Suppr超能文献

中药与西药联合应用对心肺复苏后患者死亡率的影响:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和Meta分析

Effect of Combination of Chinese Herbal Medicine versus Western Medicine on Mortality in Patients after Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

作者信息

Guo Wenxiu, Lu Xiaoguang, Wang Dalong, Chen Tuo, Fan Zhiwei, Song Yi

机构信息

Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116044, China.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University, Dalian 116001, China.

出版信息

Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2016;2016:3506757. doi: 10.1155/2016/3506757. Epub 2016 Feb 3.

Abstract

Introduction. Although Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) treatment combined with conventional western therapy has been widely used and reported in many clinical trials in China, there is uncertainty about the efficacy of this combination in the treatment of patients after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). This systematic review aimed to assess whether the risk of mortality has decreased comparing the combination of CHM treatment with conventional western therapy. Methods. To identify relevant studies, the literature search was conducted in Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, CBM, CNKI, VIP, and Wanfang database. We included all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared outcomes of patients after CPR taking combination of CHM treatment with those taking just conventional western therapy. Results. This meta-analysis showed that patients randomly assigned to combined CHM treatment group had a statistically significant 23% reduction in mortality compared with those randomly assigned to conventional western therapy group (RR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.70-0.84). Conclusions. This meta-analysis provides evidence suggesting that a combined CHM therapy is associated with a decreased risk of mortality compared with conventional western therapy in patients after CPR. Further studies are needed to provide more evidence to prove or refute our conclusion and identify reasons for the reduction of mortality.

摘要

引言。尽管中草药(CHM)治疗联合传统西医治疗已在中国的许多临床试验中广泛应用并被报道,但这种联合治疗在心肺复苏(CPR)后患者治疗中的疗效尚不确定。本系统评价旨在评估与单纯传统西医治疗相比,CHM治疗联合传统西医治疗是否降低了死亡率风险。方法。为识别相关研究,我们在Medline、Embase、Cochrane图书馆、中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)、中国知网(CNKI)、维普资讯(VIP)和万方数据库中进行了文献检索。我们纳入了所有比较接受CHM治疗联合传统西医治疗与仅接受传统西医治疗的CPR后患者结局的随机对照试验(RCT)。结果。该荟萃分析表明,随机分配至CHM治疗联合组的患者与随机分配至传统西医治疗组的患者相比,死亡率有统计学意义地降低了23%(风险比:0.77;95%置信区间:0.70 - 0.84)。结论。该荟萃分析提供的证据表明,与传统西医治疗相比,CHM联合治疗与CPR后患者死亡率风险降低相关。需要进一步研究以提供更多证据来证实或反驳我们的结论,并确定死亡率降低的原因。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d613/4756138/3517e338f0c6/ECAM2016-3506757.001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验