Suppr超能文献

老年住院患者肌少症的病例发现:生物电阻抗分析与双能X线吸收法的性能比较

Case finding for sarcopenia in geriatric inpatients: performance of bioimpedance analysis in comparison to dual X-ray absorptiometry.

作者信息

Reiss Jens, Iglseder Bernhard, Kreutzer Martina, Weilbuchner Ingrid, Treschnitzer Wolfgang, Kässmann Helmut, Pirich Christian, Reiter Raphael

机构信息

Department of Geriatric Medicine, Christian-Doppler-Klinik, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Ignaz-Harrer-Straße 79, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.

Department of Clinical Nutrition, Christian-Doppler-Klinik, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Ignaz-Harrer-Straße 79, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.

出版信息

BMC Geriatr. 2016 Feb 29;16:52. doi: 10.1186/s12877-016-0228-z.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sarcopenia is a common geriatric syndrome associated with serious adverse health outcomes. The European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP) suggests different methods for case finding for sarcopenia. However, data comparing the different methodological options are scarce for geriatric inpatients.

METHODS

On the basis of the recommendations of the EWGSOP sixty geriatric inpatients underwent measurement of gait speed, hand grip strength and muscle mass by both, dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and bioimpedance analysis (BIA). By linear regression analysis and Bland-Altman plots muscle mass measurements of DXA and BIA were compared. Outcomes of the DXA- and BIA-based approaches for classifying participants as having normal or reduced muscle mass and sarcopenia according to the EWGSOP case finding algorithm were compared by raw agreement and kappa statistics. Finally, on the hypothetical assumption that the DXA-based approach can be set as reference, the performance of the BIA-based approach is illustrated.

RESULTS

Muscle mass measured by BIA was highly correlated to DXA (r > 0.9), but BIA systematically overestimated muscle mass. The mean difference between DXA and BIA was -1.30 kg (p < 0.001) for appendicular and -2.33 kg (p < 0.001) for total muscle mass. The raw agreement between the DXA- and BIA-based approaches for classifying participants as having normal or reduced muscle mass was at best 80 % depending on the BIA cut-offs used. Functional prescreening according to the sarcopenia case finding algorithm of the EWGSOP reduced the need for muscle mass measurement by 37 %, but only marginally changed the agreement between the DXA- and BIA-based approaches.

CONCLUSION

Clinicians should be aware that in geriatric inpatients the BIA-based approaches resulted in highly different subgroups of sarcopenic/non-sarcopenic subjects compared to the DXA-based approach following the EWGSOP case finding algorithm. In this pilot-study the BIA-based approach misclassified nearly 1 out of 6 patients if the DXA-based approach is taken as reference.

摘要

背景

肌肉减少症是一种常见的老年综合征,与严重的不良健康后果相关。欧洲老年人肌肉减少症工作组(EWGSOP)提出了不同的肌肉减少症病例发现方法。然而,关于老年住院患者不同方法选项比较的数据却很匮乏。

方法

根据EWGSOP的建议,60名老年住院患者接受了步态速度、握力和肌肉量的测量,测量方法包括双能X线吸收法(DXA)和生物电阻抗分析(BIA)。通过线性回归分析和Bland-Altman图比较了DXA和BIA的肌肉量测量结果。根据EWGSOP病例发现算法,比较了基于DXA和BIA的方法将参与者分类为肌肉量正常或减少以及肌肉减少症的结果,采用原始一致性和kappa统计量进行分析。最后,在假设基于DXA的方法可作为参考的情况下,阐述了基于BIA的方法的性能。

结果

BIA测量的肌肉量与DXA高度相关(r>0.9),但BIA系统性地高估了肌肉量。对于四肢肌肉量,DXA和BIA之间的平均差异为-1.30kg(p<0.001),对于总肌肉量,平均差异为-2.33kg(p<0.001)。根据所使用的BIA临界值,基于DXA和BIA的方法将参与者分类为肌肉量正常或减少的原始一致性最高为80%。根据EWGSOP肌肉减少症病例发现算法进行功能预筛查可减少37%的肌肉量测量需求,但仅略微改变了基于DXA和BIA的方法之间的一致性。

结论

临床医生应意识到,在老年住院患者中,根据EWGSOP病例发现算法,与基于DXA的方法相比,基于BIA的方法导致肌肉减少症/非肌肉减少症受试者的亚组差异很大。在这项初步研究中,如果以基于DXA的方法作为参考,基于BIA的方法将近六分之一的患者误分类。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f26c/4772647/53c69fa3a890/12877_2016_228_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验