Suppr超能文献

经口Zenker 憩室治疗: 软式内镜与内镜缝合器。 结局的回顾性比较。

Transoral treatment of Zenker diverticulum: flexible endoscopy versus endoscopic stapling. A retrospective comparison of outcomes.

机构信息

Gastroenterology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Rozzano, Italy.

出版信息

Dis Esophagus. 2011 May;24(4):235-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2010.01143.x. Epub 2010 Dec 10.

Abstract

Transoral stapled diverticulo-esophagostomy (TSDE) has gained increased popularity in surgical treatment of Zenker diverticulum (ZD). One of the advantages of this approach is early rehabilitation with significant decrease in patient morbidity and time to resumption of oral intake as compared with open treatment. The section of the septum between the diverticulum and the esophagus with a flexible endoscopic (ES) approach has also been proposed since mid-90s as an alternative for treatment of ZD. Both these approaches are a minimally invasive approach to treat ZD. We compared the TSDE management of ZD versus the ES treatment in a retrospective consecutive series of patients who were referred to either the ES or surgical unit of our Institute. Fifty-eight consecutive patients underwent treatment for ZD either by TSDE or ES. The two techniques were evaluated for length of hospital stay, diverticulum size, resumption of oral intake, resolution of dysphagia, and complications. Clinical outcome was evaluated throughout a symptom score from 0 to 3, calculated before and after the procedure. The two groups were compared on the various parameters using a Mann--Whitney test. Twenty-eight patients underwent ES and 30 TSDE for ZD. In both groups, a significant decrease in postoperative versus preoperative dysphagia was reported. The average length of hospital stay wasn't significantly different in the two groups (3.38 days for TSDE vs. 2.42 days for ES). The overall complication rate was similar in the two groups. There were two cases in the ES group and three cases in the TDSE group that required an ES revision to take down a residual diverticular wall that produced a mild but persistent dysphagia. Minimally invasive treatment of ZD both with ES and with TSDE is a valuable option for this disease: both techniques are safe and effective, with similar outcome in terms of hospital stay, symptom reduction, and complication rate. Long-term results have to be evaluated.

摘要

经口内镜吻合术(TSDE)在Zenker 憩室(ZD)的外科治疗中越来越受欢迎。与开放式治疗相比,这种方法的优势之一是早期康复,患者发病率和恢复口服摄入的时间明显减少。自 90 年代中期以来,还提出了通过软性内镜(ES)途径切除憩室和食管之间的隔段作为治疗 ZD 的替代方法。这两种方法都是治疗 ZD 的微创方法。我们比较了 TSDE 和 ES 治疗 ZD 的效果,这些患者连续就诊于我们研究所的 ES 或外科部门。58 例连续患者接受了 TSDE 或 ES 治疗 ZD。这两种技术的住院时间、憩室大小、恢复口服摄入、吞咽困难缓解和并发症进行了评估。通过术前和术后的症状评分(0 到 3 分)评估临床结果。使用曼-惠特尼检验比较两组的各项参数。28 例患者接受 ES 治疗,30 例患者接受 TSDE 治疗。在两组中,术后与术前相比,吞咽困难均有显著改善。两组的平均住院时间无显著差异(TSDE 组为 3.38 天,ES 组为 2.42 天)。两组的总并发症发生率相似。ES 组有两例,TSDE 组有三例需要 ES 复查,以切除残留的憩室壁,该憩室壁产生轻度但持续的吞咽困难。ES 和 TSDE 治疗 ZD 的微创治疗是该疾病的一种有价值的选择:两种技术均安全有效,在住院时间、症状缓解和并发症发生率方面具有相似的结果。需要评估长期结果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验