Bateganya M H, Sileo K M, Wanyenze R K, Kiene S M
Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Graduate School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA.
Public Health. 2016 Jun;135:3-13. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2016.01.011. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
Many population-based demographic surveys assess local and national HIV prevalence in developing countries through home-based HIV testing and counselling (HBHTC), but results are rarely returned to participants. This review gathered evidence on the feasibility and best practices of providing HIV test results during such surveys by reviewing population-based surveys that provided test results.
Literature review.
This review was conducted as part of a broader literature review related to HBHTC. We present results from population-based HIV seroprevalence surveys conducted between January 1984 and June 2013.
We identified eighteen population-based surveys describing uptake of results when testing or results were offered in the home, four of which compare home uptake to facility-based testing. All were from Sub-Saharan Africa. More people tested and received results in HBHTC compared to facility-based testing. Uptake of test results (72%) and the percentage of the population tested (59%) was highest when testing and the provision of results were provided in the home compared to the provision of results elsewhere (41% uptake; 37% population coverage), as well as mobile/facility-based testing and the provision of results (15% uptake; 13% population coverage). Providing results the same day as testing in HBHTC produces higher uptake (97% uptake; 74% population coverage) than delayed results.
Inclusion of home testing and provision of HIV results to participants in national population-based surveys in Sub-Saharan Africa is possible and should be prioritized. The timing and location of testing and the provision of results during HBHTC as part of population-based surveys affects uptake of testing and population coverage.
许多基于人群的人口统计调查通过居家艾滋病毒检测与咨询(HBHTC)来评估发展中国家当地和全国的艾滋病毒流行情况,但检测结果很少反馈给参与者。本综述通过回顾提供检测结果的基于人群的调查,收集了在此类调查期间提供艾滋病毒检测结果的可行性和最佳实践的证据。
文献综述。
本综述是与HBHTC相关的更广泛文献综述的一部分。我们展示了1984年1月至2013年6月期间进行的基于人群的艾滋病毒血清流行率调查的结果。
我们确定了18项基于人群的调查,这些调查描述了在家中进行检测或提供检测结果时结果的接受情况,其中4项将在家中接受检测的情况与基于机构的检测进行了比较。所有调查均来自撒哈拉以南非洲。与基于机构的检测相比,接受HBHTC检测并获得结果的人更多。与在其他地方提供检测结果(结果接受率41%;人群覆盖率37%)以及移动/机构检测并提供结果(结果接受率15%;人群覆盖率13%)相比,在家中进行检测并提供结果时,检测结果的接受率(72%)和接受检测的人群比例(59%)最高。在HBHTC中,与延迟提供结果相比,在检测当天提供结果会产生更高的接受率(结果接受率97%;人群覆盖率74%)。
在撒哈拉以南非洲的全国性基于人群的调查中,纳入居家检测并向参与者提供艾滋病毒检测结果是可行的,应优先考虑。作为基于人群的调查的一部分,在HBHTC期间检测和提供结果的时间和地点会影响检测的接受率和人群覆盖率。