that the data may be useful in monitoring changes over time in the use of each of these psychoactive agents.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data correlate well with the results from a multicriteria decision analysis of drug harms in the United Kingdom. We showed that Google search data can be a valuable source of information to assess the popularity of and harm caused by psychoactive agents and may help in monitoring drug use trends.

摘要

背景

预测精神活性物质的受欢迎程度及其造成的危害是一个严重的问题,很难通过单一的简单方法来完成。然而,由于药物数量不断增加,提供一种简单快速的工具来预测这些物质的某些特性非常重要。我们受到谷歌流感趋势研究的启发,该研究表明,可以根据输入谷歌搜索引擎的查询来监测全球流感病毒的活动。

目的

我们的目的是提出一种基于从互联网收集的容易获得的数据,对最受欢迎和最有害药物进行排名的快速方法。

方法

我们使用谷歌搜索引擎获取排名列表的数据。随后,利用所得列表以及各种精神活性药物与“危害”或“有害”一词组合的搜索命中频率,我们快速估计了每种药物所关联的危害程度。

结果

我们对最受欢迎和最有害的精神活性药物进行了排名。在几个月的研究过程中,我们注意到相对受欢迎指数往往会根据获取时间的不同而变化。这表明这些数据可能有助于监测这些精神活性物质使用情况随时间的变化。

结论

我们的数据与英国药物危害多标准决策分析的结果相关性良好。我们表明,谷歌搜索数据可以成为评估精神活性物质的受欢迎程度及其造成的危害的宝贵信息来源,并可能有助于监测药物使用趋势。

相似文献

1
Can Google Searches Predict the Popularity and Harm of Psychoactive Agents?谷歌搜索能预测精神活性物质的流行程度和危害吗?
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Feb 25;18(2):e38. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4033.
2
Google Search Queries About Neurosurgical Topics: Are They a Suitable Guide for Neurosurgeons?关于神经外科主题的谷歌搜索查询:它们是神经外科医生的合适指南吗?
World Neurosurg. 2016 Jun;90:179-185. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.02.045. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
3
Tracking search engine queries for suicide in the United Kingdom, 2004-2013.2004年至2013年英国自杀相关搜索引擎查询记录追踪
Public Health. 2016 Aug;137:147-53. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2015.10.015. Epub 2016 Mar 11.
4
Using Google Flu Trends data in forecasting influenza-like-illness related ED visits in Omaha, Nebraska.利用谷歌流感趋势数据预测内布拉斯加州奥马哈市与流感样疾病相关的急诊就诊情况。
Am J Emerg Med. 2014 Sep;32(9):1016-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.05.052. Epub 2014 Jun 12.
5
The sources and popularity of online drug information: an analysis of top search engine results and web page views.在线药物信息的来源和流行度:对顶级搜索引擎结果和网页浏览量的分析。
Ann Pharmacother. 2011 Mar;45(3):350-6. doi: 10.1345/aph.1P572. Epub 2011 Feb 22.
6
Google search behavior for status epilepticus.癫痫持续状态的谷歌搜索行为。
Epilepsy Behav. 2015 Aug;49:146-9. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2015.02.029. Epub 2015 Apr 11.
7
Empowerment of Parents of Children With Craniosynostosis by Objective Scoring of Patient Information Websites.通过对患者信息网站进行客观评分增强颅缝早闭患儿家长的能力。
J Craniofac Surg. 2016 Jun;27(4):874-5. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000002623.
8
Global trends in the awareness of sepsis: insights from search engine data between 2012 and 2017.全球脓毒症意识趋势:2012 年至 2017 年搜索引擎数据的洞察。
Crit Care. 2018 Jan 17;22(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1914-8.
9
Using Internet Search Trends and Historical Trading Data for Predicting Stock Markets by the Least Squares Support Vector Regression Model.利用最小二乘支持向量回归模型通过互联网搜索趋势和历史交易数据预测股票市场。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2018 Jul 24;2018:6305246. doi: 10.1155/2018/6305246. eCollection 2018.
10
An Internet snapshot study to compare the international availability of the novel psychoactive substance methiopropamine.一项互联网快照研究比较新型精神活性物质甲硫苯丙胺的国际可得性。
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2014 Aug;52(7):678-81. doi: 10.3109/15563650.2014.933346.

引用本文的文献

1
Online Interest in Elf Bar in the United States: Google Health Trends Analysis.美国对 Elf Bar 的在线兴趣:谷歌健康趋势分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Nov 5;26:e50343. doi: 10.2196/50343.
2
Public interest in drug-related problems reflected in information search trends: an infodemiological study.公众对药物相关问题的关注反映在信息搜索趋势中:一项信息流行病学研究。
Daru. 2024 Dec;32(2):537-547. doi: 10.1007/s40199-024-00519-w. Epub 2024 Jun 18.
3
Social media and internet search data to inform drug utilization: A systematic scoping review.

本文引用的文献

1
Novel psychoactive substances in young adults with and without psychiatric comorbidities.有和没有精神疾病共病的年轻人中的新型精神活性物质。
Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:815424. doi: 10.1155/2014/815424. Epub 2014 Jul 15.
2
Novel psychoactive substances: a novel clinical challenge.新型精神活性物质:一项新的临床挑战。
BMJ Case Rep. 2013 Aug 20;2013:bcr2013200663. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2013-200663.
3
Young adults' recreational social environment as a predictor of ecstasy use initiation: findings of a population-based prospective study.
用于药物利用信息的社交媒体和互联网搜索数据:一项系统性综述。
Front Digit Health. 2023 Mar 20;5:1074961. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2023.1074961. eCollection 2023.
4
Quality and Accuracy of Information Available on Websites for Distracted Driving: Qualitative Analysis.分心驾驶相关网站上信息的质量与准确性:定性分析
Interact J Med Res. 2019 Dec 20;8(4):e16154. doi: 10.2196/16154.
5
Tracking Dabbing Using Search Query Surveillance: A Case Study in the United States.利用搜索查询监测追踪吸电子烟:美国的一个案例研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Sep 16;18(9):e252. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5802.
年轻人的娱乐社交环境对摇头丸使用起始的预测作用:一项基于人群的前瞻性研究结果。
Addiction. 2013 Oct;108(10):1809-17. doi: 10.1111/add.12239. Epub 2013 Jun 4.
4
Gender differences in the presence of drugs in violent deaths.暴力死亡中药物存在的性别差异。
Addiction. 2013 Mar;108(3):547-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012.04098.x. Epub 2012 Nov 1.
5
Use and abuse of alcohol and illicit drugs in US adolescents: results of the National Comorbidity Survey-Adolescent Supplement.美国青少年酒精和非法药物的使用与滥用:全国共病调查青少年补充调查结果
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2012 Apr;69(4):390-8. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.1503.
6
Is illicit drug use harmful to cognitive functioning in the midadult years? A cohort-based investigation.中年人滥用药物是否会损害认知功能?基于队列的研究。
Am J Epidemiol. 2012 Feb 1;175(3):218-27. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwr315. Epub 2011 Dec 21.
7
A damage/benefit evaluation of addictive product use.成瘾性产品使用的损害/获益评估。
Addiction. 2012 Feb;107(2):441-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03675.x.
8
Social anxiety and alcohol problems: the roles of perceived descriptive and injunctive peer norms.社交焦虑与酒精问题:感知到的描述性和规范性同伴规范的作用。
J Anxiety Disord. 2011 Jun;25(5):631-8. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2011.02.003. Epub 2011 Feb 13.
9
Drug harms in the UK: a multicriteria decision analysis.英国的药物危害:多准则决策分析。
Lancet. 2010 Nov 6;376(9752):1558-65. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61462-6. Epub 2010 Oct 29.
10
Detecting influenza epidemics using search engine query data.利用搜索引擎查询数据检测流感疫情。
Nature. 2009 Feb 19;457(7232):1012-4. doi: 10.1038/nature07634.