Suppr超能文献

巨细胞动脉炎组织学模式的描述与验证以及炎症浸润动态模型的提出

Description and Validation of Histological Patterns and Proposal of a Dynamic Model of Inflammatory Infiltration in Giant-cell Arteritis.

作者信息

Hernández-Rodríguez José, Murgia Giuseppe, Villar Irama, Campo Elías, Mackie Sarah L, Chakrabarty Aruna, Hensor Elizabeth M A, Morgan Ann W, Font Carme, Prieto-González Sergio, Espígol-Frigolé Georgina, Grau Josep M, Cid Maria C

机构信息

From the Vasculitis Research Unit, Department of Autoimmune Diseases (JHR, GM, IV, CF, SPG, GEF, MCC); Department of Anatomic Pathology, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain (EC); Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds and NIHR Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust (SLM, EMAH, AWM); Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK (AC); Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain (JMG).

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Feb;95(8):e2368. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002368.

Abstract

The extent of inflammatory infiltrates in arteries from patients with giant-cell arteritis (GCA) have been described using different terms and definitions. Studies investigating the relationship between GCA histological features and clinical manifestations have produced controversial results. The aims of this study were to characterize and validate histological patterns in temporal artery biopsies (TABs) from GCA patients, to explore additional histological features, including the coexistence of different patterns, and also to investigate the relationship of the inflammatory patterns with clinical and laboratory features.We performed histological examination of TAB from patients with GCA consecutively diagnosed between 1992 and 2012. Patterns of inflammation were defined according to the extent and distribution of inflammatory infiltrates within the artery. Clinical and laboratory variables were recorded. Two external investigators underwent a focused, one-day training session and then independently scored 77 cases. Quadratic-weighted kappa was calculated.TAB from 285 patients (200 female/85 male) were evaluated. Four histological inflammatory patterns were distinguished: 1 - adventitial (n = 16); 2 - adventitial invasive: adventitial involvement with some extension to the muscular layer (n = 21); 3 - concentric bilayer: adventitial and intimal involvement with media layer preservation (n = 52); and 4 - panarteritic (n = 196). Skip lesions were observed in 10% and coexistence of various patterns in 43%. Raw agreement of each external scorer with the gold-standard was 82% and 77% (55% and 46% agreement expected from chance); kappa = 0.82 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70-0.95) and 0.79 (95% CI 0.68-0.91). Although abnormalities on temporal artery palpation and the presence of jaw claudication and scalp tenderness tended to occur more frequently in patients with arteries depicting more extensive inflammation, no statistically significant correlations were found between histological patterns and clinical features or laboratory findings.In conclusion, we have described and validated 4 histological patterns. The presence of different coexisting patterns likely reflects sequential steps in the progression of inflammation and injury. No clear relationship was found between these patterns and clinical or laboratory findings. However, several cranial manifestations tended to occur more often in patients with temporal arteries exhibiting panarteritic inflammation. This validated score system may be useful to standardize stratification of histological severity for immunopathology biomarker studies or correlation with imaging.

摘要

巨细胞动脉炎(GCA)患者动脉中的炎症浸润程度已有不同的描述术语和定义。研究GCA组织学特征与临床表现之间关系的结果存在争议。本研究的目的是对GCA患者颞动脉活检(TAB)的组织学模式进行特征描述和验证,探索额外的组织学特征(包括不同模式共存),并研究炎症模式与临床及实验室特征之间的关系。

我们对1992年至2012年间连续诊断为GCA的患者的TAB进行了组织学检查。根据动脉内炎症浸润的程度和分布来定义炎症模式。记录临床和实验室变量。两名外部研究人员参加了为期一天的集中培训,然后独立对77例病例进行评分。计算二次加权kappa值。

对285例患者(200例女性/85例男性)的TAB进行了评估。区分出四种组织学炎症模式:1 - 外膜型(n = 16);2 - 外膜浸润型:外膜受累并向肌层有一定延伸(n = 21);3 - 同心双层型:外膜和内膜受累,中膜层保留(n = 52);4 - 全动脉炎型(n = 196)。10%观察到跳跃性病变,43%观察到不同模式共存。每位外部评分者与金标准的原始一致性分别为82%和77%(预期偶然一致性分别为55%和46%);kappa值分别为0.82(95%置信区间[CI] 0.70 - 0.95)和0.79(95% CI 0.68 - 0.91)。尽管颞动脉触诊异常、颌跛行和头皮压痛在炎症更广泛的动脉患者中往往更频繁出现,但组织学模式与临床特征或实验室检查结果之间未发现统计学上的显著相关性。

总之,我们描述并验证了4种组织学模式。不同共存模式的存在可能反映了炎症和损伤进展中的连续步骤。这些模式与临床或实验室检查结果之间未发现明确关系。然而,在颞动脉表现为全动脉炎炎症的患者中,几种颅部表现往往更常出现。这种经过验证的评分系统可能有助于标准化免疫病理学生物标志物研究或与影像学相关性研究中的组织学严重程度分层。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f43b/4778989/e911b3e7d804/medi-95-e2368-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验