Suppr超能文献

内镜时代Zenker憩室的演变管理:北美经验

Evolving Management of Zenker's Diverticulum in the Endoscopic Era: A North American Experience.

作者信息

Jones Daniel, Aloraini Abdullah, Gowing Stephen, Cools-Lartigue Jonathan, Leimanis Mara, Tabah Roger, Ferri Lorenzo

机构信息

Division of Thoracic, McGill University, Montreal General Hospital, Room L9-112, 1650 Cedar Avenue, Montreal, QC, H3A 1G4, Canada.

Division of General Surgery, McGill University, Montreal General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.

出版信息

World J Surg. 2016 Jun;40(6):1390-6. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3442-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Open surgical cricopharyngeal myotomy(CM) is considered standard of care for Zenker's diverticulum(ZD). Trans-oral CM has been described using a rigid stapling device for two decades; however, this remains problematic for severely kyphotic patients. This problem can be overcome with flexible endoscopy utilizing an electrosurgical needle knife. We sought to compare clinical outcomes between these techniques to stratify patient selection.

METHODS

Patients undergoing ZD treatment from 1992 to 2015 were reviewed. Demographics, diverticulum size, post-operative complications, and length of stay (LOS) were compared between open cricopharyngeal myotomy (OpenCM), rigid trans-oral stapling myotomy (RigidCM), and flexible endoscopic myotomy (FlexCM). Dysphagia scores (DS, 0:best-4:worst) and pneumonia incidence were assessed pre-operatively and post-operatively.

RESULTS

62 patients underwent OpenCM (39/62(63 %)) or endoscopic CM (23/62(37 %) (8 RigidCM/15 FlexCM)). CM significantly reduced dysphagia for all approaches [OpenCM:2(2-3)-0(0-0); RigidCM:2(2-2)-0(0-0); FlexCM:3(3-3)-0(0-0)]. FlexCM patients had significantly worse pre-operative DS. Endoscopic CM was attempted and completed in 23/35(66 %) patients. Reasons for OpenCM conversion included inability to position the diverticular retractor due to patient body habitus (RigidCM), and the inability to position the overtube due to small ZD (FlexCM). Major post-operative complications were rare and similar in all groups. Medium-to-long-term post-myotomy pneumonia was comparable between groups. LOS (days) was reduced for FlexCM (1(1-2)) versus RigidCM (3(2-6)) and OpenCM (4(3-7)).

CONCLUSIONS

CM is highly effective for treating ZD. Open and endoscopic approaches offer comparable outcomes and dysphagia resolution. FlexCM is efficacious for large ZD and can be performed in most patients irrespective of body habitus. FlexCM represents an excellent approach for large ZD, while OpenCM should be reserved for small ZD for which an overtube cannot be positioned.

摘要

背景

开放性手术环咽肌切开术(CM)被认为是治疗Zenker憩室(ZD)的标准治疗方法。经口CM使用刚性吻合器已有二十年;然而,对于严重驼背患者,这仍然存在问题。使用电外科针刀的柔性内镜可以克服这个问题。我们试图比较这些技术之间的临床结果,以便分层选择患者。

方法

回顾了1992年至2015年接受ZD治疗的患者。比较了开放性环咽肌切开术(OpenCM)、刚性经口吻合器肌切开术(RigidCM)和柔性内镜肌切开术(FlexCM)之间的人口统计学、憩室大小、术后并发症和住院时间(LOS)。术前和术后评估吞咽困难评分(DS,0:最佳-4:最差)和肺炎发生率。

结果

62例患者接受了OpenCM(39/62(63%))或内镜CM(23/62(37%)(8例RigidCM/15例FlexCM))。CM对所有方法均显著降低了吞咽困难[OpenCM:2(2-3)-0(0-0);RigidCM:2(2-2)-0(0-0);FlexCM:3(3-3)-0(0-0)]。FlexCM患者术前DS明显更差。23/35(66%)例患者尝试并完成了内镜CM。OpenCM转换的原因包括由于患者体型无法放置憩室牵开器(RigidCM),以及由于ZD小无法放置外套管(FlexCM)。主要术后并发症罕见,且在所有组中相似。肌切开术后中至长期肺炎在各组之间相当。FlexCM的住院时间(天)减少(1(1-2)),而RigidCM为(3(2-6)),OpenCM为(4(

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验