Pham H T T, Antoine-Moussiaux N, Grosbois V, Moula N, Truong B D, Phan T D, Vu T D, Trinh T Q, Vu C C, Rukkwamsuk T, Peyre M
French Agricultural Research Center for International Development (CIRAD), Animal and Integrated Risk Management Research Unit (AGIRs), Montpellier, France.
Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2017 Aug;64(4):1168-1177. doi: 10.1111/tbed.12482. Epub 2016 Feb 29.
A study was conducted between May 2013 and August 2014 in three provinces of Vietnam to investigate financial impacts of swine diseases in pig holdings in 2010-2013. The aim of the study was to quantify the costs of swine diseases at producer level in order to understand swine disease priority for monitoring at local level. Financial impacts of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS), foot and mouth disease (FMD), and epidemic diarrhoea were assessed for 162 pig holders in two Red River Delta provinces and in one Mekong River Delta province, using data on pig production and swine disease outbreaks at farms. Losses incurred by swine diseases were estimated, including direct losses due to mortality (100% market value of pig before disease onset) and morbidity (abortion, delay of finishing stage), and indirect losses due to control costs (treatment, improving biosecurity and emergency vaccination) and revenue foregone (lower price in case of emergency selling). Financial impacts of swine diseases were expressed as percentage of gross margin of pig holding. The gross margin varied between pig farming groups (P < 0.0001) in the following order: large farm (USD 18 846), fattening farm (USD 7014) and smallholder (USD 2350). The losses per pig holding due to PRRS were the highest: 41% of gross margin for large farm, 38% for fattening farm and 63% for smallholder. Cost incurred by FMD was lower with 19%, 25% and 32% of gross margin of pig holding in large farm, fattening farm and smallholder, respectively. The cost of epidemic diarrhoea was the lowest compared to losses due to PRRS and FMD and accounted for around 10% of gross margin of pig holding in the three pig farming groups. These estimates provided critical elements on swine disease priorities to better inform surveillance and control at both national and local level.
2013年5月至2014年8月期间，在越南的三个省份开展了一项研究，以调查2010 - 2013年猪群中猪病的财务影响。该研究的目的是量化生产者层面猪病的成本，以便了解地方层面猪病监测的优先事项。利用农场的生猪生产和猪病爆发数据，对红河三角洲两个省份和湄公河三角洲一个省份的162名养猪户评估了猪繁殖与呼吸综合征（PRRS）、口蹄疫（FMD）和流行性腹泻的财务影响。估算了猪病造成的损失，包括因死亡（疾病发作前猪的100%市场价值）和发病（流产、育肥阶段延迟）导致的直接损失，以及因控制成本（治疗、改善生物安全和紧急接种疫苗）和收入损失（紧急销售时价格较低）导致的间接损失。猪病的财务影响以养猪场毛利润的百分比表示。毛利润在不同养猪群体之间存在差异（P < 0.0001），顺序如下：大型农场（18846美元）、育肥场（7014美元）和小农户（2350美元）。因PRRS导致的每个养猪场损失最高：大型农场为毛利润的41%，育肥场为38%，小农户为63%。口蹄疫造成的成本较低，大型农场、育肥场和小农户分别占养猪场毛利润的19%、25%和32%。与PRRS和口蹄疫造成的损失相比，流行性腹泻的成本最低，在三个养猪群体中约占养猪场毛利润的10%。这些估计为猪病优先事项提供了关键要素，以便更好地为国家和地方层面的监测和控制提供信息。
