Suppr超能文献

吸食可卡因和不吸食可卡因的吸烟者对香烟线索的注意偏向

Cigarette Cue Attentional Bias in Cocaine-Smoking and Non-Cocaine-Using Cigarette Smokers.

作者信息

Marks Katherine R, Alcorn Joseph L, Stoops William W, Rush Craig R

机构信息

Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY;

Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY; Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky College of Arts and Sciences, Lexington, KY; Department of Psychiatry, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY.

出版信息

Nicotine Tob Res. 2016 Sep;18(9):1915-9. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntw026. Epub 2016 Feb 26.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Cigarette smoking in cocaine users is nearly four times higher than the national prevalence and cocaine use increases cigarette smoking. The mechanisms underlying cigarette smoking in cocaine-using individuals need to be identified to promote cigarette and cocaine abstinence. Previous studies have examined the salience of cigarette and cocaine cues separately. The present aim was to determine whether cigarette attentional bias (AB) is higher in cigarettes smokers who smoke cocaine relative to individuals who only smoke cigarettes.

METHODS

Twenty cigarette smokers who smoke cocaine and 20 non-cocaine-using cigarette smokers completed a visual probe task with eye-tracking technology. During this task, the magnitude of cigarette and cocaine AB was assessed through orienting bias, fixation time, and response time.

RESULTS

Cocaine users displayed an orienting bias towards cigarette cues. Cocaine users also endorsed a more urgent desire to smoke to relieve negative affect associated with cigarette craving than non-cocaine users (g = 0.6). Neither group displayed a cigarette AB, as measured by fixation time. Cocaine users, but not non-cocaine users, displayed a cocaine AB as measured by orienting bias (g = 2.0) and fixation time (g = 1.2). There were no significant effects for response time data.

CONCLUSIONS

Cocaine-smoking cigarettes smokers display an initial orienting bias toward cigarette cues, but not sustained cigarette AB. The incentive motivation underlying cigarette smoking also differs. Cocaine smokers report more urgent desire to smoke to relieve negative affect. Identifying differences in motivation to smoke cigarettes may provide new treatment targets for cigarette and cocaine use disorders.

IMPLICATIONS

These results suggest that cocaine-smoking cigarette smokers display an initial orienting bias towards cigarette cues, but not sustained attention towards cigarette cues, relative to non-cocaine-using smokers. Smoked cocaine users also report a more urgent desire to smoke to relieve negative affect than non-cocaine users. Identifying differences in motivation to smoke cigarettes may provide new treatment targets for both cigarette and cocaine use disorders.

摘要

引言

可卡因使用者中的吸烟率几乎是全国平均水平的四倍,并且使用可卡因会增加吸烟行为。需要确定可卡因使用者吸烟的潜在机制,以促进戒烟和戒除可卡因。先前的研究分别考察了香烟和可卡因线索的显著性。目前的目的是确定吸食可卡因的吸烟者相对于仅吸烟的个体,对香烟的注意偏向(AB)是否更高。

方法

20名吸食可卡因的吸烟者和20名不使用可卡因的吸烟者使用眼动追踪技术完成了一项视觉探测任务。在此任务中,通过定向偏向、注视时间和反应时间来评估对香烟和可卡因的AB程度。

结果

可卡因使用者对香烟线索表现出定向偏向。与不使用可卡因的使用者相比,可卡因使用者也更迫切地渴望通过吸烟来缓解与烟瘾相关的负面影响(g = 0.6)。以注视时间衡量,两组均未表现出对香烟的AB。以定向偏向(g = 2.0)和注视时间(g = 1.2)衡量,可卡因使用者表现出对可卡因的AB,而非可卡因使用者则未表现出。反应时间数据没有显著影响。

结论

吸食可卡因的吸烟者对香烟线索表现出初始定向偏向,但对香烟的AB不持续。吸烟背后的动机也有所不同。吸食可卡因的吸烟者报告称更迫切地渴望通过吸烟来缓解负面影响。识别吸烟动机的差异可能为吸烟和可卡因使用障碍提供新的治疗靶点。

启示

这些结果表明,与不使用可卡因的吸烟者相比,吸食可卡因的吸烟者对香烟线索表现出初始定向偏向,但对香烟线索的注意力不持续。吸食可卡因的使用者也比不使用可卡因的使用者更迫切地渴望通过吸烟来缓解负面影响。识别吸烟动机的差异可能为吸烟和可卡因使用障碍提供新的治疗靶点。

相似文献

6

引用本文的文献

7
The Attentional Bias in Current and Former Smokers.当前吸烟者和既往吸烟者的注意偏向。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2019 Jul 10;13:154. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00154. eCollection 2019.
8
Contribution of cocaine-related cues to concurrent monetary choice in humans.可卡因相关线索对人类同时进行货币选择的影响。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2018 Oct;235(10):2871-2881. doi: 10.1007/s00213-018-4978-5. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
9
An overview of alcohol and tobacco/nicotine interactions in the human laboratory.人体实验室中酒精与烟草/尼古丁相互作用概述。
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2017 Mar;43(2):186-196. doi: 10.1080/00952990.2016.1189927. Epub 2016 Jul 20.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验