Longo Nicola, Imbimbo Ciro, Fusco Ferdinando, Ficarra Vincenzo, Mangiapia Francesco, Di Lorenzo Giuseppe, Creta Massimiliano, Imperatore Vittorio, Mirone Vincenzo
Department of Neurosciences, Sciences of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy.
Urology Department, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.
BJU Int. 2016 Oct;118(4):521-6. doi: 10.1111/bju.13462. Epub 2016 Apr 4.
To compare peri-operative outcomes and quality of life (QoL) in a series of elderly patients with high comorbidity status who underwent single stoma cutaneous ureterostomy (CU) or ileal conduit (IC) after radical cystectomy (RC).
The clinical records of patients aged >75 years with an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score >2 who underwent RC at a single institution between March 2009 and March 2014 were retrospectively analysed. After RC, all patients included in the study received an IC urinary diversion or a CU with single stoma urinary diversion. Preoperative clinical characteristics as well as intra- and postoperative outcomes were evaluated and compared between the two groups. In addition, the Bladder Cancer Index (BCI) was used to assess QoL.
A total of 70 patients were included in the final comparative analyses. Of these, 35 underwent IC diversion and 35 CU single stoma diversion. The two groups were similar with regard to age, gender, ASA score, type of indication and pathological features. Operating times (P < 0.001), estimated blood loss (P < 0.001), need for intensive care unit stay (P = 0.01), time to drain removal (P < 0.001) and length of hospital stay (P < 0.001) were significantly higher in patients undergoing IC diversion. The number of patients with intra- (P = 0.04) and early postoperative (P = 0.02) complications was also significantly higher among those undergoing IC diversion. Interestingly, the mean BCI scores were overlapping in the two groups.
The present results show that CU with a single stoma can represent a valid alternative to IC in elderly patients with relevant comorbidities, reducing peri-operative complications without a significant impairment of QoL.
比较一系列合并症多的老年患者在根治性膀胱切除术后接受单口皮肤输尿管造口术(CU)或回肠膀胱术(IC)的围手术期结局和生活质量(QoL)。
回顾性分析2009年3月至2014年3月间在单一机构接受根治性膀胱切除术、年龄>75岁且美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分>2的患者的临床记录。根治性膀胱切除术后,纳入研究的所有患者均接受IC尿流改道术或单口CU尿流改道术。评估并比较两组患者的术前临床特征以及术中和术后结局。此外,使用膀胱癌指数(BCI)评估生活质量。
最终比较分析共纳入70例患者。其中,35例行IC尿流改道术,35例行CU单口尿流改道术。两组在年龄、性别、ASA评分、适应证类型和病理特征方面相似。接受IC尿流改道术的患者手术时间(P<0.001)、估计失血量(P<0.001)、入住重症监护病房的需求(P=0.01)、引流管拔除时间(P<0.001)和住院时间(P<0.001)显著更长。接受IC尿流改道术的患者术中(P=0.04)和术后早期(P=0.02)并发症的发生率也显著更高。有趣的是,两组的平均BCI评分重叠。
目前结果表明,对于有相关合并症的老年患者,单口CU可作为IC的有效替代方案,减少围手术期并发症,且不会显著损害生活质量。