Marsch Lisa A, Moore Sarah K, Borodovsky Jacob T, Solhkhah Ramon, Badger Gary J, Semino Shelby, Jarrett Kate, Condon Kathleen DiGangi, Rossettie Kate, Vincent Phillip, Hajizadeh Neda, Ducat Elizabeth
Center for Technology and Behavioral Health, Dartmouth Psychiatric Research Center, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, USA.
Center for Comprehensive Pain Management and Palliative Care, Capital Health Medical Center, Pennington, NJ, USA.
Addiction. 2016 Aug;111(8):1406-15. doi: 10.1111/add.13363. Epub 2016 Apr 21.
Few randomized controlled trials have evaluated buprenorphine treatment interventions for opioid-dependent youth. Consequently, optimal administration strategies for this cohort are unclear. Our aim was to evaluate the relative efficacy of two different buprenorphine taper lengths in promoting abstinence from illicit opioids and treatment retention among opioid-dependent youth.
A double-blind, placebo controlled, multicenter randomized controlled trial.
Two hospital-based research clinics (Manhattan and Brooklyn) in New York City, USA from 2005 to 2010.
Volunteer sample of 53 primarily Caucasian participants between the ages of 16 and 24 (n = 11 under age 18) who met DSM-IV opioid dependence criteria.
Participants were assigned randomly to either a 28-day buprenorphine taper (n = 28) or 56-day buprenorphine taper (n = 25) via a parallel-groups design during a 63-day period. Both groups received behavioral counseling and opioid abstinence incentives. Both taper conditions had a minimum of 1 week of placebo dosing at the end of the taper.
The primary outcome was opioid abstinence measured as a percentage of scheduled urine toxicology tests documented to be negative for opioids. The secondary outcome was treatment retention, measured as number of days attended scheduled visits.
Intent-to-treat analyses revealed that participants who received a 56-day buprenorphine taper had a significantly higher percentage of opioid-negative scheduled urine tests compared with participants who received a 28-day buprenorphine taper [35 versus 17%, P = 0.039; Cohen's d = 0.57, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.02, 1.13]. Participants who received a 56-day buprenorphine taper were retained in treatment significantly longer than participants who received a 28-day buprenorphine taper (37.5 versus 26.4 days, P = 0.027; Cohen's d = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.06, 1.19). Daily attendance requirement was associated with decreased abstinence and shorter retention compared with a two to three times weekly attendance requirement, independent of taper duration. Follow-up data were insufficient to report.
Longer (56-day) buprenorphine taper produces better opioid abstinence and retention outcomes than shorter (28-day) buprenorphine taper for opioid-dependent youth.
很少有随机对照试验评估丁丙诺啡治疗对阿片类药物依赖青年的干预效果。因此,该人群的最佳给药策略尚不清楚。我们的目的是评估两种不同的丁丙诺啡减量时长在促进阿片类药物依赖青年戒除非法阿片类药物及维持治疗方面的相对疗效。
一项双盲、安慰剂对照、多中心随机对照试验。
2005年至2010年期间,美国纽约市的两家医院研究诊所(曼哈顿和布鲁克林)。
53名主要为白种人的志愿者样本,年龄在16至24岁之间(11名年龄在18岁以下),符合《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版阿片类药物依赖标准。
在63天的时间里,通过平行组设计将参与者随机分配至28天丁丙诺啡减量组(n = 28)或56天丁丙诺啡减量组(n = 25)。两组均接受行为咨询和阿片类药物戒除激励措施。两个减量组在减量结束时均至少有1周的安慰剂给药期。
主要结局指标为阿片类药物戒除情况,以记录的阿片类药物尿液毒理学检测呈阴性的预定检测次数的百分比来衡量。次要结局指标为治疗维持情况,以参加预定就诊的天数来衡量。
意向性分析显示,与接受28天丁丙诺啡减量的参与者相比,接受56天丁丙诺啡减量的参与者阿片类药物尿液检测呈阴性的预定检测次数百分比显著更高[35%对17%,P = 0.039;科恩d值 = 0.57,95%置信区间(CI)= 0.02,1.13]。接受56天丁丙诺啡减量的参与者维持治疗的时间显著长于接受28天丁丙诺啡减量者(37.5天对26.4天,P = 0.0