• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于网络的干预措施MyPlan 1.0对就诊于全科诊所的成年人自我报告的水果和蔬菜摄入量的影响:一项准实验性试验。

Effect of the Web-Based Intervention MyPlan 1.0 on Self-Reported Fruit and Vegetable Intake in Adults Who Visit General Practice: A Quasi-Experimental Trial.

作者信息

Plaete Jolien, Crombez Geert, Van der Mispel Celien, Verloigne Maite, Van Stappen Vicky, De Bourdeaudhuij Ilse

机构信息

Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2016 Feb 29;18(2):e47. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5252.

DOI:10.2196/jmir.5252
PMID:26929095
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4791527/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Web-based interventions typically have small intervention effects on adults' health behavior because they primarily target processes leading to an intention to change leaving individuals in an intention-behavior gap, they often occur without contact with health care providers, and a limited amount of feedback is provided only at the beginning of these interventions, but not further on in the behavior change process. Therefore, we developed a Web-based intervention ("MyPlan 1.0") to promote healthy behavior in adults. The intervention was based on a self-regulation perspective that also targets postintentional processes and guides individuals during all phases of behavior change.

OBJECTIVE

The study investigated the effectiveness of MyPlan1.0 on fruit and vegetable intake of Flemish adults visiting general practice (3 groups: control group, intervention group recruited by researchers, and intervention group recruited and guided by general practitioners [GPs]). Second, it examined whether there was a larger intervention effect for the intervention group guided by GPs compared to the intervention group recruited by researchers.

METHODS

Adults (≥ 18 years) were recruited in 19 Flemish general practices. In each general practice, patients were systematically allocated by a researcher either for the intervention group (researchers' intervention group) or the waiting-list control group that received general advice. In a third group, the GP recruited adults for the intervention (GPs intervention group). The two intervention groups filled in evaluation questionnaires and received MyPlan 1.0 for a behavior of choice (fruit, vegetable, or physical activity). The waiting-list control group filled in the evaluation questionnaires and received only general information. Self-reported fruit and vegetable intake were assessed at baseline (T0), 1 week (T1), and 1 month (T2) postbaseline. Three-level (general practice, adults, time) linear regression models were conducted in MLwiN.

RESULTS

A total of 426 adults initially agreed to participate (control group: n=149; GPs' intervention group: n=41; researchers' intervention group: n=236). A high attrition rate was observed in both intervention groups (71.8%, 199/277) and in the control group (59.1%, 88/149). In comparison to no change in the control group, both the GPs' intervention group (fruit: χ(2)1=10.9, P=.004; vegetable: χ(2)1=5.3, P=.02) and the researchers' intervention group (fruit: χ(2)1=18.0, P=.001; vegetable: χ(2)1=12.8, P<.001) increased their intake of fruit and vegetables.

CONCLUSIONS

A greater increase in fruit and vegetable intake was found when the Web-based intervention MyPlan 1.0 was used compared to usual care of health promotion in general practice (ie, flyers with general information). However, further investigation on which (or combinations of which) behavior change techniques are effective, how to increase response rates, and the influence of delivery mode in routine practice is required.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02211040; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02211040 (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/6f8yxTRii).

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca48/4791527/016a5ba8a3c4/jmir_v18i2e47_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca48/4791527/f3518587799d/jmir_v18i2e47_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca48/4791527/84ea520065a2/jmir_v18i2e47_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca48/4791527/9f93601fdee5/jmir_v18i2e47_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca48/4791527/016a5ba8a3c4/jmir_v18i2e47_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca48/4791527/f3518587799d/jmir_v18i2e47_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca48/4791527/84ea520065a2/jmir_v18i2e47_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca48/4791527/9f93601fdee5/jmir_v18i2e47_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca48/4791527/016a5ba8a3c4/jmir_v18i2e47_fig4.jpg
摘要

背景

基于网络的干预措施通常对成年人的健康行为干预效果较小,因为它们主要针对导致改变意愿的过程,使个体处于意愿-行为差距中,这些干预通常在没有与医疗保健提供者接触的情况下进行,并且仅在这些干预开始时提供有限的反馈,而在行为改变过程的后续阶段则不再提供。因此,我们开发了一种基于网络的干预措施(“MyPlan 1.0”)来促进成年人的健康行为。该干预基于自我调节视角,也针对意向后过程,并在行为改变的所有阶段指导个体。

目的

本研究调查了MyPlan1.0对到全科医疗就诊的弗拉芒成年人水果和蔬菜摄入量的有效性(3组:对照组、由研究人员招募的干预组以及由全科医生招募和指导的干预组)。其次,研究了与由研究人员招募的干预组相比,由全科医生指导的干预组是否有更大的干预效果。

方法

在19家弗拉芒全科医疗机构招募了成年人(≥18岁)。在每家全科医疗机构中,研究人员将患者系统地分配到干预组(研究人员干预组)或接受一般建议的等待名单对照组。在第三组中,全科医生招募成年人参与干预(全科医生干预组)。两个干预组填写评估问卷,并针对选择的一种行为(水果、蔬菜或体育活动)接受MyPlan 1.0。等待名单对照组填写评估问卷,仅接收一般信息。在基线(T0)、基线后1周(T1)和1个月(T2)评估自我报告的水果和蔬菜摄入量。在MLwiN中进行三级(全科医疗机构、成年人、时间)线性回归模型分析。

结果

共有426名成年人最初同意参与(对照组:n = 149;全科医生干预组:n = 41;研究人员干预组:n = 236)。两个干预组(71.8%,199/277)和对照组(59.1%,88/149)均观察到高失访率。与对照组无变化相比,全科医生干预组(水果:χ(2)1 = 10.9,P = 0.004;蔬菜:χ(2)1 = 5.3,P = 0.02)和研究人员干预组(水果:χ(2)1 = 18.0,P = 0.001;蔬菜:χ(2)1 = 12.8,P < 0.001)的水果和蔬菜摄入量均有所增加。

结论

与全科医疗中通常的健康促进护理(即提供一般信息的传单)相比,使用基于网络的干预措施MyPlan 1.0时,水果和蔬菜摄入量有更大的增加。然而,需要进一步研究哪些行为改变技术(或哪些技术的组合)是有效的、如何提高应答率以及在常规实践中交付模式的影响。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02211040;https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02211040(由WebCite®存档于http://www.webcitation.org/6f8yxTRii)。

相似文献

1
Effect of the Web-Based Intervention MyPlan 1.0 on Self-Reported Fruit and Vegetable Intake in Adults Who Visit General Practice: A Quasi-Experimental Trial.基于网络的干预措施MyPlan 1.0对就诊于全科诊所的成年人自我报告的水果和蔬菜摄入量的影响:一项准实验性试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Feb 29;18(2):e47. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5252.
2
Effectiveness of a Web-Based Computer-Tailored Multiple-Lifestyle Intervention for People Interested in Reducing their Cardiovascular Risk: A Randomized Controlled Trial.基于网络的计算机定制多生活方式干预对有兴趣降低心血管风险人群的有效性:一项随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Apr 11;18(4):e78. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5147.
3
Web-Based Intervention for Physical Activity and Fruit and Vegetable Intake Among Chinese University Students: A Randomized Controlled Trial.针对中国大学生身体活动及水果和蔬菜摄入量的基于网络的干预措施:一项随机对照试验
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Apr 10;19(4):e106. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7152.
4
Short- and medium-term efficacy of a Web-based computer-tailored nutrition education intervention for adults including cognitive and environmental feedback: randomized controlled trial.一项针对成年人的基于网络的计算机定制营养教育干预措施的短期和中期效果,包括认知和环境反馈:随机对照试验
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jan 19;17(1):e23. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3837.
5
The Effect of the eHealth Intervention 'MyPlan 1.0' on Physical Activity in Adults Who Visit General Practice: A Quasi-Experimental Trial.电子健康干预措施“MyPlan 1.0”对到普通科就诊的成年人身体活动的影响:一项准实验性试验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jan 30;15(2):228. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15020228.
6
Results of MyPlan 2.0 on Physical Activity in Older Belgian Adults: Randomized Controlled Trial.MyPlan 2.0对比利时老年成年人身体活动影响的研究结果:随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Oct 7;21(10):e13219. doi: 10.2196/13219.
7
Effectiveness of a web-based, computer-tailored, pedometer-based physical activity intervention for adults: a cluster randomized controlled trial.一项针对成年人的基于网络、计算机定制、计步器的体育活动干预措施的效果:一项整群随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Feb 9;17(2):e38. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3402.
8
Long-term efficacy of a Web-based computer-tailored nutrition education intervention for adults including cognitive and environmental feedback: a randomized controlled trial.一项针对成年人的基于网络的计算机定制营养教育干预措施的长期效果研究,包括认知和环境反馈:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Apr 12;15:372. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1707-4.
9
A Self-Regulation-Based eHealth Intervention to Promote a Healthy Lifestyle: Investigating User and Website Characteristics Related to Attrition.一种基于自我调节的电子健康干预措施以促进健康生活方式:调查与损耗相关的用户和网站特征。
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jul 11;19(7):e241. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7277.
10
Efficacy and External Validity of Electronic and Mobile Phone-Based Interventions Promoting Vegetable Intake in Young Adults: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.基于电子设备和手机的干预措施对促进年轻人蔬菜摄入量的效果及外部效度:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Apr 8;18(4):e58. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5082.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Demographic Characteristics and Personality Traits on Eating Patterns in the Context of Dietary Intervention: The EATMED Case Study.人口统计学特征和人格特质在饮食干预背景下对饮食模式的影响:EATMED案例研究
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Jul 10;22(7):1095. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22071095.
2
Framework Development for Reducing Attrition in Digital Dietary Interventions: Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis.框架开发以减少数字饮食干预中的流失:系统评价和主题综合。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 27;26:e58735. doi: 10.2196/58735.
3
Digital Health Promotion and Prevention in Settings: Scoping Review.

本文引用的文献

1
A Self-Regulation eHealth Intervention to Increase Healthy Behavior Through General Practice: Protocol and Systematic Development.一项通过全科医疗促进健康行为的自我调节电子健康干预措施:方案与系统开发
JMIR Res Protoc. 2015 Dec 22;4(4):e141. doi: 10.2196/resprot.4835.
2
Effect of nutrition care provided by primary health professionals on adults' dietary behaviours: a systematic review.初级卫生专业人员提供的营养护理对成年人饮食行为的影响:一项系统综述。
Fam Pract. 2015 Dec;32(6):605-17. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmv067. Epub 2015 Aug 19.
3
What do general practitioners think about an online self-regulation programme for health promotion? Focus group interviews.
数字健康促进和预防措施在特定环境中的应用:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jan 28;24(1):e21063. doi: 10.2196/21063.
4
Trends in the Number of Behavioural Theory-Based Healthy Eating Interventions Inclusive of Dietitians/Nutritionists in 2000-2020.2000-2020 年包含营养师/营养学家的基于行为理论的健康饮食干预数量的变化趋势。
Nutrients. 2021 Nov 20;13(11):4161. doi: 10.3390/nu13114161.
5
Effectiveness of the mHealth intervention 'MyDayPlan' to increase physical activity: an aggregated single case approach.移动健康干预措施“MyDayPlan”对增加身体活动的有效性:聚合的单一案例方法。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Jul 7;18(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01163-2.
6
Which behaviour change techniques are effective to promote physical activity and reduce sedentary behaviour in adults: a factorial randomized trial of an e- and m-health intervention.哪种行为改变技术可有效促进成年人的身体活动和减少久坐行为:电子和移动健康干预的析因随机试验。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Oct 7;17(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-01001-x.
7
Acceptability and feasibility of the mHealth intervention 'MyDayPlan' to increase physical activity in a general adult population.接受度和可行性的移动医疗干预措施 'MyDayPlan' 以增加一般成年人群的身体活动。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jun 29;20(1):1032. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09148-9.
8
Global Vegetable Intake and Supply Compared to Recommendations: A Systematic Review.全球蔬菜摄入量与供应量与推荐量相比:系统评价。
Nutrients. 2020 May 27;12(6):1558. doi: 10.3390/nu12061558.
9
Efficacy of a Self-Regulation-Based Electronic and Mobile Health Intervention Targeting an Active Lifestyle in Adults Having Type 2 Diabetes and in Adults Aged 50 Years or Older: Two Randomized Controlled Trials.一项针对2型糖尿病成年人及50岁及以上成年人积极生活方式的基于自我调节的电子和移动健康干预措施的效果:两项随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Aug 2;21(8):e13363. doi: 10.2196/13363.
10
A factorial randomised controlled trial to identify efficacious self-regulation techniques in an e- and m-health intervention to target an active lifestyle: study protocol.一项基于因子设计的随机对照试验,旨在确定电子和移动健康干预措施中针对积极生活方式的自我调节技术的有效性:研究方案。
Trials. 2019 Jun 10;20(1):340. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3456-7.
全科医生对健康促进的在线自我调节计划有何看法?焦点小组访谈。
BMC Fam Pract. 2015 Jan 22;16:3. doi: 10.1186/s12875-014-0214-5.
4
Association of behaviour change techniques with effectiveness of dietary interventions among adults of retirement age: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.行为改变技术与退休年龄成年人饮食干预效果的关联:随机对照试验的系统评价与荟萃分析
BMC Med. 2014 Oct 7;12:177. doi: 10.1186/s12916-014-0177-3.
5
Randomized controlled trial of a computer-tailored multiple health behaviour intervention in general practice: 12-month follow-up results.随机对照试验在一般实践中的计算机定制的多种健康行为干预:12 个月随访结果。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014 Mar 19;11(1):41. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-11-41.
6
Effectiveness of interventions to promote healthy diet in primary care: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.干预措施在初级保健中促进健康饮食的有效性:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Public Health. 2013 Dec 20;13:1203. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-1203.
7
Improving diet, physical activity and other lifestyle behaviours using computer-tailored advice in general practice: a randomised controlled trial.在全科医疗中使用计算机量身定制建议来改善饮食、身体活动和其他生活方式行为:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012 Sep 11;9:108. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-9-108.
8
A systematic review of randomized controlled trials on the effectiveness of computer-tailored physical activity and dietary behavior promotion programs: an update.系统评价随机对照试验中计算机定制的体育活动和饮食行为促进计划的有效性:更新。
Ann Behav Med. 2012 Oct;44(2):259-86. doi: 10.1007/s12160-012-9384-3.
9
Critical review: vegetables and fruit in the prevention of chronic diseases.**综述**:蔬菜和水果在慢性病预防中的作用。
Eur J Nutr. 2012 Sep;51(6):637-63. doi: 10.1007/s00394-012-0380-y. Epub 2012 Jun 9.
10
Adoption, reach and effectiveness of computer-based, practitioner delivered and combined smoking interventions in general medical practices: a three-arm cluster randomized trial.基于计算机的、由从业者提供的以及结合使用的吸烟干预措施在一般医疗实践中的采用、覆盖范围和效果:一项三臂整群随机试验。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2012 Feb 1;121(1-2):124-32. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.08.019. Epub 2011 Sep 15.